IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v39y2024i4d10.1007_s00180-023-01450-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Random forest based quantile-oriented sensitivity analysis indices estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Kévin Elie-Dit-Cosaque

    (ICJ UMR5208, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Jean Monnet
    SCOR)

  • Véronique Maume-Deschamps

    (ICJ UMR5208, CNRS, Ecole Centrale de Lyon, INSA Lyon, Université Jean Monnet)

Abstract

We propose a random forest based estimation procedure for Quantile-Oriented Sensitivity Analysis—QOSA. In order to be efficient, a cross-validation step on the leaf size of trees is required. Our full estimation procedure is tested on both simulated data and a real dataset. Our estimators use either the bootstrap samples or the original sample in the estimation. Also, they are either based on a quantile plug-in procedure (the R-estimators) or on a direct minimization (the Q-estimators). This leads to 8 different estimators which are compared on simulations. From these simulations, it seems that the estimation method based on a direct minimization is better than the one plugging the quantile. This is a significant result because the method with direct minimization requires only one sample and could therefore be preferred.

Suggested Citation

  • Kévin Elie-Dit-Cosaque & Véronique Maume-Deschamps, 2024. "Random forest based quantile-oriented sensitivity analysis indices estimation," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1747-1777, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01450-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-023-01450-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-023-01450-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-023-01450-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antoniadis, Anestis & Lambert-Lacroix, Sophie & Poggi, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    2. Lin, Yi & Jeon, Yongho, 2006. "Random Forests and Adaptive Nearest Neighbors," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 578-590, June.
    3. Jean-Claude Fort & Thierry Klein & Nabil Rachdi, 2016. "New sensitivity analysis subordinated to a contrast," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(15), pages 4349-4364, August.
    4. Maume-Deschamps, Véronique & Niang, Ibrahima, 2018. "Estimation of quantile oriented sensitivity indices," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 122-127.
    5. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zdeněk Kala, 2021. "New Importance Measures Based on Failure Probability in Global Sensitivity Analysis of Reliability," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Marrel, Amandine & Chabridon, Vincent, 2021. "Statistical developments for target and conditional sensitivity analysis: Application on safety studies for nuclear reactor," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    3. Tobias Fissler & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2022. "Sensitivity Measures Based on Scoring Functions," Papers 2203.00460, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    4. Torii, André Jacomel & Novotny, Antonio André, 2021. "A priori error estimates for local reliability-based sensitivity analysis with Monte Carlo Simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    5. Song, Shufang & Bai, Zhiwei & Kucherenko, Sergei & Wang, Lu & Yang, Caiqiong, 2021. "Quantile sensitivity measures based on subset simulation importance sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Fissler, Tobias & Pesenti, Silvana M., 2023. "Sensitivity measures based on scoring functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1408-1423.
    7. Uguccioni, James, 2022. "The long-run effects of parental unemployment in childhood," CLEF Working Paper Series 45, Canadian Labour Economics Forum (CLEF), University of Waterloo.
    8. Kucherenko, Sergei & Song, Shufang & Wang, Lu, 2019. "Quantile based global sensitivity measures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 35-48.
    9. Ballester-Ripoll, Rafael & Leonelli, Manuele, 2022. "Computing Sobol indices in probabilistic graphical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    10. Gao, Zhikun & Yu, Junqi & Zhao, Anjun & Hu, Qun & Yang, Siyuan, 2022. "A hybrid method of cooling load forecasting for large commercial building based on extreme learning machine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).
    11. Ke-Lin Du & Rengong Zhang & Bingchun Jiang & Jie Zeng & Jiabin Lu, 2025. "Foundations and Innovations in Data Fusion and Ensemble Learning for Effective Consensus," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-49, February.
    12. Guoyi Zhang & Yan Lu, 2012. "Bias-corrected random forests in regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 151-160, March.
    13. Philippe Goulet Coulombe, 2024. "The macroeconomy as a random forest," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 401-421, April.
    14. Goldstein Benjamin A & Polley Eric C & Briggs Farren B. S., 2011. "Random Forests for Genetic Association Studies," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-34, July.
    15. Borup, Daniel & Christensen, Bent Jesper & Mühlbach, Nicolaj Søndergaard & Nielsen, Mikkel Slot, 2023. "Targeting predictors in random forest regression," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 841-868.
    16. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    17. Dela Rosa & Berna Elya & Muhammad Hanafi & Alfi Khatib & Eka Budiarto & Syamsu Nur & Muhammad Imam Surya, 2025. "Investigation of alpha-glucosidase inhibition activity of Artabotrys sumatranus leaf extract using metabolomics, machine learning and molecular docking analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Jerinsh Jeyapaulraj & Dhruv Desai & Peter Chu & Dhagash Mehta & Stefano Pasquali & Philip Sommer, 2022. "Supervised similarity learning for corporate bonds using Random Forest proximities," Papers 2207.04368, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    19. Mehdi Dasineh & Amir Ghaderi & Mohammad Bagherzadeh & Mohammad Ahmadi & Alban Kuriqi, 2021. "Prediction of Hydraulic Jumps on a Triangular Bed Roughness Using Numerical Modeling and Soft Computing Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-24, December.
    20. repec:plo:pone00:0191435 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Sexton, Joseph & Laake, Petter, 2009. "Standard errors for bagged and random forest estimators," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 801-811, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:39:y:2024:i:4:d:10.1007_s00180-023-01450-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.