IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/coopap/v83y2022i1d10.1007_s10589-022-00381-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying uncertainty with ensembles of surrogates for blackbox optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Audet

    (Polytechnique Montréal)

  • Sébastien Le Digabel

    (Polytechnique Montréal)

  • Renaud Saltet

    (Polytechnique Montréal)

Abstract

Blackbox optimization tackles problems where the functions are expensive to evaluate and where no analytical information is available. In this context, a tried and tested technique is to build surrogates of the objective and the constraints in order to conduct the optimization at a cheaper computational cost. This work introduces an extension to a specific type of surrogates: ensembles of surrogates, enabling them to quantify the uncertainty on the predictions they produce. The resulting extended ensembles of surrogates behave as stochastic models and allow the use of efficient Bayesian optimization tools. The method is incorporated in the search step of the mesh adaptive direct search (MADS) algorithm to improve the exploration of the search space. Computational experiments are conducted on seven analytical problems, two multi-disciplinary optimization problems and two simulation problems. The results show that the proposed approach solves expensive simulation-based problems at a greater precision and with a lower computational effort than stochastic models.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Audet & Sébastien Le Digabel & Renaud Saltet, 2022. "Quantifying uncertainty with ensembles of surrogates for blackbox optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 83(1), pages 29-66, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:83:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00381-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10589-022-00381-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10589-022-00381-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10589-022-00381-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Felipe Viana & Raphael Haftka & Layne Watson, 2013. "Efficient global optimization algorithm assisted by multiple surrogate techniques," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 669-689, June.
    2. Juliane Müller & Marcus Day, 2019. "Surrogate Optimization of Computationally Expensive Black-Box Problems with Hidden Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 689-702, October.
    3. Adriano Verdério & Elizabeth W. Karas & Lucas G. Pedroso & Katya Scheinberg, 2017. "On the construction of quadratic models for derivative-free trust-region algorithms," EURO Journal on Computational Optimization, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 5(4), pages 501-527, December.
    4. Charles Audet & Michael Kokkolaras & Sébastien Le Digabel & Bastien Talgorn, 2018. "Order-based error for managing ensembles of surrogates in mesh adaptive direct search," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 645-675, March.
    5. H. Le Thi & A. Vaz & L. Vicente, 2012. "Optimizing radial basis functions by d.c. programming and its use in direct search for global derivative-free optimization," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 20(1), pages 190-214, April.
    6. Rommel Regis & Christine Shoemaker, 2005. "Constrained Global Optimization of Expensive Black Box Functions Using Radial Basis Functions," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 153-171, January.
    7. Taddy, Matthew A. & Gramacy, Robert B. & Polson, Nicholas G., 2011. "Dynamic Trees for Learning and Design," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(493), pages 109-123.
    8. A. Custódio & H. Rocha & L. Vicente, 2010. "Incorporating minimum Frobenius norm models in direct search," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 265-278, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles Audet & Michael Kokkolaras & Sébastien Le Digabel & Bastien Talgorn, 2018. "Order-based error for managing ensembles of surrogates in mesh adaptive direct search," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 645-675, March.
    2. Boukouvala, Fani & Misener, Ruth & Floudas, Christodoulos A., 2016. "Global optimization advances in Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming, MINLP, and Constrained Derivative-Free Optimization, CDFO," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(3), pages 701-727.
    3. Dawei Zhan & Huanlai Xing, 2020. "Expected improvement for expensive optimization: a review," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(3), pages 507-544, November.
    4. Zan Yang & Haobo Qiu & Liang Gao & Chen Jiang & Jinhao Zhang, 2019. "Two-layer adaptive surrogate-assisted evolutionary algorithm for high-dimensional computationally expensive problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 327-359, June.
    5. Juliane Müller & Christine Shoemaker, 2014. "Influence of ensemble surrogate models and sampling strategy on the solution quality of algorithms for computationally expensive black-box global optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 123-144, October.
    6. Fani Boukouvala & M. M. Faruque Hasan & Christodoulos A. Floudas, 2017. "Global optimization of general constrained grey-box models: new method and its application to constrained PDEs for pressure swing adsorption," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(1), pages 3-42, January.
    7. Davide Previtali & Mirko Mazzoleni & Antonio Ferramosca & Fabio Previdi, 2023. "GLISp-r: a preference-based optimization algorithm with convergence guarantees," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 86(1), pages 383-420, September.
    8. Hoseinzade, Davood & Lakzian, Esmail & Hashemian, Ali, 2021. "A blackbox optimization of volumetric heating rate for reducing the wetness of the steam flow through turbine blades," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    9. Dawei Zhan & Jiachang Qian & Yuansheng Cheng, 2017. "Balancing global and local search in parallel efficient global optimization algorithms," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 873-892, April.
    10. Rommel G. Regis & Christine A. Shoemaker, 2009. "Parallel Stochastic Global Optimization Using Radial Basis Functions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 411-426, August.
    11. Lehmann, Sebastian & Huth, Andreas, 2015. "Fast calibration of a dynamic vegetation model with minimum observation data," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 98-105.
    12. Krityakierne, Tipaluck & Baowan, Duangkamon, 2020. "Aggregated GP-based Optimization for Contaminant Source Localization," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    13. Butyn, Emerson & Karas, Elizabeth W. & de Oliveira, Welington, 2022. "A derivative-free trust-region algorithm with copula-based models for probability maximization problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 59-75.
    14. Jesús Martínez-Frutos & David Herrero-Pérez, 2016. "Kriging-based infill sampling criterion for constraint handling in multi-objective optimization," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 97-115, January.
    15. Driessen, L. & Brekelmans, R.C.M. & Gerichhausen, M. & Hamers, H.J.M. & den Hertog, D., 2006. "Why Methods for Optimization Problems with Time-Consuming Function Evaluations and Integer Variables Should Use Global Approximation Models," Other publications TiSEM 45a73d28-9fed-4b4c-a909-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Alberto Bemporad, 2020. "Global optimization via inverse distance weighting and radial basis functions," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 571-595, November.
    17. Juliane Müller & Robert Piché, 2011. "Mixture surrogate models based on Dempster-Shafer theory for global optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 79-104, September.
    18. Duarte, Belmiro P.M. & Atkinson, Anthony C. & P. Singh, Satya & S. Reis, Marco, 2023. "Optimal design of experiments for hypothesis testing on ordered treatments via intersection-union tests," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115187, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. He, Fang & Yin, Yafeng & Chen, Zhibin & Zhou, Jing, 2015. "Pricing of parking games with atomic players," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1-12.
    20. Silvia Golia & Luigi Grossi & Matteo Pelagatti, 2022. "Machine Learning Models and Intra-Daily Market Information for the Prediction of Italian Electricity Prices," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:coopap:v:83:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s10589-022-00381-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.