IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v336y2024i3d10.1007_s10479-023-05425-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A generalization of the increasing generalized failure rate unimodality condition

Author

Listed:
  • Stefanos Leonardos

    (King’s College London)

  • Constandina Koki

    (University of Warwick)

  • Costis Melolidakis

    (National and Kapodistrian University of Athens)

Abstract

In this paper, we study unimodality conditions for distributions that describe markets with stochastic demand. Such conditions naturally emerge in the analysis of game-theoretic models of market competition (Cournot games) and supply chain coordination (Stackelberg games). We express the price elasticity of expected demand in terms of the mean residual life (MRL) function of the demand distribution and characterize optimal prices or equivalently, points of unitary elasticity, as fixed points of the MRL function. This leads to economic interpretable conditions on the demand distribution under which such fixed points exist and are unique. We find that markets with increasing price elasticity of expected demand that eventually become elastic correspond to distributions with decreasing generalized mean residual life (DGMRL) and finite second moment. DGMRL distributions strictly generalize the widely used increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR) distributions. We further elaborate on the relationship of the two classes, link their limiting behavior at infinity and examine moment and closure properties of DGMRL distributions that are important in economic applications. The DGMRL unimodality condition is useful in the analysis of optimal decisions under uncertainty in settings that are not covered by the widely-used IGFR condition; thus, it can be of broader interest to the game-theory and operations research literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefanos Leonardos & Constandina Koki & Costis Melolidakis, 2024. "A generalization of the increasing generalized failure rate unimodality condition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(3), pages 1661-1679, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:336:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05425-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05425-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05425-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-023-05425-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mandal, Prasenjit & Kaul, Rupali & Jain, Tarun, 2018. "Stocking and pricing decisions under endogenous demand and reference point effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 181-199.
    2. Meng Li & Nicholas C. Petruzzi, 2017. "Technical Note—Demand Uncertainty Reduction in Decentralized Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 156-161, January.
    3. Stefanos Leonardos & Costis Melolidakis, 2020. "Endogenizing the Cost Parameter in Cournot Oligopoly," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(02), pages 1-41, June.
    4. Fernando Bernstein & Awi Federgruen, 2005. "Decentralized Supply Chains with Competing Retailers Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 18-29, January.
    5. Harris, Milton & Raviv, Artur, 1981. "A Theory of Monopoly Pricing Schemes with Demand Uncertainty," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 71(3), pages 347-365, June.
    6. Maxime C. Cohen & Georgia Perakis & Robert S. Pindyck, 2015. "Pricing with Limited Knowledge of Demand," NBER Working Papers 21679, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Maqbool Dada, 1999. "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 183-194, April.
    8. Singh, S K & Maddala, G S, 1976. "A Function for Size Distribution of Incomes," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 44(5), pages 963-970, September.
    9. De Wolf, D. & Smeers, Y., 1997. "A stochastic version of a Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot equilibrium model," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1257, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    10. Kalyan Raman & Rabikar Chatterjee, 1995. "Optimal Monopolist Pricing Under Demand Uncertainty in Dynamic Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 144-162, January.
    11. Martin A. Lariviere, 2006. "A Note on Probability Distributions with Increasing Generalized Failure Rates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 602-604, June.
    12. Corchón, Luis C. & Torregrosa, Ramón J., 2020. "Cournot equilibrium revisited," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-10.
    13. Dana, James D, Jr, 2001. "Monopoly Price Dispersion under Demand Uncertainty," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 42(3), pages 649-670, August.
    14. Mark Bagnoli & Ted Bergstrom, 2006. "Log-concave probability and its applications," Studies in Economic Theory, in: Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Rosa L. Matzkin & Daniel L. McFadden & James C. Moore & Nicholas C. Yann (ed.), Rationality and Equilibrium, pages 217-241, Springer.
    15. Anand Paul, 2005. "A Note on Closure Properties of Failure Rate Distributions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 733-734, August.
    16. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2012. "A note on pricing with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 252-254.
    17. Jorge Navarro & Pedro Hernandez, 2008. "Mean residual life functions of finite mixtures, order statistics and coherent systems," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 67(3), pages 277-298, April.
    18. David Bradley & Ramesh Gupta, 2003. "Limiting behaviour of the mean residual life," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 55(1), pages 217-226, March.
    19. Xu, Minghui & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Xu, Xiaolin, 2010. "The effect of demand uncertainty in a price-setting newsvendor model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 946-957, December.
    20. van den Berg, Gerard J., 2007. "On the uniqueness of optimal prices set by monopolistic sellers," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 482-491, December.
    21. Edwin S. Mills, 1959. "Uncertainty and Price Theory," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 73(1), pages 116-130.
    22. Serhan Ziya & Hayriye Ayhan & Robert D. Foley, 2004. "Relationships Among Three Assumptions in Revenue Management," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 804-809, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefanos Leonardos & Costis Melolidakis & Constandina Koki, 2022. "Monopoly pricing in vertical markets with demand uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1291-1318, August.
    2. Paulo Oliveira & Nuria Torrado, 2015. "On proportional reversed failure rate class," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 999-1013, November.
    3. Colombo, Luca & Labrecciosa, Paola, 2012. "A note on pricing with risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 252-254.
    4. Lee, Eunji & Minner, Stefan, 2024. "How power structure and markup schemes impact supply chain channel efficiency under price-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 297-309.
    5. Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu & Ioana Popescu, 2011. "An Elasticity Approach to the Newsvendor with Price-Sensitive Demand," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(2), pages 301-312, April.
    6. Mihai Banciu & Prakash Mirchandani, 2013. "Technical Note—New Results Concerning Probability Distributions with Increasing Generalized Failure Rates," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 925-931, August.
    7. Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora, 2015. "A quantitative version of Myerson regularity," Working Paper Series in Economics 76, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    8. Serel, Doğan A., 2017. "A single-period stocking and pricing problem involving stochastic emergency supply," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 180-195.
    9. Schweizer, Nikolaus & Szech, Nora, 2015. "The quantitative view of Myerson regularity," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2015-307, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    10. Daniel Granot & Shuya Yin, 2005. "On the effectiveness of returns policies in the price‐dependent newsvendor model," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(8), pages 765-779, December.
    11. Niu, Baozhuang & Zhang, Jie, 2013. "Price, capacity and concession period decisions of Pareto-efficient BOT contracts with demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Xu, Minghui & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Xu, Xiaolin, 2010. "The effect of demand uncertainty in a price-setting newsvendor model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 946-957, December.
    13. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2007. "The Price of Anarchy in Supply Chains: Quantifying the Efficiency of Price-Only Contracts," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(8), pages 1249-1268, August.
    14. Yuyue Song & Saibal Ray & Shanling Li, 2008. "Structural Properties of Buyback Contracts for Price-Setting Newsvendors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Ru, Jun & Wang, Yunzeng, 2010. "Consignment contracting: Who should control inventory in the supply chain?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 760-769, March.
    16. Chen, Jing, 2011. "Returns with wholesale-price-discount contract in a newsvendor problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 104-111, March.
    17. Woonghee Tim Huh & Kun Soo Park, 2013. "Impact of transfer pricing methods for tax purposes on supply chain performance under demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(4), pages 269-293, June.
    18. Rubio-Herrero, Javier & Baykal-Gürsoy, Melike, 2020. "Mean-variance analysis of the newsvendor problem with price-dependent, isoelastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 942-953.
    19. Xiang Fang & Jun Ru & Yunzeng Wang, 2021. "The Effect of List Price on Channel Performance with Consignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 235-252, January.
    20. Boutselis, Petros & McNaught, Ken, 2014. "Finite-Time Horizon Logistics Decision Making Problems: Consideration of a Wider Set of Factors," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Innovative Methods in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Current Issues and Emerging Practices. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferenc, volume 19, pages 249-274, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:336:y:2024:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-023-05425-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.