Author
Abstract
This qualitative study explores the perceptions and experiences of college students, faculty, and administrators on mental well-being pre-and-post COVID-19 pandemic. The study used an exploratory sequential design, and this manuscript presented findings from the qualitative (phase one) data collected through in-depth interviews with students, faculty, and administrators (N = 20). Interviews were conducted in person and virtually, audio recorded, and transcribed verbatim. An inductive thematic analysis was undertaken using a comprehensive codebook and Nvivo14 software. The findings revealed three major categories of views and experiences based on the timeframes around COVID-19 and campus closure: (a) pre-pandemic, (b) during the pandemic, and (c) post-pandemic (after the reopening of campus). Views on pre-pandemic demonstrated that in-person learning is better for mental well-being, having a structure reduces stress, and the real college experience positively impacts mental well-being. The pandemic period was characterized as overwhelming and stressful, complex, and mixed spaces of work and life, dominated by feelings of isolation, lack of motivation, and anxiety. The post-pandemic period was filled with mixed feelings of excitement and the burden of readjustment. The re-opening of campus did not mean coming back to the pre-pandemic state; feelings of anxiety and trauma from the pandemic days continued. The period was marked by declined support that created a mental burden, but also important lessons were learned on how to maintain mental well-being. As colleges navigate the post-pandemic landscape, it is imperative to maintain a focus on mental wellness, integrating preventive measures, crisis response strategies, and continuous evaluation of mental health services.
Suggested Citation
Gashaye Melaku Tefera & Omoshola Kehinde & Abigail Olajire & Ifeolu David & Douglas Odongo & Kelechi Onyeaka & Mary Dickson-Amagada & Wilson Majee, 2025.
"Mental Wellbeing in the Pre-and Post-Pandemic Era: Perspectives of U.S. College Students, Faculty, and Administrators,"
Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 257-277, February.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11482-024-10409-7
DOI: 10.1007/s11482-024-10409-7
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ariqol:v:20:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s11482-024-10409-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.