IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/eujhec/v20y2019i1d10.1007_s10198-019-01064-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey

Author

Listed:
  • Óscar Brito Fernandes

    (Corvinus University of Budapest
    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Petra Baji

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

  • Dionne Kringos

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Niek Klazinga

    (Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • László Gulácsi

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

  • Armin Lucevic

    (Corvinus University of Budapest
    Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam)

  • Imre Boncz

    (University of Pécs)

  • Márta Péntek

    (Corvinus University of Budapest)

Abstract

Background Health systems are undertaking efforts to make health care more patient centered and value based. To achieve this goal, the use of patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) is increasing, especially across OECD countries. However, in Hungary, data on patients’ experiences are still lacking. Thus, our aim was twofold: first, to collect data on outpatient experience in Hungary on patient–doctor communication and patient involvement in decision making and compare it with that of other OECD countries; second, to assess associations of outpatient experience with patients’ socioeconomic characteristics. Methods In early 2019, we conducted a cross-sectional, online, self-administered survey in a national representative sample of Hungary’s population (n = 1000). The sample was weighted considering gender, age, highest education level attained, type of settlement, and region of residence. The survey questions were based on a set of recommended questions by the OECD. Results Our findings show that the proportion of reported positive experiences is as follows: doctors providing easy-to-understand explanations (93.1%) followed by time spent on the consultation (87.5%), opportunities to raise questions (85.8%), and doctors involving patients in decision making about care and treatment (80.1%). The share of positive experiences falls behind OECD’s average regarding patient–doctor communication and patient involvement in decision making, which signals room for improvement in these areas. Conclusions Women, younger people, people with a paid job, and patients with consultations with allied health professionals reported significant lesser positive care experiences and, hence, more targeted policies can be initiated based on our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Óscar Brito Fernandes & Petra Baji & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Armin Lucevic & Imre Boncz & Márta Péntek, 2019. "Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 79-90, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01064-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10198-019-01064-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10198-019-01064-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10198-019-01064-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takuya Aoki & Machiko Inoue, 2017. "Association between health literacy and patient experience of primary care attributes: A cross-sectional study in Japan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-10, September.
    2. Street Jr., Richard L. & Gordon, Howard & Haidet, Paul, 2007. "Physicians' communication and perceptions of patients: Is it how they look, how they talk, or is it just the doctor?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 586-598, August.
    3. Ammi, Mehdi & Ambrose, Sarah & Hogg, Bill & Wong, Sabrina, 2017. "The influence of registered nurses and nurse practitioners on patient experience with primary care: results from the Canadian QUALICO-PC study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(12), pages 1215-1224.
    4. Rie Fujisawa & Nicolaas S. Klazinga, 2017. "Measuring patient experiences (PREMS): Progress made by the OECD and its member countries between 2006 and 2016," OECD Health Working Papers 102, OECD Publishing.
    5. Faraz Ahmed & Jenni Burt & Martin Roland, 2014. "Measuring Patient Experience: Concepts and Methods," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(3), pages 235-241, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Márta Péntek & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Petra Baji, 2020. "Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Armin Lucevic & Márta Péntek & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Zsombor Zrubka & Petra Baji, 2021. "Self-Reported Waiting Times for Outpatient Health Care Services in Hungary: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey on a National Representative Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Márta Péntek & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Petra Baji, 2020. "Eliciting preferences for outpatient care experiences in Hungary: A discrete choice experiment with a national representative sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Cousin, Gaëtan & Schmid Mast, Marianne & Jaunin-Stalder, Nicole, 2013. "Finding the right interactional temperature: Do colder patients need more warmth in physician communication style?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 18-23.
    3. Lee, Yin-Yang & Lin, Julia L., 2010. "Do patient autonomy preferences matter? Linking patient-centered care to patient-physician relationships and health outcomes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(10), pages 1811-1818, November.
    4. Fenton, Anny T. & Elliott, Marc N. & Schwebel, David C. & Berkowitz, Zahava & Liddon, Nicole C. & Tortolero, Susan R. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Davies, Suzy L. & Schuster, Mark A., 2018. "Unequal interactions: Examining the role of patient-centered care in reducing inequitable diffusion of a medical innovation, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 238-248.
    5. Li Cao & Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong & Edward B. McNeil, 2022. "The Association between mHealth App Use and Healthcare Satisfaction among Clients at Outpatient Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study in Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, June.
    6. Greenfield, Geva & Pliskin, Joseph S. & Feder-Bubis, Paula & Wientroub, Shlomo & Davidovitch, Nadav, 2012. "Patient–physician relationships in second opinion encounters – The physicians’ perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(7), pages 1202-1212.
    7. Teal, Cayla R. & Street, Richard L., 2009. "Critical elements of culturally competent communication in the medical encounter: A review and model," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 533-543, February.
    8. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Armin Lucevic & Márta Péntek & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Zsombor Zrubka & Petra Baji, 2021. "Self-Reported Waiting Times for Outpatient Health Care Services in Hungary: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey on a National Representative Sample," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-14, February.
    9. Charlotte T. Lee & Susanne Phillips & Susan Tiso & Camille Fitzpatrick, 2019. "Exploring Interpersonal Relationships in a Nurse-Managed Clinic and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    10. Muahammad Alqudah & Leanne Cowin & Ajesh George & Maree Johnson, 2019. "Child fever management: A comparative study of Australian parents with limited and functional health literacy," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 157-163, June.
    11. Charles Crabtree & John B. Holbein & J. Quin Monson, 2022. "Patient traits shape health-care stakeholders’ choices on how to best allocate life-saving care," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 244-257, February.
    12. Attanasio, Laura B. & Hardeman, Rachel R., 2019. "Declined care and discrimination during the childbirth hospitalization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 270-277.
    13. Armin Lucevic & Márta Péntek & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Óscar Brito Fernandes & Imre Boncz & Petra Baji, 2019. "Unmet medical needs in ambulatory care in Hungary: forgone visits and medications from a representative population survey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 71-78, June.
    14. Anne-Gaëlle Corroller & Julia Bonastre, 2023. "Patient-reported measures: how useful in health economics?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 1-4, February.
    15. Kelly-Irving, Michelle & Delpierre, Cyrille & Schieber, Anne-Cécile & Lepage, Benoit & Rolland, Christine & Afrité, Anissa & Pascal, Jean & Cases, Chantal & Lombrail, Pierre & Lang, Thierry, 2011. "Do general practitioners overestimate the health of their patients with lower education?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1416-1421.
    16. Sana LOUE, 2018. "Using Sociodrama to Foster Cultural Humility among Faculty and Students in the Academic Medical Center," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 45-57, June.
    17. Andrea C Schöpf & Werner Vach & Marcel Jakob & Franziska Saxer, 2019. "Routine patient surveys: Patients’ preferences and information gained by healthcare providers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Kuhlmann, Ellen & Groenewegen, Peter P. & Bond, Christine & Burau, Viola & Hunter, David J., 2018. "Primary care workforce development in Europe: An overview of health system responses and stakeholder views," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(10), pages 1055-1062.
    19. Ramos, Luís Moura & Quintal, Carlota & Lourenço, Óscar & Antunes, Micaela, 2019. "Unmet needs across Europe: Disclosing knowledge beyond the ordinary measure," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(12), pages 1155-1162.
    20. Katarzyna Krot & Iga Rudawska, 2021. "How Public Trust in Health Care Can Shape Patient Overconsumption in Health Systems? The Missing Links," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-15, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Patient-reported experience measure; Quality of care; Outpatient care; OECD; Survey; Hungary;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eujhec:v:20:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10198-019-01064-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.