IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v35y2020i3d10.1007_s00180-019-00938-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

One-sided cross-validation for nonsmooth density functions

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Y. Savchuk

    (University of South Florida)

Abstract

One-sided cross-validation (OSCV) is a bandwidth selection method initially introduced by Hart and Yi (J Am Stat Assoc 93(442):620–631, 1998) in the context of smooth regression functions. Martínez-Miranda et al. (in Gregoriou (ed) Operational risk towards basel III: best practices and issues in modeling, management and regulation, Wiley, Hoboken, 2009) developed a version of OSCV for smooth density functions. This article extends the method for nonsmooth densities. It also introduces the fully robust OSCV modification that produces consistent OSCV bandwidths for both smooth and nonsmooth cases. Practical implementations of the OSCV method for smooth and nonsmooth densities are discussed. One of the considered cross-validation kernels has potential for improving the OSCV method’s performance in the regression context.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Y. Savchuk, 2020. "One-sided cross-validation for nonsmooth density functions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 1253-1272, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:35:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-019-00938-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-019-00938-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-019-00938-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s00180-019-00938-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Köhler & Anja Schindler & Stefan Sperlich, 2014. "A Review and Comparison of Bandwidth Selection Methods for Kernel Regression," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 243-274, August.
    2. Mammen, Enno & Martínez Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Sperlich, Stefan, 2011. "Do-Validation for Kernel Density Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 106(494), pages 651-660.
    3. Savchuk, Olga Y. & Hart, Jeffrey D. & Sheather, Simon J., 2010. "Indirect Cross-Validation for Density Estimation," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(489), pages 415-423.
    4. María Luz Gámiz & Enno Mammen & María Dolores Martínez Miranda & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2016. "Double one-sided cross-validation of local linear hazards," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 755-779, September.
    5. C. Tenreiro, 2017. "A weighted least-squares cross-validation bandwidth selector for kernel density estimation," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(7), pages 3438-3458, April.
    6. Olga Y. Savchuk & Jeffrey D. Hart & Simon P. Sheather, 2013. "One-sided cross-validation for nonsmooth regression functions," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 889-904, December.
    7. Olga Y. Savchuk & Jeffrey D. Hart, 2017. "Fully robust one-sided cross-validation for regression functions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1003-1025, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Y. Savchuk & Jeffrey D. Hart, 2017. "Fully robust one-sided cross-validation for regression functions," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1003-1025, September.
    2. Gámiz, María Luz & Mammen, Enno & Martínez-Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2022. "Missing link survival analysis with applications to available pandemic data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Karim M Abadir & Michel Lubrano, 2024. "Explicit solutions for the asymptotically optimal bandwidth in cross-validation," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(3), pages 809-823.
    4. Gámiz Pérez, M. Luz & Martínez Miranda, María Dolores & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2013. "Smoothing survival densities in practice," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 368-382.
    5. M. Hiabu & E. Mammen & M. D. Martìnez-Miranda & J. P. Nielsen, 2016. "In-sample forecasting with local linear survival densities," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(4), pages 843-859.
    6. María Luz Gámiz & Enno Mammen & María Dolores Martínez Miranda & Jens Perch Nielsen, 2016. "Double one-sided cross-validation of local linear hazards," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(4), pages 755-779, September.
    7. Nils-Bastian Heidenreich & Anja Schindler & Stefan Sperlich, 2013. "Bandwidth selection for kernel density estimation: a review of fully automatic selectors," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 97(4), pages 403-433, October.
    8. Max Köhler & Anja Schindler & Stefan Sperlich, 2014. "A Review and Comparison of Bandwidth Selection Methods for Kernel Regression," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 82(2), pages 243-274, August.
    9. Bischofberger, Stephan M. & Hiabu, Munir & Mammen, Enno & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2019. "A comparison of in-sample forecasting methods," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 133-154.
    10. Fritz, Marlon, 2019. "Steady state adjusting trends using a data-driven local polynomial regression," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 312-325.
    11. José María Sarabia & Faustino Prieto & Vanesa Jordá & Stefan Sperlich, 2020. "A Note on Combining Machine Learning with Statistical Modeling for Financial Data Analysis," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-14, April.
    12. El Heda, Khadijetou & Louani, Djamal, 2018. "Optimal bandwidth selection in kernel density estimation for continuous time dependent processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 9-19.
    13. Jan Koláček & Ivana Horová, 2017. "Bandwidth matrix selectors for kernel regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 1027-1046, September.
    14. Stefan Sperlich, 2022. "Comments on: hybrid semiparametric Bayesian networks," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(2), pages 335-339, June.
    15. repec:grz:wpaper:2012-10 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Scholz, Michael & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Sperlich, Stefan, 2015. "Nonparametric prediction of stock returns based on yearly data: The long-term view," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 143-155.
    17. Scholz, Michael & Sperlich, Stefan & Nielsen, Jens Perch, 2016. "Nonparametric long term prediction of stock returns with generated bond yields," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 82-96.
    18. Juan M. Rodriguez-Poo & Alexandra Soberon & Stefan Sperlich, 2025. "Inference on panel data models with a generalized factor structure," Papers 2506.10690, arXiv.org.
    19. James Wolter, 2015. "Kernel Estimation Of Hazard Functions When Observations Have Dependent and Common Covariates," Economics Series Working Papers 761, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    20. Wolter, James Lewis, 2016. "Kernel estimation of hazard functions when observations have dependent and common covariates," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 1-16.
    21. Carlos Tenreiro, 2022. "On automatic kernel density estimate-based tests for goodness-of-fit," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 31(3), pages 717-748, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:35:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s00180-019-00938-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.