IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v348y2025i3d10.1007_s10479-022-05147-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platform-leading blockchain adoption for traceability under upstream competition

Author

Listed:
  • Jianghua Wu

    (Renmin University of China)

  • Xin Wang

    (Renmin University of China)

Abstract

Customers are facing quality uncertainty when purchasing though ecommerce platforms, which may hinder their purchase intention. The platform can use the traceability of blockchain technology to alleviate consumers’ doubts. We construct a game theoretical model to investigate the issue of platform-leading blockchain adoption in a supply chain where heterogenous suppliers sell products through the platform. There are different selling modes depending on whether the platform cooperates with suppliers as a marketplace (agency contract) or a reseller (reselling contract) or both (hybrid contracts). We find that blockchain would be adopted to improve the efficiency of the supply chain when suppliers have enough capabilities to provide high-quality product regardless of selling modes. Furthermore, the platform’s leadership in adopting blockchain benefits the entire supply chain. It stimulates the platform to provide subsidies for the capable suppliers to solve the incentive mismatch between suppliers and himself. We also make the comparison of blockchain adoption in different selling modes. In particular, we find that the platform is most likely to adopt blockchain when the supplier with higher quality management capability uses the agency contract and another supplier uses the reselling contract. If the suppliers use the same contract, the supply chain usually accepts a higher cost under the pure agency contract, however, it may not be true when the commission rate is very low and the upstream competition is relatively fierce.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianghua Wu & Xin Wang, 2025. "Platform-leading blockchain adoption for traceability under upstream competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 348(3), pages 2107-2143, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:348:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05147-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-022-05147-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-022-05147-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-022-05147-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuelin Shen & Sean P. Willems & Yue Dai, 2019. "Channel Selection and Contracting in the Presence of a Retail Platform," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(5), pages 1173-1185, May.
    2. Tim Kraft & León Valdés & Yanchong Zheng, 2020. "Motivating Supplier Social Responsibility Under Incomplete Visibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1268-1286, November.
    3. Lin Tian & Asoo J. Vakharia & Yinliang (Ricky) Tan & Yifan Xu, 2018. "Marketplace, Reseller, or Hybrid: Strategic Analysis of an Emerging E‐Commerce Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(8), pages 1595-1610, August.
    4. Saak, Alexander E., 2016. "Traceability and reputation in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 149-162.
    5. Wei, Yuansheng & Dong, Yuxuan, 2022. "Product distribution strategy in response to the platform retailer's marketplace introduction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 986-996.
    6. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    7. Fuqiang Zhang & Xiaole Wu & Christopher S. Tang & Tianjun Feng & Yue Dai, 2020. "Evolution of Operations Management Research: from Managing Flows to Building Capabilities," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(10), pages 2219-2229, October.
    8. Robert Swinney, 2011. "Selling to Strategic Consumers When Product Value Is Uncertain: The Value of Matching Supply and Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(10), pages 1737-1751, October.
    9. Aiello, Giuseppe & Enea, Mario & Muriana, Cinzia, 2015. "The expected value of the traceability information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 176-186.
    10. Vibhanshu Abhishek & Kinshuk Jerath & Z. John Zhang, 2016. "Agency Selling or Reselling? Channel Structures in Electronic Retailing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(8), pages 2259-2280, August.
    11. Volodymyr Babich & Gilles Hilary, 2020. "OM Forum—Distributed Ledgers and Operations: What Operations Management Researchers Should Know About Blockchain Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 223-245, March.
    12. Gabriella M. Hastig & ManMohan S. Sodhi, 2020. "Blockchain for Supply Chain Traceability: Business Requirements and Critical Success Factors," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 935-954, April.
    13. Yao, Shiqing & Zhu, Kaijie, 2020. "Combating product label misconduct: The role of traceability and market inspection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(2), pages 559-568.
    14. Hubert Pun & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Pengwen Hou, 2021. "Blockchain Adoption for Combating Deceptive Counterfeits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(4), pages 864-882, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma, Deqing & Hu, Jinsong, 2022. "The optimal combination between blockchain and sales format in an internet platform-based closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    2. De-Qing Ma & Xiao-Qing Wang & Xue Wang & Jin-Song Hu, 2023. "Achieving Triple Benefits in a Platform-Based Closed-Loop Supply Chain: The Optimal Combination between Recycling Channel and Blockchain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-40, February.
    3. Suyuan Luo & Tsan‐Ming Choi, 2022. "E‐commerce supply chains with considerations of cyber‐security: Should governments play a role?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2107-2126, May.
    4. Zhou, Yu & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Suyuan & Xiong, Yu & Ye, Niangyue, 2022. "Anti-Counterfeiting in a retail Platform: A Game-Theoretic approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    5. Deqing Ma & Pengcheng Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2024. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Adoption on an E-Commerce Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumer Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-41, February.
    6. Lingxiu Dong & Puping (Phil) Jiang & Fasheng Xu, 2023. "Impact of Traceability Technology Adoption in Food Supply Chain Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(3), pages 1518-1535, March.
    7. Zhao, Qingli & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Sun, Minghe, 2024. "Sales mode selection and blockchain technology adoption decisions in a platform supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    8. Ma, Deqing & Li, Kaifu & Hu, Jinsong & Wang, Xue, 2024. "How to leverage blockchain to react to consumer reference effects and develop a distribution strategy in online retailing?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    9. Xu, Xiaoping & He, Ping & Zhou, Li & Cheng, T.C.E., 2023. "Coordination of a platform-based supply chain in the marketplace or reselling mode considering cross-channel effect and blockchain technology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(1), pages 170-187.
    10. Niu, Baozhuang & Ruan, Yiyuan & Xu, Haotao, 2023. "Turn a blind eye? E-tailer's blockchain participation considering upstream competition between copycats and brands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    11. Wei, Lin & Zheng, Shengming & Du, Shaofu & Zhang, Baofeng, 2025. "Agency selling or reselling: The role of cause marketing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(2), pages 343-357.
    12. Li, Ling & Yan, Shiyi & Peng, Shuxia & Hou, Pengwen, 2025. "The interplay of blockchain and channel structure with consideration of cyber-security in a platform supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    13. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    14. Zhou, Xiaoyang & Liu, He & Li, Jialu & Zhang, Kai & Lev, Benjamin, 2023. "Channel strategies when digital platforms emerge: A systematic literature review," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    15. Lin, Xiaogang & Chen, Ying-Ju & Xiong, Hui, 2024. "Manufacturers’ efforts and platform’s demand information sharing in eco-friendly actions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    16. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Xue Wang & Deqing Ma & Jinsong Hu, 2022. "Recycling Model Selection for Electronic Products Considering Platform Power and Blockchain Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-44, May.
    18. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & West, Douglas C., 2021. "Supply chain transparency: A bibliometric review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    19. Miao, Zhaowei & Peng, Hengming & Lan, Yongquan, 2025. "The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Zheng, Zhijun & Li, Gang & Cheng, T.C.E & Wu, Feng, 2022. "Offline supplementary service strategies for the online marketplace: Third-party service or marketplace service?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:348:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-022-05147-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.