IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/endesu/v27y2025i2d10.1007_s10668-024-04467-y.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and obstacle factors diagnosis of Agriculture Green Development level in China’s Yangtze River Basin based on the DPSIR framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yingling Zhou

    (Chongqing Technology and Business University
    Chongqing Finance and Economics College
    Chongqing Finance and Economics College)

  • Jianfang Peng

    (Chongqing Technology and Business University)

  • Zhiyong Zhang

    (Chongqing Technology and Business University
    Chongqing Finance and Economics College
    Guizhou Academy of Social Sciences)

  • Yangjie Li

    (Chongqing Technology and Business University
    Chongqing Finance and Economics College
    Chongqing Finance and Economics College)

  • Ling Cheng

    (Guizhou University of Finance and Economics)

Abstract

The Yangtze River Basin (YRB) supplies approximately 50% of all Chinese crops, making it a significant basis for agricultural production in China. Agriculture Green Development (AGD), one of China's leading agricultural development strategies, is one of the best methods to overcome the increasing tension between agriculture and environmental conservation in this basin, as well as achieve China's carbon peak and neutrality targets and a vital part of the UN's efforts to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Based on provincial panel data of the YRB from 2005 to 2020, this paper uses the improved entropy weight method and the obstacle factor model to figure out the AGD level and the factors that affect this basin. The results indicate that (1) the level of AGD in the YRB shows a clear increase trend from 2005 to 2020, and indicator layer D's growth rate is the highest. Nonetheless, the geographical difference is evident, demonstrating that downstream is superior to midstream, while midstream is superior to upstream. (2) I is the most significant factor impeding AGD, followed by R, D, S, and P. (3) "Manpower-ecology-land" is the primary factors limiting the AGD level in 68.42% of YRB provinces. (4) The degree of convergence in the order of the first three obstacles is shown as upstream regions > midstream regions > downstream regions. The result shows that while the YRB's AGD is outstanding, geographical variances and the effects of obstacles vary greatly. Therefore, we should implement specific strategies in line with regional circumstances and advance the AGD in the YRB through multi-dimensional approaches, such as boosting high-quality agriculture, waterlogging management, green production, and ecological restoration.

Suggested Citation

  • Yingling Zhou & Jianfang Peng & Zhiyong Zhang & Yangjie Li & Ling Cheng, 2025. "Evaluation and obstacle factors diagnosis of Agriculture Green Development level in China’s Yangtze River Basin based on the DPSIR framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4971-4999, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04467-y
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04467-y
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04467-y
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10668-024-04467-y?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodríguez-Entrena, Macario & Espinosa-Goded, María & Barreiro-Hurlé, Jesús, 2014. "The role of ancillary benefits on the value of agricultural soils carbon sequestration programmes: Evidence from a latent class approach to Andalusian olive groves," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 63-73.
    2. Liu, Yansui & Zou, Lilin & Wang, Yongsheng, 2020. "Spatial-temporal characteristics and influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China in recent 40 years," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    3. Wang, Di & Shen, Ye & Zhao, Yueying & He, Wei & Liu, Xue & Qian, Xiangyan & Lv, Tao, 2020. "Integrated assessment and obstacle factor diagnosis of China's scientific coal production capacity based on the PSR sustainability framework," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Armand Kasztelan, 2017. "Green Growth, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Terminological and Relational Discourse," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 487-499.
    5. Mon‐Chi Lio & Jin‐Li Hu, 2009. "Governance and Agricultural Production Efficiency: A Cross‐Country Aggregate Frontier Analysis," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 40-61, February.
    6. Shilin Li & Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Jiajia Duan & Danmeng Wang & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of China’s Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Considering Agricultural Carbon Sinks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Xiao, Lu & Liu, Jianyue & Ge, Jinwen, 2021. "Dynamic game in agriculture and industry cross-sectoral water pollution governance in developing countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Kanter, David R. & Musumba, Mark & Wood, Sylvia L.R. & Palm, Cheryl & Antle, John & Balvanera, Patricia & Dale, Virginia H. & Havlik, Petr & Kline, Keith L. & Scholes, R.J. & Thornton, Philip & Titton, 2018. "Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 73-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yongna Zou & Qingping Cheng & Hanyu Jin & Xuefu Pu, 2023. "Evaluation of Green Agricultural Development and Its Influencing Factors under the Framework of Sustainable Development Goals: Case Study of Lincang City, an Underdeveloped Mountainous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Xu, Jiuping & Shu, Kejing & Wang, Fengjuan & Yang, Guocan, 2024. "Bi-level multi-objective distribution strategy integrating the permit trading scheme towards coal production capacity layout optimization: Case study from China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Maria Orhean Vranceanu & Carmen Eugenia Nastase & Ancuta Lucaci, 2024. "The Perception of Tourism Entrepreneurs in Bukovina Region on Green Economy and Sustainability," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 112-120, August.
    4. Yunfei Feng & Yi Zhang & Zhaodan Wu & Quanliang Ye & Xinchun Cao, 2023. "Evaluation of Agricultural Eco-Efficiency and Its Spatiotemporal Differentiation in China, Considering Green Water Consumption and Carbon Emissions Based on Undesired Dynamic SBM-DEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-26, February.
    5. Jens Abildtrup & Jette Bredahl Jacobsen & Suzanne Elizabeth Vedel & Udo Mantau & Robert Mavsar & Davide Pettenella & Irina Prokofieva & Florian Schubert & Anne Stenger & Elsa Varela & Enrico Vidale & , 2024. "Preferences for climate change policies: the role of co-benefits," Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 110-128, January.
    6. Nancy Diana Panta, 2020. "Applying Value Chain Analysis through the Lens of Sustainability to Enterprises in the Beekeeping Sector," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 12, pages 107-116, Editura Lumen.
    7. Laima Česonienė & Daiva Šileikienė & Vitas Marozas & Laura Čiteikė, 2021. "Influence of Anthropogenic Loads on Surface Water Status: A Case Study in Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Cooper, Gregory S. & Rich, Karl M. & Shankar, Bhavani & Rana, Vinay & Ratna, Nazmun N. & Kadiyala, Suneetha & Alam, Mohammad J. & Nadagouda, Sharan B., 2021. "Identifying ‘win-win-win’ futures from inequitable value chain trade-offs: A system dynamics approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Lu Cai & Chaoqing Chai & Bangbang Zhang & Feng Yang & Wei Wang & Chengdong Zhang, 2022. "The Theoretical Approach and Practice of Farmland Rights System Reform from Decentralization to Centralization Promoting Agricultural Modernization: Evidence from Yuyang District in Shaanxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Guangyan Ran & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Mi Lv, 2023. "Relationship of Cooperative Management and Green and Low-Carbon Transition of Agriculture and Its Impacts: A Case Study of the Western Tarim River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Mengyang Hou & Zenglei Xi & Suyan Zhao, 2022. "Evaluating the Heterogeneity Effect of Fertilizer Use Intensity on Agricultural Eco-Efficiency in China: Evidence from a Panel Quantile Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-22, May.
    12. Shilin Li & Zhiyuan Zhu & Zhenzhong Dai & Jiajia Duan & Danmeng Wang & Yongzhong Feng, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Differentiation and Driving Factors of China’s Agricultural Eco-Efficiency Considering Agricultural Carbon Sinks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Uma Shankar Singh & Małgorzata Rutkowska & Paweł Bartoszczuk, 2022. "Renewable Energy Decision Criteria on Green Consumer Values Comparing Poland and India Aligned with Environment Policy for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Ping Li & Lijie He & Jun Zhang & Huihui Han & Yu Song, 2024. "Research on the Impact of Agricultural Socialization Services on the Ecological Efficiency of Agricultural Land Use," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, June.
    15. Seyed Meysam Khoshnava & Raheleh Rostami & Rosli Mohamad Zin & Dalia Štreimikienė & Alireza Yousefpour & Wadim Strielkowski & Abbas Mardani, 2019. "Aligning the Criteria of Green Economy (GE) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Implement Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Anna Misztal & Magdalena Kowalska, 2024. "Factors of green entrepreneurship in selected emerging markets in the European Union," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 28269-28292, November.
    17. Wang, Yicheng & Tao, Fulu & Chen, Yi & Yin, Lichang, 2024. "Climate mitigation potential and economic costs of natural climate solutions for main cropping systems across China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    18. Armand Kasztelan & Anna Nowak & Joanna Hawlena, 2019. "Green Growth in Agriculture in the European Union: Myth or Reality?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 35-48.
    19. Oleg RYBALKIN, 2022. "Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 3(2), pages 121-135, April.
    20. Marek Ogryzek & Krzysztof Rząsa & Ryszard Źróbek, 2021. "Change in the Level of Agricultural Development in the Context of Public Institutions’ Activities—A Case Study of the NASC Activities in Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:endesu:v:27:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10668-024-04467-y. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.