IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v40y2025i7d10.1007_s00180-025-01624-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing non-inferiority for three-arm trials under the PH model

Author

Listed:
  • Pao-sheng Shen

    (Tunghai University)

Abstract

The objective of non-inferiority (NI) trials is to show that a new treatment is not worse than a reference treatment by more than a pre-specified margin. For ethical reasons, NI trials usually do not include a placebo arm such that neither the assay sensitivity nor the constancy can be validated. On the other hand, three-arm NI trials consisting of the new treatment, reference treatment, and placebo, can simultaneously test the superiority of the new treatment over placebo and the NI of the new treatment compared with the reference treatment. In this article, we consider assessing NI of a new treatment in three-arm trials with time to event outcomes subject to right censoring. Under the proportional hazards model, we develop a testing procedure for assessing NI based on the infimum of ratio of survival difference between the new treatment and the placebo to that between the reference treatment and the placebo within a specific time period. The proposed test statistics involves the estimates of treatment parameters and survival function evaluated at a specific time point and their corresponding standard error estimates. Simulation study indicates that the proposed test controls the type I error well and has decent power to detect the NI under moderate to large sample settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Pao-sheng Shen, 2025. "Testing non-inferiority for three-arm trials under the PH model," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 40(7), pages 3477-3503, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01624-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-025-01624-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-025-01624-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-025-01624-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:40:y:2025:i:7:d:10.1007_s00180-025-01624-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.