IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/chinre/v18y2025i1d10.1007_s12187-024-10188-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deliberation, Polarization, and Emotion: A Deliberative Process about Climate Change with Young Participants

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Montenegro Brasileiro

    (São Paulo State University)

  • Patricia García-Leiva

    (University of Málaga)

  • M. Soledad Palacios-Gálvez

    (University of Huelva)

  • Marta Barros González

    (University of Málaga)

Abstract

In light of the increase in democratic innovation processes in recent decades, there is ongoing debate as to whether deliberative participation reduces levels of affective and issue-based political polarisation. This field study analyses the role of emotions in a deliberative process about climate change conducted by the AOS! Programme in Spain in 2022. 137 participants aged 10–12 years organised into mixed and enclave groups answered a survey to determine their level of concern about climate change and both affective and issue-based polarisation, in order to assess whether feeling worried about climate change could influence their level of political polarisation. The results show that neither the enclave nor the mixed groups had significant effects on their affective polarisation, as the children only answered according to their level of concern about climate change. However, participation influenced their levels of issue-based polarisation, depolarising less worried participants. These findings demonstrate that emotions have an impact on cognition through participation and that feelings about political topics should be considered in deliberative studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Montenegro Brasileiro & Patricia García-Leiva & M. Soledad Palacios-Gálvez & Marta Barros González, 2025. "Deliberation, Polarization, and Emotion: A Deliberative Process about Climate Change with Young Participants," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 18(1), pages 33-56, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12187-024-10188-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s12187-024-10188-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12187-024-10188-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s12187-024-10188-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elisabeth Eide & Risto Kunelius, 2021. "Voices of a generation the communicative power of youth activism," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Nazly Guiselly Albornoz-Manyoma & Patricia García-Leiva & María Soledad Palacios-Gálvez, 2021. "Longitudinal Study of the Psychosocial Effects of Political Participation by Children: the ‘Ágora Infantil’ Programme," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(5), pages 2083-2096, October.
    3. Fishkin, James & Siu, Alice & Diamond, Larry & Bradburn, Norman, 2021. "Is Deliberation an Antidote to Extreme Partisan Polarization? Reflections on “America in One Room”," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 115(4), pages 1464-1481, November.
    4. Genevieve Fuji Johnson & Michael E. Morrell & Laura W. Black, 2019. "Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens’ Initiative Review," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 100(6), pages 2168-2187, October.
    5. Ana-Maria Bliuc & Craig McGarty & Emma F. Thomas & Girish Lala & Mariette Berndsen & RoseAnne Misajon, 2015. "Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(3), pages 226-229, March.
    6. Videras, Julio & Owen, Ann L. & Conover, Emily & Wu, Stephen, 2012. "The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 35-50.
    7. Alison N. Novak, 2024. "News coverage of climate change and generation Z," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(5), pages 1-19, May.
    8. Kelly S. Fielding & Matthew J. Hornsey & Ha Anh Thai & Li Li Toh, 2020. "Using ingroup messengers and ingroup values to promote climate change policy," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 181-199, January.
    9. Sanders, David, 2012. "The Effects of Deliberative Polling in an EU-wide Experiment: Five Mechanisms in Search of an Explanation," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(3), pages 617-640, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phu Nguyen-Van & Anne Stenger & Tuyen Tiet, 2021. "Social incentive factors in interventions promoting sustainable behaviors: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, December.
    2. Juan Wang & Yongbo Li, 2024. "Do subjective well-being influence people’s willingness to pay for improved air quality: evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7857-7879, March.
    3. Aaron C. Sparks & Heather Hodges & Sarah Oliver & Eric R. A. N. Smith, 2020. "Confidence in Local, National, and International Scientists on Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Yanqing Song & Han Bao & Shan Shen, 2022. "Understanding the Influence of Initial Values of College Students in Shaping Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, August.
    5. Eugene Y. Chan & Jack Lin, 2022. "Political ideology and psychological reactance: how serious should climate change be?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-22, May.
    6. Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Kądziela, Tadeusz & Hanley, Nick, 2014. "We want to sort! Assessing households’ preferences for sorting waste," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 290-306.
    7. Lee, Joung Hun & Iwasa, Yoh, 2012. "Optimal investment for enhancing social concern about biodiversity conservation: A dynamic approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(3), pages 177-186.
    8. Nathanael Johnson & Torsten Reimer, 2023. "Using the social identity model of pro-environmental behavior to predict support for the adoption of solar panels," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(4), pages 587-601, December.
    9. Mortoja, Md. Golam & Yigitcanlar, Tan, 2022. "Understanding political bias in climate change belief: A public perception study from South East Queensland," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    10. James N. Druckman & Donald P. Green & Shanto Iyengar, 2023. "Does Affective Polarization Contribute to Democratic Backsliding in America?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 708(1), pages 137-163, July.
    11. Heinz Welsch & Jan Kühling, 2016. "Green status seeking and endogenous reference standards," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(4), pages 625-643, October.
    12. Leininger, Julia, 2022. "International democracy promotion in times of autocratization: From supporting to protecting democracy," IDOS Discussion Papers 21/2022, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    13. Johannes Bettin & Meike Wollni, 2020. "Environmental Concern and Urbanization in India: Towards Psychological Complexity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Rees, Siân E. & Fletcher, Stephen & Gall, Sarah C. & Friedrich, Laura A. & Jackson, Emma L. & Rodwell, Lynda D., 2014. "Securing the benefits: Linking ecology with marine planning policy to examine the potential of a network of Marine Protected Areas to support human wellbeing," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 335-341.
    15. Pierce, Jonathan J. & Boudet, Hilary & Zanocco, Chad & Hillyard, Megan, 2018. "Analyzing the factors that influence U.S. public support for exporting natural gas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 666-674.
    16. Knollenborg, Leonard & Sommer, Stephan, 2021. "Diverging beliefs on climate change and climate policy in Germany: The role of political orientations," Ruhr Economic Papers 909, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Alison Gee & Craig McGarty & Michelle Banfield, 2015. "What Drives Systemic Mental Health Advocates? Goals, Strategies, and Values of Australian Consumer and Carer Advocacy Organizations," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    18. Robyn E. Gulliver & Xiongzhi Wang & Winnifred R. Louis & Kelly S. Fielding & Rebecca M. Colvin, 2025. "Media ownership and coverage patterns of established, disruptive, and unconventional climate advocacy groups," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 178(2), pages 1-24, February.
    19. Gang Cui & Zhicheng Liu, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Regulations and Social Norms on Farmers’ Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Behaviors: An Investigation of Citrus Farmers in Southern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-19, July.
    20. Czajkowski, Mikolaj & Hanley, Nicholas & Nyborg, Karine, 2014. "Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviour," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2014-06, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:chinre:v:18:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s12187-024-10188-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.