IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/grdene/v33y2024i2d10.1007_s10726-023-09862-w.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Water Resources Management Simulation–Optimization Model: Application of Graph-Based Hypergame Model in Water Supply Conflicts Resolution

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Nikoo

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Azizallah Izady

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Parnian Hashempour Bakhtiari

    (Shiraz University)

  • Ali Al-Maktoumi

    (Sultan Qaboos University
    Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Mingjie Chen

    (Sultan Qaboos University)

  • Amir H. Gandomi

    (University of Technology Sydney
    Obuda University)

Abstract

To mitigate the unfavorable effects of excessive water resources consumption, mainly induced by poor performance of irrigation practices, efficient water resource management strategies are required. In response to this need, we have, in an innovative way, enhanced the water resources management (WRM) strategies by both considering the regional conditions with the graph model for a conflict resolution (GMCR) decision support system, and linking the irrigation concept and water resources allocation theory to develop a coupled WRM simulation–optimization model. Typically, implementation of the modified WRM strategies may cause local conflicts because of losing the original water rights. To improve the current irrigation water allocation system with the minimum objections, the hypergame theory was utilized to enhance the capabilities of traditional GMCR models by including the parties’ misunderstandings in the negotiation process and assessing the partial perceptions rather than crisp options. Moreover, by dynamic monitoring of available water resources and water consumption patterns, a WRM simulation model was developed, which is applicable in real agricultural conditions of multi-agricultural zones with multi-crop and intercropping systems and variable water supply sources. The genetic algorithm was utilized to allocate the water resources and determine optimal WRM strategies with the lowest irrigation water shortage. The efficiency of the proposed framework was assessed in conventional agricultural zones in Oman. The recommended strategies not only address local conflicts during the implementation of optimal WRM strategies, but also demonstrate significant potential to reduce the water shortage as a serious environmental concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Nikoo & Azizallah Izady & Parnian Hashempour Bakhtiari & Ali Al-Maktoumi & Mingjie Chen & Amir H. Gandomi, 2024. "A Water Resources Management Simulation–Optimization Model: Application of Graph-Based Hypergame Model in Water Supply Conflicts Resolution," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 291-326, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09862-w
    DOI: 10.1007/s10726-023-09862-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10726-023-09862-w
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10726-023-09862-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shawei He & Keith Hipel & D. Kilgour, 2014. "Water Diversion Conflicts in China: A Hierarchical Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1823-1837, May.
    2. Boyang Dai & Xiangfeng Yang & Xiaoyue Liu, 2022. "Shapley Value of Uncertain Coalitional Game based on Hurwicz Criterion with Application to Water Resource Allocation," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 241-260, February.
    3. Dimitris Fotakis & Epameinondas Sidiropoulos, 2014. "Combined land-use and water allocation planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 169-185, August.
    4. Keith W. Hipel & Liping Fang & D. Marc Kilgour, 2020. "The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution: Reflections on Three Decades of Development," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 11-60, February.
    5. Keith W. Hipel & D. Marc Kilgour & Rami A. Kinsara, 2014. "Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 355-376, May.
    6. Dai, Z.Y. & Li, Y.P., 2013. "A multistage irrigation water allocation model for agricultural land-use planning under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 69-79.
    7. Li, Mo & Guo, Ping & Singh, Vijay P., 2016. "An efficient irrigation water allocation model under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 46-57.
    8. Abbas Mirzaei & Mansour Zibaei, 2021. "Water Conflict Management between Agriculture and Wetland under Climate Change: Application of Economic-Hydrological-Behavioral Modelling," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Yasir M. Aljefri & Liping Fang & Keith W. Hipel & Kaveh Madani, 2019. "Strategic Analyses of the Hydropolitical Conflicts Surrounding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 305-340, April.
    10. Al-Marshudi, Ahmed Salim, 2007. "The falaj irrigation system and water allocation markets in Northern Oman," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-3), pages 71-77, July.
    11. Mengjie Yang & Kai Yang & Yue Che & Shiqiang Lu & Fengyun Sun & Ying Chen & Mengting Li, 2021. "Resolving Transboundary Water Conflicts: Dynamic Evolutionary Analysis Using an Improved GMCR Model," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(10), pages 3321-3338, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Shunke & Chang, Jingjing & Xue, Jie & Sun, Huaiwei & Zeng, Fanjiang & Liu, Lei & Liu, Xin & Li, Xinxin, 2024. "Coupling behavioral economics and water management policies for agricultural land-use planning in basin irrigation districts: Agent-based socio-hydrological modeling and application," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    2. Liangyan Tao & Xuebi Su & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2021. "Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution based on the Genetic Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1085-1112, October.
    3. Zhang, Chenglong & Yang, Gaiqiang & Wang, Chaozi & Huo, Zailin, 2023. "Linking agricultural water-food-environment nexus with crop area planning: A fuzzy credibility-based multi-objective linear fractional programming approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    4. Ricardo Lopes Andrade & Maísa Mendonça Silva & Leandro Chaves Rêgo, 2023. "A Scientometric and Social Network Analysis of the Literature on the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(5), pages 1061-1082, October.
    5. Wesley Douglas Oliveira Silva & Danielle Costa Morais & Marcella Maia Urtiga, 2022. "An integrative negotiation model to deal with conflicts toward water resources management: a case study in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10443-10469, August.
    6. Zhang, Chenglong & Guo, Ping & Huo, Zailin, 2021. "Irrigation water resources management under uncertainty: An interval nonlinear double-sided fuzzy chance-constrained programming approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Emerson Rodrigues Sabino & Danielle Costa Morais & Leandro Chaves Rêgo & Gabriela Silva Silva, 2024. "A group decision model to support the water resources conflict resolution in Carás Valley, a northeast Brazilian region," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 8139-8157, March.
    8. Liu, Duan & Yu, Nizhou & Wan, Hong, 2022. "Does water rights trading affect corporate investment? The role of resource allocation and risk mitigation channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Bingkui Qiu & Shasha Lu & Min Zhou & Lu Zhang & Yu Deng & Ci Song & Zuo Zhang, 2015. "A Hybrid Inexact Optimization Method for Land-Use Allocation in Association with Environmental/Ecological Requirements at a Watershed Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Chen, Shu & Shao, Dongguo & Tan, Xuezhi & Gu, Wenquan & Lei, Caixiu, 2017. "An interval multistage classified model for regional inter- and intra-seasonal water management under uncertain and nonstationary condition," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 98-112.
    11. Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Elahi, Ehsan & Wan, Anxia, 2023. "Can third-party market cooperation solve the dilemma of emissions reduction? A case study of energy investment project conflict analysis in the context of carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    12. Shafi, Ahsan & Wang, Zhanqi & Ehsan, Muhsan & Riaz, Faizan Ahmed & Ali, Muhammad Rashid & Xu, Feng, 2023. "A game theory approach to land acquisition conflicts in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    13. R. Roozbahani & B. Abbasi & S. Schreider, 2015. "Optimal allocation of water to competing stakeholders in a shared watershed," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 657-676, June.
    14. Shukui Tan & Lu Zhang & Min Zhou & Yanan Li & Siliang Wang & Bing Kuang & Xiang Luo, 2017. "A hybrid mathematical model for urban land-use planning in association with environmental–ecological consideration under uncertainty," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 44(1), pages 54-79, January.
    15. Qianqian Gu & Lei Hang, 2022. "A Game Analysis-Based Behavioral Interaction Framework between Governments and Innovative Enterprises for Intellectual Property Regulation Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-20, May.
    16. Liuyue He & Sufen Wang & Congcong Peng & Qian Tan, 2018. "Optimization of Water Consumption Distribution Based on Crop Suitability in the Middle Reaches of Heihe River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Alexandra Tomaz & José Ferro Palma & Maria Isabel Patanita & José Penacho & José Dôres & Maria Natividade Costa & Elisabete Rosa & Alexandra Tomaz & Isabel Guerreiro & Manuel Patanita, 2017. "An Overview on the Use of Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers in Irrigated Mediterranean Agriculture," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 1(7), pages 1938-1940, December.
    18. Marcella Maia Urtiga & Danielle Costa Morais & Keith W. Hipel & D. Marc Kilgour, 2017. "Group Decision Methodology to Support Watershed Committees in Choosing Among Combinations of Alternatives," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 729-752, July.
    19. Shawei He & Xiaohui Liu & Xianmei Li, 2023. "A Graph Model for Conflict Resolution with Time-varying Attitudes and Its Application to China-US Trade Disputes," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 603-631, June.
    20. M. Nassereddine & M. A. Ellakkis & A. Azar & M. D. Nayeri, 2021. "Developing a Multi-methodology for Conflict Resolution: Case of Yemen’s Humanitarian Crisis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 301-320, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:grdene:v:33:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s10726-023-09862-w. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.