IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/compst/v33y2018i1d10.1007_s00180-017-0741-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study and sensitivity analysis of skewed spatial processes

Author

Listed:
  • Jiangyan Wang

    () (Nanjing Audit University)

  • Miao Yang

    (Oregon State University)

  • Anandamayee Majumdar

    (Soochow University
    North South University)

Abstract

Abstract Asymmetric spatial processes arise naturally in finance, economics, hydrology and ecology. For such processes, two different classes of models are considered in this paper. One of them, proposed by Majumdar and Paul (J Comput Graph Stat 25(3):727–747, 2016), is the Double Zero Expectile Normal (DZEXPN) process and the other is a version of the “skewed normal process”, proposed by Minozzo and Ferracuti (Chil J Stat 3:157–170, 2012), with closed skew normal multivariate marginal distributions. Both spatial models have useful properties in the sense that they are ergodic and stationary. As a brief treatise to test the sensitivity and flexibility of the new proposed DZEXPN model (Majumdar and Paul in J Comput Graph Stat 25(3):727–747, 2016), in relation to other skewed spatial processes in the literature using a Bayesian methodology, our results show that by adding measurement error to the DZEXPN model, a reasonably flexible model is obtained, which is also computationally tractable than many others mentioned in the literature. Meanwhile, we develop a full-fledged Bayesian methodology for the estimation and prediction of the skew normal process proposed in Minozzo and Ferracuti (Chil J Stat 3:157–170, 2012). Specifically, a hierarchical model is used to describe the skew normal process and a computationally efficient MCMC scheme is employed to obtain samples from the posterior distributions. Under a Bayesian paradigm, we compare the performances of the aforementioned three different spatial processes and study their sensitivity and robustness based on simulated examples. We further apply them to a skewed data set on maximum annual temperature obtained from weather stations in Louisiana and Texas.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiangyan Wang & Miao Yang & Anandamayee Majumdar, 2018. "Comparative study and sensitivity analysis of skewed spatial processes," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 75-98, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0741-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s00180-017-0741-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00180-017-0741-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marco Minozzo, 2011. "On the existence of some skew normal stationary processes," Working Papers 20/2011, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    2. Hosseini, Fatemeh & Eidsvik, Jo & Mohammadzadeh, Mohsen, 2011. "Approximate Bayesian inference in spatial GLMM with skew normal latent variables," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(4), pages 1791-1806, April.
    3. Arjun Gupta & John Chen, 2004. "A class of multivariate skew-normal models," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(2), pages 305-315, June.
    4. Adelchi Azzalini, 2005. "The Skew‐normal Distribution and Related Multivariate Families," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 32(2), pages 159-188, June.
    5. Schnabel, Sabine K. & Eilers, Paul H.C., 2009. "Optimal expectile smoothing," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4168-4177, October.
    6. Jones, M. C., 1994. "Expectiles and M-quantiles are quantiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 149-153, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:compst:v:33:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00180-017-0741-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.