IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v346y2025i2d10.1007_s10479-023-05750-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multiobjective coalition formation in facility and fleet sharing for resilient horizontal supply chain collaboration

Author

Listed:
  • Mirna Abou Mjahed

    (Supply Chain Management & Decision Support -Neoma Business School)

  • Fouad Ben Abdelaziz

    (Supply Chain Management & Decision Support -Neoma Business School)

  • Hussein Tarhini

    (Industrial Engineering and Management- American University of Beirut)

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on studying the collaborative facility and fleet sharing among firms operating at the same horizontal layer of a supply network and investigate the benefits derived from forming coalitions. Our research considers a two-echelon network setting where a group of suppliers operates multiple distribution centers and serves common retailers. The primary objective of the firms is to reduce costs through horizontal collaboration by sharing capacity and fleet resources. This collaboration not only leads to cost savings but also contributes to reducing the carbon footprint, promoting more sustainable operations. However, it is important to acknowledge that some firms highly value their internal delivery fleet and aim to maintain a certain level of service by utilizing their own resources whenever possible. To address this, we model the problem as a multiobjective cooperative game, aiming to find acceptable trade-off solutions that satisfy the preferences of the different suppliers. Our proposed research aims to assist the decision makers in answering three critical questions: (1) What is the value or worth of forming a coalition? (2) Which players should collaborate with each other? (3) How should costs be allocated among the players within a coalition? To address these questions, we integrate a comprehensive framework that generates optimal coalition structures and compare different cost allocation schemes: proportional allocation, Shapley value, the core and the nucleolus. These schemes provide decision makers with different approaches to distributing costs among coalition members. To further validate the effectiveness of our approach, we present a real application inspired by the beverage industry in Lebanon. The results of our analysis demonstrate significant opportunities for cost savings as evidenced by the 28% reduction in cost. Additionally, these findings suggest the potential for more sustainable operations, with the possibility of utilizing 40% fewer vehicles. Our research contributes to enhancing the collaboration process in terms of cost reduction and resource optimization. This collaboration can as well strengthens supply chain resilience and plays a role in fostering sustainability in transportation.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirna Abou Mjahed & Fouad Ben Abdelaziz & Hussein Tarhini, 2025. "A multiobjective coalition formation in facility and fleet sharing for resilient horizontal supply chain collaboration," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 1471-1496, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:346:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05750-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05750-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05750-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05750-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Audy, Jean-François & D’Amours, Sophie & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2012. "An empirical study on coalition formation and cost/savings allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 13-27.
    2. Shenle Pan & Damien Trentesaux & Eric Ballot & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Horizontal collaborative transport: survey of solutions and practical implementation issues," Post-Print hal-02008934, HAL.
    3. AUMANN, Robert J. & DREZE, Jacques H., 1974. "Cooperative games with coalition structures," LIDAM Reprints CORE 217, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    4. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael, 2015. "Operations research models for coalition structure in collaborative logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 147-159.
    5. SCHMEIDLER, David, 1969. "The nucleolus of a characteristic function game," LIDAM Reprints CORE 44, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    6. Frans Cruijssen & Wout Dullaert & Hein Fleuren, 2007. "Horizontal Cooperation in Transport and Logistics: A Literature Review," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 22-39, June.
    7. Mourad Makaci & Paul Reaidy & Karine Evrard-Samuel & Valérie Botta-Genoulaz & Thibaud Monteiro, 2017. "Pooled warehouse management: An empirical study," Post-Print hal-04343982, HAL.
    8. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    9. F. R. Fernández & M. A. Hinojosa & J. Puerto, 2002. "Core Solutions in Vector-Valued Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 331-360, February.
    10. Nagarajan, Mahesh & Sosic, Greys, 2008. "Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 719-745, June.
    11. Shenle Pan & Damien Trentesaux & Eric Ballot & George Q. Huang, 2019. "Horizontal collaborative transport: survey of solutions and practical implementation issues," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(15-16), pages 5340-5361, August.
    12. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Flisberg, Patrik & Frisk, Mikael, 2018. "Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 238-249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kidd, Martin P. & Borm, Peter, 2021. "On Determining Leading Coalitions in Supply Chains: Methodology and Application," Discussion Paper 2021-009, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Basso, Franco & Guajardo, Mario & Varas, Mauricio, 2020. "Collaborative job scheduling in the wine bottling process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    4. Thomas Hacardiaux & Christof Defryn & Jean-Sébastien Tancrez & Lotte Verdonck, 2022. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(1), pages 121-153, March.
    5. Guajardo, Mario & Rönnqvist, Mikael & Flisberg, Patrik & Frisk, Mikael, 2018. "Collaborative transportation with overlapping coalitions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(1), pages 238-249.
    6. Alikhani, Reza & Eskandarpour, Majid & Jahani, Hamed, 2023. "Collaborative distribution network design with surging demand and facility disruptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Kimms, A. & Kozeletskyi, I., 2016. "Core-based cost allocation in the cooperative traveling salesman problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 910-916.
    8. Rahmoune, Mahdi & Radjef, Mohammed Said & Boukherroub, Tasseda & Carvalho, Margarida, 2024. "A new integrated cooperative game and optimization model for the allocation of forest resources," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 316(1), pages 329-340.
    9. Hacardiaux, Thomas & Defryn, Christof & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Verdonck, Lotte, 2020. "Balancing partner preferences for logistics costs and carbon footprint in a horizontal cooperation," Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    10. Arroyo, Federico, 2024. "Cost Allocation in Vehicle Routing Problems with Time Windows," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(1), pages 1241-1268.
    11. Nassim Mrabti & Nadia Hamani & Laurent Delahoche, 2022. "A Comprehensive Literature Review on Sustainable Horizontal Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-38, September.
    12. Shitao Yang & Jiangao Zhang & Shaorui Zhou, 2024. "The cost transportation game for collaboration among transportation companies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1479-1503, May.
    13. Liu, Jia-Cai & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Li, Deng-Feng & Dai, Yong-Wu, 2021. "Collaborative profit allocation schemes for logistics enterprise coalitions with incomplete information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    14. Zhang, Ranran & Ma, Weimin & Si, Hongyun & Liu, Jinjin & Liao, Le, 2021. "Cooperative game analysis of coordination mechanisms under fairness concerns of a green retailer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    15. Brilka, Tim & Clausen, Uwe, 2021. "An approach to analyzing shippers' transportation management organization," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 259-288, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    16. Mauricio Varas & Franco Basso & Paul Bosch & Juan Pablo Contreras & Raúl Pezoa, 2022. "A horizontal collaborative approach for planning the wine grape harvesting," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 4965-4998, November.
    17. Luo, Chunlin & Zhou, Xiaoyang & Lev, Benjamin, 2022. "Core, shapley value, nucleolus and nash bargaining solution: A Survey of recent developments and applications in operations management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Serkan Alacam & Asli Sencer, 2021. "Using Blockchain Technology to Foster Collaboration among Shippers and Carriers in the Trucking Industry: A Design Science Research Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Mehmet Onur Olgun, 2022. "Collaborative airline revenue sharing game with grey demand data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(3), pages 861-882, September.
    20. Ben Jouida, Sihem & Krichen, Saoussen & Klibi, Walid, 2017. "Coalition-formation problem for sourcing contract design in supply networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 539-558.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:346:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05750-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.