IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i11p6916-d832037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Association between mHealth App Use and Healthcare Satisfaction among Clients at Outpatient Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study in Inner Mongolia, China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Cao

    (Information Technology Department, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010110, China
    Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

  • Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong

    (Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

  • Edward B. McNeil

    (Department of Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai 90110, Thailand)

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth) applications (apps) have been developed in hospital settings to allocate and manage medical care services, which is one of the national strategies to improve health care in China. Little is known about the comprehensive effects of hospital-based mHealth app use on client satisfaction. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the full range of mHealth app use and satisfaction domains among clients attending outpatient clinics. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to February 2021 in twelve tertiary hospitals in Inner Mongolia. After the construction of the mHealth app use, structural equation modeling was used for data analysis. Of 1889 participants, the standardized coefficients β on environment/convenience, health information, and medical service fees were 0.11 ( p < 0.001), 0.06 ( p = 0.039), and 0.08 ( p = 0.004), respectively. However, app use was not significantly associated with satisfaction of doctor–patient communication (β = 0.05, p = 0.069), short-term outcomes (β = 0.05, p = 0.054), and general satisfaction (β = 0.02, p = 0.429). Clients of the study hospitals were satisfied with the services, but their satisfaction was not much associated with mHealth use. The limitation of the mHealth system should be improved to enhance communication and engagement among clients, doctors, and healthcare givers, as well as to pay more attention to health outcomes and satisfaction of clients.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Cao & Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong & Edward B. McNeil, 2022. "The Association between mHealth App Use and Healthcare Satisfaction among Clients at Outpatient Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study in Inner Mongolia, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6916-:d:832037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6916/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/11/6916/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Renato Santos De Almeida & Stéphane Bourliataux-Lajoinie & Mônica Martins, 2015. "Satisfaction measurement instruments for healthcare service users: a systematic review," Post-Print hal-03165065, HAL.
    2. Abid Hussain & Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Jinsoo Hwang, 2019. "Measuring OPD Patient Satisfaction with Different Service Delivery Aspects at Public Hospitals in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-9, July.
    3. Georgina Jones & Victoria Brennan & Richard Jacques & Hilary Wood & Simon Dixon & Stephen Radley, 2018. "Evaluating the impact of a ‘virtual clinic’ on patient experience, personal and provider costs of care in urinary incontinence: A randomised controlled trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Faraz Ahmed & Jenni Burt & Martin Roland, 2014. "Measuring Patient Experience: Concepts and Methods," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 7(3), pages 235-241, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanmei Jiang & Antonio K. W. Lau, 2023. "Understanding Post-Adoption Behavioral Intentions of Mobile Health Service Users: An Empirical Study during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-21, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Óscar Brito Fernandes & Petra Baji & Dionne Kringos & Niek Klazinga & László Gulácsi & Armin Lucevic & Imre Boncz & Márta Péntek, 2019. "Patient experiences with outpatient care in Hungary: results of an online population survey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 79-90, June.
    2. Nik Aida Nik Adib & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Azriani Ab Rahman & Raishan Shafini Bakar & Nor Azni Yahaya & Suria Hussin & Wan Nor Arifin, 2018. "Translation and Validation of the Malay Version of the Parents’ Satisfaction Scale (PSS-M) for Assessment of Caregivers’ Satisfaction with Health Care Services for Children with Autism Spectrum Disord," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Noman Sahito & Jinsoo Hwang & Abid Hussain & Faiza Manzoor, 2019. "Can Leadership Enhance Patient Satisfaction? Assessing the Role of Administrative and Medical Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Iwona Malinowska-Lipień & Agnieszka Micek & Teresa Gabryś & Maria Kózka & Krzysztof Gajda & Agnieszka Gniadek & Tomasz Brzostek & Jason Fletcher & Allison Squires, 2021. "Impact of the Work Environment on Patients’ Safety as Perceived by Nurses in Poland—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    5. Daniel Rey Aldana & Francisco Reyes Santias & Pilar Mazón Ramos & Manuel Portela Romero & Sergio Cinza Sanjurjo & Belén Álvarez Álvarez & Rosa Agra Bermejo & Francisco Gude Sampedro & José R. González, 2021. "Cost and Potential Savings of Electronic Consultation and Its Relationship with Reduction in Atmospheric Pollution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Abid Hussain & Mingxing Li & Shahida Kanwel & Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Jinsoo Hwang, 2023. "Impact of Tourism Satisfaction and Service Quality on Destination Loyalty: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach concerning China Resort Hotels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Abid Hussain & Muhammad Asif & Syed Irshad Ali Shah, 2019. "Patient Satisfaction with Health Care Services; An Application of Physician’s Behavior as a Moderator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Maya Kylén & Ulla-Karin Schön & Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen & Marie Elf, 2022. "Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Xiaojing Fan & Min Su & Yaxin Zhao & Duolao Wang, 2021. "Dissatisfaction with Local Medical Services for Middle-Aged and Elderly in China: What Is Relevant?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Tello, Juan E. & Barbazza, Erica & Waddell, Kerry, 2020. "Review of 128 quality of care mechanisms: A framework and mapping for health system stewards," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 12-24.
    11. Charlotte T. Lee & Susanne Phillips & Susan Tiso & Camille Fitzpatrick, 2019. "Exploring Interpersonal Relationships in a Nurse-Managed Clinic and Their Impact on Clinical Outcomes," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    12. Hyunjoon Kim & Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Muhammad Asif, 2019. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Travelers’ Well-Being Perceptions: Focusing on Chinese Tourist Shopping at a Duty Free," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Victoria K. Brennan & Georgina Jones & Stephen Radley & Simon Dixon, 2021. "Incorporating Process Utility into Cost-Effectiveness Analysis via a Bolt-On Domain to the SF-6D: An Exploratory Study," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 747-756, September.
    14. Anne-Gaëlle Corroller & Julia Bonastre, 2023. "Patient-reported measures: how useful in health economics?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 1-4, February.
    15. Aida Isabel Tavares & Pedro Lopes Ferreira, 2020. "Public satisfaction with health system coverage, empirical evidence from SHARE data," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 229-249, September.
    16. Andrea C Schöpf & Werner Vach & Marcel Jakob & Franziska Saxer, 2019. "Routine patient surveys: Patients’ preferences and information gained by healthcare providers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Joy Davis & Sue Sinni & Stephen Maloney & Lorraine Walker, 2022. "Strategies Australian Hospitals Utilize to Incorporate Patient Feedback in the Delivery and Measurement of Person-Centered Care: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 31(5), pages 782-794, June.
    18. Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Abid Hussain & Jinsoo Hwang & Noman Sahito, 2019. "Linking Transformational Leadership with Nurse-Assessed Adverse Patient Outcomes and the Quality of Care: Assessing the Role of Job Satisfaction and Structural Empowerment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Ferreira, Diogo Cunha & Marques, Rui Cunha & Nunes, Alexandre Morais & Figueira, José Rui, 2021. "Customers satisfaction in pediatric inpatient services: A multiple criteria satisfaction analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    20. Fernanda Manuela Loureiro & Ana Vanessa dos Reis Ameixa Antunes & Tiina Pelander & Zaida Borges Charepe, 2021. "The experience of school‐aged children with hospitalisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3-4), pages 550-558, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:11:p:6916-:d:832037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.