IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v34y2025i3d10.1007_s10726-025-09920-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Information Load on Predicting Success in Electronic Negotiations

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammed-Fatih Kaya

    (University of Hohenheim)

  • Mareike Schoop

    (University of Hohenheim)

Abstract

The exchange of information is an essential means for being able to conduct negotiations and to derive situational decisions. In electronic negotiations, information is transferred in the form of requests, offers, questions and clarifications consisting of communication and decisions. Taken together, such information makes or breaks the negotiation. Whilst information analysis has traditionally been conducted through human coding, machine learning techniques now enable automated analyses. One of the grand challenges of electronic negotiation research is the generation of predictions as to whether ongoing negotiations will success or fail at the end of the negotiation process by considering the previous negotiation course. With this goal in mind, the present research paper investigates the impact of information load on predicting success and failure in electronic negotiations and how predictive machine learning models react to the successive increase of negotiation data. Information in different data combinations is used for the evaluation of various classification techniques to simulate the progress in negotiation processes and to investigate the impact of increasing information load hidden in the utility and communication data. It will be shown that the more information the merrier the result does not always hold. Instead, data-driven ML model recommendations are presented as to when and based on which data density certain models should or should not be used for the prediction of success and failure of electronic negotiations.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammed-Fatih Kaya & Mareike Schoop, 2025. "The Impact of Information Load on Predicting Success in Electronic Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 487-521, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09920-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-025-09920-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-025-09920-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-025-09920-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tine Bertoncel & Ivan Erenda & Mirjana Pejić Bach & Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško, 2018. "A Managerial Early Warning System at a Smart Factory: An Intuitive Decision‐making Perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 406-416, July.
    2. John Zeleznikow, 2021. "Using Artificial Intelligence to provide Intelligent Dispute Resolution Support," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 789-812, August.
    3. Zhi-Xue Zhang & Yu-Lan Han, 2007. "The effects of reciprocation wariness on negotiation behavior and outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 507-525, November.
    4. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 197-227, June.
    5. Vivi Nastase & Sabine Koeszegi & Stan Szpakowicz, 2007. "Content Analysis Through the Machine Learning Mill," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 335-346, July.
    6. Citroen, Charles L., 2011. "The role of information in strategic decision-making," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 493-501.
    7. Wendi L. Adair & Jeanne M. Brett, 2005. "The Negotiation Dance: Time, Culture, and Behavioral Sequences in Negotiation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 33-51, February.
    8. Matthias Schonlau & Rosie Yuyan Zou, 2020. "The random forest algorithm for statistical learning," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 20(1), pages 3-29, March.
    9. Marina Sokolova & Guy Lapalme, 2012. "How Much Do We Say? Using Informativeness of Negotiation Text Records for Early Prediction of Negotiation Outcomes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 363-379, May.
    10. Douglas P. Twitchell & Matthew L. Jensen & Douglas C. Derrick & Judee K. Burgoon & Jay F. Nunamaker, 2013. "Negotiation Outcome Classification Using Language Features," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 135-151, January.
    11. Gérard Biau & Erwan Scornet, 2016. "Rejoinder on: A random forest guided tour," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(2), pages 264-268, June.
    12. Hamid Saadatfar & Samiyeh Khosravi & Javad Hassannataj Joloudari & Amir Mosavi & Shahaboddin Shamshirband, 2020. "A New K-Nearest Neighbors Classifier for Big Data Based on Efficient Data Pruning," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jianghong Xu & Wei Lu & Weixin Wang, 2024. "From “fragile smallholders” to “resilient smallholders”: measuring rural household resilience in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Gordeev, Stepan & Steinbach, Sandro, 2024. "Determinants of PTA design: Insights from machine learning," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Xue, Shaobo & Ma, Bo & Wang, Chenguang & Li, Zhanbin, 2023. "Identifying key landscape pattern indices influencing the NPP: A case study of the upper and middle reaches of the Yellow River," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    4. Sebastián Rodríguez & Pablo Cabrera-Barona, 2024. "A machine learning-based assessment of subjective quality of life," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 451-467, April.
    5. Hou, Lei & Elsworth, Derek & Zhang, Fengshou & Wang, Zhiyuan & Zhang, Jianbo, 2023. "Evaluation of proppant injection based on a data-driven approach integrating numerical and ensemble learning models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Ma, Zhikai & Huo, Qian & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Tao, 2023. "Voltage-temperature aware thermal runaway alarming framework for electric vehicles via deep learning with attention mechanism in time-frequency domain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    7. Patrick Krennmair & Timo Schmid, 2022. "Flexible domain prediction using mixed effects random forests," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(5), pages 1865-1894, November.
    8. Jie Shi & Arno P. J. M. Siebes & Siamak Mehrkanoon, 2023. "TransCORALNet: A Two-Stream Transformer CORAL Networks for Supply Chain Credit Assessment Cold Start," Papers 2311.18749, arXiv.org.
    9. Bourdouxhe, Axel & Wibail, Lionel & Claessens, Hugues & Dufrêne, Marc, 2023. "Modeling potential natural vegetation: A new light on an old concept to guide nature conservation in fragmented and degraded landscapes," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 481(C).
    10. Manuel J. García Rodríguez & Vicente Rodríguez Montequín & Francisco Ortega Fernández & Joaquín M. Villanueva Balsera, 2019. "Public Procurement Announcements in Spain: Regulations, Data Analysis, and Award Price Estimator Using Machine Learning," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-20, November.
    11. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    12. Yiyi Huo & Yingying Fan & Fang Han, 2023. "On the adaptation of causal forests to manifold data," Papers 2311.16486, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    13. Akshita Bassi & Aditya Manchanda & Rajwinder Singh & Mahesh Patel, 2023. "A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of compressive strength of rice husk ash-based concrete," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(1), pages 209-238, August.
    14. Sachin Kumar & Zairu Nisha & Jagvinder Singh & Anuj Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Sensor network driven novel hybrid model based on feature selection and SVR to predict indoor temperature for energy consumption optimisation in smart buildings," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 3048-3061, December.
    15. Yong-Chao Su & Cheng-Yu Wu & Cheng-Hong Yang & Bo-Sheng Li & Sin-Hua Moi & Yu-Da Lin, 2021. "Machine Learning Data Imputation and Prediction of Foraging Group Size in a Kleptoparasitic Spider," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Diogenis A. Kiziridis & Anna Mastrogianni & Magdalini Pleniou & Elpida Karadimou & Spyros Tsiftsis & Fotios Xystrakis & Ioannis Tsiripidis, 2022. "Acceleration and Relocation of Abandonment in a Mediterranean Mountainous Landscape: Drivers, Consequences, and Management Implications," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, March.
    17. Escribano, Álvaro & Wang, Dandan, 2021. "Mixed random forest, cointegration, and forecasting gasoline prices," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1442-1462.
    18. Hunish Bansal & Basavraj Chinagundi & Prashant Singh Rana & Neeraj Kumar, 2022. "An Ensemble Machine Learning Technique for Detection of Abnormalities in Knee Movement Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    19. Yigit Aydede & Jan Ditzen, 2022. "Identifying the regional drivers of influenza-like illness in Nova Scotia with dominance analysis," Papers 2212.06684, arXiv.org.
    20. Siyoon Kwon & Hyoseob Noh & Il Won Seo & Sung Hyun Jung & Donghae Baek, 2021. "Identification Framework of Contaminant Spill in Rivers Using Machine Learning with Breakthrough Curve Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-26, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:34:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10726-025-09920-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.