IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v319y2022i2d10.1007_s10479-021-04424-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-objective supplier selection process: a simulation–optimization framework integrated with MCDM

Author

Listed:
  • Nihan Kabadayi

    (Istanbul University)

  • Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi

    (Northeastern University)

Abstract

As a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem, supplier selection plays a key role in achieving the objectives of a supply chain system. Multiple strategic, operational, quantitative, and qualitative criteria influence the supplier selection process. A wide spectrum of criteria have been introduced, classified, and used by researchers and practitioners to evaluate the suppliers’ performance; however, measuring and employing all of these criteria is impractical in real-world scenarios due to the budget, time, and information limitations. In this study, a decision support system (DSS) is developed, which helps managers to select a set of most effective criteria for the supplier selection process. This DSS is a threefold integration of MCDM and simulation and optimization. In this framework, the MCDM module incorporates a combination of criteria to select the suppliers. Then, a simulation model is used to evaluate the performance of the supply chain system considering the selected suppliers. Based on the simulation results, a multi-objective metaheuristic algorithm is utilized to find the ideal combinations of the criteria to maximize the supply chain system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Nihan Kabadayi & Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi, 2022. "Multi-objective supplier selection process: a simulation–optimization framework integrated with MCDM," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1607-1629, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:319:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04424-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04424-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04424-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04424-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ghodsypour, S. H. & O'Brien, C., 1998. "A decision support system for supplier selection using an integrated analytic hierarchy process and linear programming," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 199-212, September.
    2. Hamed Jalali & Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse, 2015. "Simulation optimization in inventory replenishment: a classification," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1217-1235, November.
    3. Negahban, Ashkan & Dehghanimohammadabadi, Mohammad, 2018. "Optimizing the supply chain configuration and production-sales policies for new products over multiple planning horizons," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 150-162.
    4. Mohammad Ziaei & Seyed Mojtaba Sajadi & Mohammad Mehdi Tavakoli, 2016. "The performance improvement of water pump manufacturing system via multi-criteria decision-making and simulation (a case study: Iran Godakht Company)," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 1-15.
    5. Mohammaditabar, Davood & Ghodsypour, Seyed Hassan & Hafezalkotob, Ashkan, 2016. "A game theoretic analysis in capacity-constrained supplier-selection and cooperation by considering the total supply chain inventory costs," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(PA), pages 87-97.
    6. Stephen C. Graves & Sean P. Willems, 2005. "Optimizing the Supply Chain Configuration for New Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1165-1180, August.
    7. Tsai, Shing Chih & Zheng, Ya-Xin, 2013. "A simulation optimization approach for a two-echelon inventory system with service level constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 364-374.
    8. J P C Kleijnen & M T Smits, 2003. "Performance metrics in supply chain management," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(5), pages 507-514, May.
    9. Kleijnen, J.P.C. & Smits, M.T., 2003. "Performance metrics in supply chain management," Other publications TiSEM 80777aed-0c9f-4ded-b0bb-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Amini, Mehdi & Li, Haitao, 2011. "Supply chain configuration for diffusion of new products: An integrated optimization approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 313-322, June.
    11. Ho, William & Xu, Xiaowei & Dey, Prasanta K., 2010. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 16-24, April.
    12. Kadziński, Miłosz & Tervonen, Tommi & Tomczyk, Michał K. & Dekker, Rommert, 2017. "Evaluation of multi-objective optimization approaches for solving green supply chain design problems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 168-184.
    13. Mojtaba Bozorgmehr & Leila Tavakoli, 2015. "An EFQM-based supplier evaluation and verification methodology based on product's manufacturing policy and technology intensity: industrial gas turbine industry as a case study," International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 276-306.
    14. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timperio, Giuseppe & Kundu, Tanmoy & Klumpp, Matthias & de Souza, Robert & Loh, Xiu Hui & Goh, Kelvin, 2022. "Beneficiary-centric decision support framework for enhanced resource coordination in humanitarian logistics: A case study from ASEAN," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ventura, José A. & Bunn, Kevin A. & Venegas, Bárbara B. & Duan, Lisha, 2021. "A coordination mechanism for supplier selection and order quantity allocation with price-sensitive demand and finite production rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Ting-Kwei Wang & Qian Zhang & Heap-Yih Chong & Xiangyu Wang, 2017. "Integrated Supplier Selection Framework in a Resilient Construction Supply Chain: An Approach via Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.
    3. Mohammed, Ahmed & Harris, Irina & Govindan, Kannan, 2019. "A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 171-184.
    4. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash, 2016. "A Bayesian network model for resilience-based supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 68-87.
    5. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    6. H A Akkermans & K E van Oorschot, 2005. "Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(8), pages 931-941, August.
    7. Robert Engel & Worarat Krathu & Marco Zapletal & Christian Pichler & R. P. Jagadeesh Chandra Bose & Wil Aalst & Hannes Werthner & Christian Huemer, 2016. "Analyzing inter-organizational business processes," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 577-612, August.
    8. Imane Tronnebati & Manal El Yadari & Fouad Jawab, 2022. "A Review of Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection Issues Using MCDM, MP and AI Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    9. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    10. Hatem Elleuch & Wafik Hachicha & Habib Chabchoub, 2014. "A combined approach for supply chain risk management: description and application to a real hospital pharmaceutical case study," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 641-663, May.
    11. Zhang, Xiunian & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2018. "Shipping mode choice in cold chain from a value-based management perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 147-167.
    12. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    13. Thalles Vitelli Garcez & Helder Tenório Cavalcanti & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2021. "A hybrid decision support model using Grey Relational Analysis and the Additive-Veto Model for solving multicriteria decision-making problems: an approach to supplier selection," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 304(1), pages 199-231, September.
    14. Alexandru Constăngioară, 2013. "Performance Metrics in Supply Chain Management. Evidence from Romanian Economy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 15(33), pages 170-179, February.
    15. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    16. Imre Dobos & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty, 2021. "Supplier selection: comparison of DEA models with additive and reciprocal data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 447-462, June.
    17. Hu, Kuo-Jen & Yu, Vincent F., 2016. "An integrated approach for the electronic contract manufacturer selection problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 68-81.
    18. Li, Haitao & Womer, Keith, 2012. "Optimizing the supply chain configuration for make-to-order manufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 118-128.
    19. Negahban, Ashkan & Dehghanimohammadabadi, Mohammad, 2018. "Optimizing the supply chain configuration and production-sales policies for new products over multiple planning horizons," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 150-162.
    20. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:319:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04424-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.