IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/cejnor/v27y2019i1d10.1007_s10100-017-0494-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exact approach for the r-interdiction covering problem with fortification

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Costa Roboredo

    (Universidade Federal Fluminense)

  • Luiz Aizemberg

    (Banco Nacional do Desenvolvimento)

  • Artur Alves Pessoa

    (Universidade Federal Fluminense)

Abstract

In this paper we treat the r-interdiction covering problem with fortification (RICF). The environment of this problem is composed of a set of customers J and a set of facilities I. For each customer j, there is set of facilities containing the facilities that can cover the demand of j. The system efficiency is given by the sum of the total covered demand. The facilities are subject to interdictions. When a facility is interdicted, it can not cover the demand of any customer. To mitigate the negative impact of the interdictions on the system efficiency, the system planner can fortify a subset of facilities. If a facility is fortified then it can not be interdicted. The RICF consists of choosing q facilities to be fortified knowing that r not fortified facilities will be interdicted at the worst case. We propose a branch-and-cut algorithm for the problem. Our results are compared with the exact method found in the literature, being faster for the most instances, mainly the large ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Costa Roboredo & Luiz Aizemberg & Artur Alves Pessoa, 2019. "An exact approach for the r-interdiction covering problem with fortification," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 27(1), pages 111-131, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-017-0494-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10100-017-0494-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10100-017-0494-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10100-017-0494-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuan, Wei & Zhao, Long & Zeng, Bo, 2014. "Optimal power grid protection through a defender–attacker–defender model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 83-89.
    2. Roboredo, Marcos Costa & Pessoa, Artur Alves, 2013. "A branch-and-cut algorithm for the discrete (r∣p)-centroid problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 101-109.
    3. Gerald Brown & Matthew Carlyle & Javier Salmerón & Kevin Wood, 2006. "Defending Critical Infrastructure," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 530-544, December.
    4. O'Hanley, Jesse R. & Church, Richard L., 2011. "Designing robust coverage networks to hedge against worst-case facility losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 23-36, February.
    5. Lawrence V. Snyder & Zümbül Atan & Peng Peng & Ying Rong & Amanda J. Schmitt & Burcu Sinsoysal, 2016. "OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 89-109, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiyong Xiao & Pei Yang & Siyue Zhang & Shenghan Zhou & Wenbing Chang & Yue Zhang, 2020. "Dynamic Gaming Case of the R-Interdiction Median Problem with Fortification and an MILP-Based Solution Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, January.
    2. Kübra Tanınmış & Markus Sinnl, 2022. "A Branch-and-Cut Algorithm for Submodular Interdiction Games," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2634-2657, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gentile, José & Alves Pessoa, Artur & Poss, Michael & Costa Roboredo, Marcos, 2018. "Integer programming formulations for three sequential discrete competitive location problems with foresight," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 872-881.
    2. Losada, Chaya & Scaparra, M. Paola & O’Hanley, Jesse R., 2012. "Optimizing system resilience: A facility protection model with recovery time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 519-530.
    3. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    4. Starita, Stefano & Scaparra, Maria Paola, 2016. "Optimizing dynamic investment decisions for railway systems protection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 543-557.
    5. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Ralphs, Ted K. & Xue, Zhaojie, 2016. "The competitive facility location problem under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 453-473.
    6. Leitner, Markus & Ljubić, Ivana & Monaci, Michele & Sinnl, Markus & Tanınmış, Kübra, 2023. "An exact method for binary fortification games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1026-1039.
    7. Tian, Meng & Dong, Zhengcheng & Gong, Li & Wang, Xianpei, 2024. "Line hardening strategies for resilient power systems considering cyber-topology interdependence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Yan, Xihong & Ren, Xiaorong & Nie, Xiaofeng, 2022. "A budget allocation model for domestic airport network protection," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
    9. Fang, Yiping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "Optimizing power system investments and resilience against attacks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 161-173.
    10. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2017. "Responsive contingency planning of capacitated supply networks under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 13-37.
    11. Smith, J. Cole & Song, Yongjia, 2020. "A survey of network interdiction models and algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 797-811.
    12. Jiang, J. & Liu, X., 2018. "Multi-objective Stackelberg game model for water supply networks against interdictions with incomplete information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 920-933.
    13. Sarhadi, Hassan & Tulett, David M. & Verma, Manish, 2017. "An analytical approach to the protection planning of a rail intermodal terminal network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 511-525.
    14. Lin, Yanling & Bie, Zhaohong, 2018. "Tri-level optimal hardening plan for a resilient distribution system considering reconfiguration and DG islanding," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1266-1279.
    15. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle & R. Kevin Wood, 2018. "Assessing and Improving the Operational Resilience of a Large Highway Infrastructure System to Worst-Case Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 1012-1034, August.
    16. Matthews, Logan R. & Gounaris, Chrysanthos E. & Kevrekidis, Ioannis G., 2019. "Designing networks with resiliency to edge failures using two-stage robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 704-720.
    17. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Zhang, Runfa & Gan, Jianyuan, 2021. "A stochastic bilevel model for facility location-protection problem with the most likely interdiction strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Yongzhen Li & Xueping Li & Jia Shu & Miao Song & Kaike Zhang, 2022. "A General Model and Efficient Algorithms for Reliable Facility Location Problem Under Uncertain Disruptions," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 407-426, January.
    19. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H., 2021. "Attacker–defender model against quantal response adversaries for cyber security in logistics management: An introductory study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 471-481.
    20. Casorrán, Carlos & Fortz, Bernard & Labbé, Martine & Ordóñez, Fernando, 2019. "A study of general and security Stackelberg game formulations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(3), pages 855-868.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:cejnor:v:27:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10100-017-0494-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.