IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/astaws/v11y2017i3d10.1007_s11943-017-0216-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strukturelle Unterschiede zwischen positiven und negativen Einkünften – eine Untersuchung der einkommensteuerlichen Verlusteinkunftsarten Gewerbebetrieb sowie Vermietung und Verpachtung auf Basis des Taxpayer-Panels
[Structural differences between profits and losses: An analysis of income from business and rental income based on the German taxpayer panel]

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Wegener

    (Ruhr-Universität Bochum)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Empirische Studien, welche sich mit der Erzielung negativer Einkünfte in der Einkommensteuer auseinandersetzen, haben zwei „Verlusteinkunftsarten“ identifiziert – die Einkünfte aus Gewerbebetrieb sowie die Einkünfte aus Vermietung und Verpachtung – und gezeigt, dass sich diese beiden Einkunftsarten hinsichtlich der Dauer der Verlusterzielung erheblich unterscheiden. In dem vorliegenden Beitrag werden die Wanderungsbewegungen von Steuerpflichtigen zwischen den Zuständen der Erzielung positiver, negativer oder keiner Einkünfte in diesen Verlusteinkunftsarten erstmals mittels Übergangswahrscheinlichkeiten beschrieben. Ihre Bestimmung erfolgt unter Zuhilfenahme eines Markov-Modells für mehrere aufeinanderfolgende Veranlagungszeiträume und basiert auf Daten des Taxpayer-Panels für die Veranlagungszeiträume 2001 bis 2006. Ein zentrales Ergebnis der Untersuchung lautet, dass die jeweils höchsten Übergangswahrscheinlichkeiten für die persistente Erzielung von Einkünften gelten – also die dauerhafte Erzielung ausschließlich positiver, negativer oder keiner Einkünfte in den genannten Einkunftsarten. Darüber hinaus werden der Eintritt in die Einkunftsart und die Aufgabe der Einkunftsart näher betrachtet. Schließlich wird untersucht, ob die Entwicklung der Einkünfte in der jeweiligen Einkunftsart einem Markov-Prozess unterliegt. Die Entwicklung der Einkünfte aus Gewerbebetrieb folgt einem Markov-Prozess 3. Ordnung, die im jeweiligen Veranlagungsjahr beobachteten Einkünfte werden also von den drei vorhergehenden Veranlagungszeiträumen beeinflusst. Für die Einkünfte aus Vermietung und Verpachtung kann ein solcher Markov-Prozess nicht nachgewiesen werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Wegener, 2017. "Strukturelle Unterschiede zwischen positiven und negativen Einkünften – eine Untersuchung der einkommensteuerlichen Verlusteinkunftsarten Gewerbebetrieb sowie Vermietung und Verpachtung auf Basis des ," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 11(3), pages 177-204, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:11:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-017-0216-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s11943-017-0216-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11943-017-0216-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11943-017-0216-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, Michael G. & Knittel, Matthew J, 2010. "The Implications of Tax Asymmetry for U.S. Corporations," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(1), pages 33-61, March.
    2. Alan J. Auerbach & James M. Poterba, 1987. "Tax-Loss Carryforwards and Corporate Tax Incentives," NBER Chapters, in: Taxes and Capital Formation, pages 89-92, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Bull, Nicholas & Cilke, James & Giosa, Christopher P. & Larson, C. Erik, 2004. "The Persistence of Individual and Corporate Capital Gains and Losses," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 57(3), pages 525-545, September.
    4. Martin Feldstein, 1987. "The Effects of Taxation on Capital Accumulation," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number feld87-1, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timo Schmid & Markus Zwick, 2017. "Vorwort der Herausgeber," AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv, Springer;Deutsche Statistische Gesellschaft - German Statistical Society, vol. 11(3), pages 143-146, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schneider, Georg & Sureth, Caren, 2010. "The impact of profit taxation on capitalized investment with options to delay and divest," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 97, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Ortmann, Regina & Sureth, Caren, 2014. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 165, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    3. Regina Ortmann & Caren Sureth-Sloane, 2016. "Can the CCCTB alleviate tax discrimination against loss-making European multinational groups?," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(5), pages 441-475, July.
    4. Bührle, Anna Theresa & Spengel, Christoph, 2019. "Tax law and the transfer of start-up losses: A European overview and categorization," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-037, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Javier Ávila Mahecha & Jorge Enrique Ramos-Forero, 2017. "The Effect of Corporate Taxes on Investment: Evidence from the Colombian Firms," IHEID Working Papers 10-2017, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    6. Lund, Diderik, 2009. "Marginal versus Average Beta of Equity under Corporate Taxation," Memorandum 12/2009, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    7. Masanori Orihara, 2016. "Corporate tax asymmetries and R&D: Evidence from a tax reform for business groups in Japan," Discussion papers ron273, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    8. Niemann, Rainer, 2007. "Risikoübernahme, Arbeitsanreiz und differenzierende Besteuerung," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 28, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    9. Masanori Orihara, 2015. "Tax loss carryforwards and corporate behavior," Discussion papers ron271, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    10. Daniel Dreßler & Michael Overesch, 2013. "Investment impact of tax loss treatment—empirical insights from a panel of multinationals," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(3), pages 513-543, June.
    11. Kunieda, Shigeki & 國枝, 繁樹 & Takahata, Junichiro & 高畑, 純一郎 & Yada, Haruna & 矢田, 晴那, 2011. "Japanese Firms’ Debt Policy And Tax Policy," Discussion Papers 2011-11, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    12. Bronwyn Hall, 1992. "R&D Tax Policy During the Eighties: Success or Failure?," NBER Working Papers 4240, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Pierre-Pascal Gendron, 1996. "Corporation Tax Asymmetries: An Oligopolistic Supergame Analysis," Working Papers ecpap-96-04, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    14. James M. Poterba & Steven F. Venti & David A. Wise, 1996. "How Retirement Saving Programs Increase Saving," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 91-112, Fall.
    15. Hubbard, R. Glenn & Skinner, Jonathan & Zeldes, Stephen P., 1994. "The importance of precautionary motives in explaining individual and aggregate saving," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 59-125, June.
    16. Andreas Peichl, 2009. "The Benefits and Problems of Linking Micro and Macro Models — Evidence from a Flat Tax Analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 301-329, November.
    17. Joseph Gyourko & Todd Sinai, "undated". "The Spatial Distribution of Housing-Related Tax Benefits in the United States," Zell/Lurie Center Working Papers 399, Wharton School Samuel Zell and Robert Lurie Real Estate Center, University of Pennsylvania.
    18. Rainer Niemann, 2004. "Asymmetric Taxation and Cross-Border Investment Decisions," CESifo Working Paper Series 1219, CESifo.
    19. Rainer Niemann & Corinna Treisch, 2005. "Group Taxation, Asymmetric Taxation and Cross-Border Investment Incentives in Austria," CESifo Working Paper Series 1506, CESifo.
    20. Hendershott, Patric H & Peek, Joe, 1992. "Treasury Bill Rates in the 1970s and 1980s," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 24(2), pages 195-214, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:astaws:v:11:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s11943-017-0216-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.