IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/envsyd/v42y2022i2d10.1007_s10669-022-09850-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-making desktop software and mobile app for wastewater treatment: selection of experimental parameters to estimate hydrogen peroxide production

Author

Listed:
  • Mário Mollo Neto

    (São Paulo State University (UNESP))

  • Mariana Matulovic

    (São Paulo State University (UNESP))

  • Ana Karollina M. Novaes

    (São Paulo State University (UNESP))

  • Livia V. Sanches

    (São Paulo State University (UNESP))

  • Juliane C. Forti

    (São Paulo State University (UNESP))

Abstract

In a decade marked by 4.0 technologies, using some of them for the optimization of effluent treatment processes is one of the objectives of the current researchers in this area. In this paper, we present two models as a fuzzy rule-based expert system, utilized in a computer desktop platform “Peroxide 1.0” and a mobile app “Peroxide App.” The objective is to select the best experimental parameters-electrodes type and potential-for the maximization of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) electrogeneration. In situ H2O2 generation has as an auxiliary function to be used in the advanced oxidative processes for the degradation of persistent organic pollutants and emerging contaminants, which are not treated by traditional chemical and biological processes. For the construction of the proposed software in this study, the data were initially correlated using the MATLAB® platform Fuzzy toolbox, and the expert knowledge and literature were associated by a desktop and mobile knowledge system that weighs the variables according to their impact on the electrogeneration productivity. The desktop end-user interface was coded using Microsoft Visual Studio Rapid Application Development, and the mobile app was developed on the Android platform similar to Peroxide 1.0, adopting the specifics and particularity of the programming system. The developed systems were validated in different laboratory scenarios, and their performance were considered satisfactory, in agreement with the literature. Therefore, it is concluded that the Peroxide 1.0 and Peroxide App models can be a significant contribution to and advance the improvement in the processes for all types of industries that generate chemical effluents and require their treatment based on oxidative processes that use H2O2.

Suggested Citation

  • Mário Mollo Neto & Mariana Matulovic & Ana Karollina M. Novaes & Livia V. Sanches & Juliane C. Forti, 2022. "Decision-making desktop software and mobile app for wastewater treatment: selection of experimental parameters to estimate hydrogen peroxide production," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 295-305, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09850-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10669-022-09850-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10669-022-09850-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10669-022-09850-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ikujiro Nonaka, 1994. "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 14-37, February.
    2. Dejian Yu & Zeshui Xu & Wanru Wang, 2019. "A bibliometric analysis of Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making (2002–2017)," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 371-397, September.
    3. Yushan Zhao & Marilyn Lavin, 2012. "An Empirical Study Of Knowledge Transfer In Working Relationships With Suppliers In New Product Development," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-26.
    4. Nidhra, Srinivas & Yanamadala, Muralidhar & Afzal, Wasif & Torkar, Richard, 2013. "Knowledge transfer challenges and mitigation strategies in global software development—A systematic literature review and industrial validation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 333-355.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rashid, Mehvish & Clarke, Paul M. & O’Connor, Rory V., 2019. "A systematic examination of knowledge loss in open source software projects," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-123.
    2. Lu, Jinfeng & Dimov, Dimo, 2023. "A system dynamics modelling of entrepreneurship and growth within firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 38(3).
    3. Olunifesi Adekunle Suraj, 2016. "Managing Telecommunications for Development: An Analysis of Intellectual Capital in Nigerian Telecommunication Industry," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(01), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Soufiane Mezzourh & Walid A Nakara, 2009. "Governance and innovation : A Knowledge-based approach [La gouvernance de l'innovation : une approche par la connaissance]," Post-Print halshs-01955966, HAL.
    5. M. Max Evans & Ilja Frissen & Anthony K. P. Wensley, 2018. "Organisational Information and Knowledge Sharing: Uncovering Mediating Effects of Perceived Trustworthiness Using the PROCESS Approach," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Chris Kimble & José Braga Vasconcelos & Álvaro Rocha, 2016. "Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 18(6), pages 1119-1130, December.
    7. Maurizio Zollo, 1998. "Strategies or Routines ? Knowledge Codification, Path-Dependence and the Evolution of Post-Acquisition Integration Practices in the U.S. Banking Industry," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 97-10, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    8. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386, December.
    9. David Vallat, 2015. "Une alternative au dualisme État-Marché : l’économie collaborative, questions pratiques et épistémologiques," Working Papers halshs-01249308, HAL.
    10. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    11. Christoph P. Kiefer & Pablo Del Río González & Javier Carrillo‐Hermosilla, 2019. "Drivers and barriers of eco‐innovation types for sustainable transitions: A quantitative perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 155-172, January.
    12. Ahammad, Mohammad Faisal & Tarba, Shlomo Yedidia & Liu, Yipeng & Glaister, Keith W., 2016. "Knowledge transfer and cross-border acquisition performance: The impact of cultural distance and employee retention," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 66-75.
    13. Arkadiusz Kijek & Tomasz Kijek, 2019. "Knowledge Spillovers: An Evidence from The European Regions," JOItmC, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-15, September.
    14. Liuan Wang & Lu (Lucy) Yan & Tongxin Zhou & Xitong Guo & Gregory R. Heim, 2020. "Understanding Physicians’ Online-Offline Behavior Dynamics: An Empirical Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 537-555, June.
    15. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    16. Schilling, Melissa A. & Green, Elad, 2011. "Recombinant search and breakthrough idea generation: An analysis of high impact papers in the social sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 1321-1331.
    17. Carmelina Bevilacqua & Yapeng Ou & Pasquale Pizzimenti & Guglielmo Minervino, 2019. "New Public Institutional Forms and Social Innovation in Urban Governance: Insights from the “Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics” (MONUM) in Boston," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Shahid Qureshi & Sarfraz Mian, 2021. "Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: evidence from Pakistan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 366-392, April.
    19. Giovana Escrivão & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2016. "Linking Knowledge Creation and Environmental Education," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-23, June.
    20. Chien-Hsing Wu & Shu-Chen Kao, 2016. "Appraisal of Knowledge Object Use via a Three-Phase Flow Profile," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:envsyd:v:42:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10669-022-09850-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.