IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uiiexx/v47y2015i11p1217-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation optimization in inventory replenishment: a classification

Author

Listed:
  • Hamed Jalali
  • Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse

Abstract

Simulation optimization is increasingly popular for solving complicated and mathematically intractable business problems. Focusing on academic articles published between 1998 and 2013, the present survey aims to unveil the extent to which simulation optimization has been used to solve practical inventory problems (as opposed to small, theoretical “toy problem”), and to detect any trends that might have arisen (e.g., popular topics, effective simulation optimization methods, frequently studied inventory system structures). We find that metaheuristics (especially genetic algorithms) and methods that combine several simulation optimization techniques are the most popular. The resulting categorizations provide a useful overview for researchers studying complex inventory management problems, by providing detailed information on the inventory system characteristics and the employed simulation optimization techniques, highlighting articles that involve stochastic constraints (e.g., expected fill rate constraints) or that employ a robust simulation optimization approach. Finally, in highlighting both trends and gaps in the research field, this review suggests avenues for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamed Jalali & Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse, 2015. "Simulation optimization in inventory replenishment: a classification," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1217-1235, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:47:y:2015:i:11:p:1217-1235
    DOI: 10.1080/0740817X.2015.1019162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1019162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0740817X.2015.1019162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noordhoek, Marije & Dullaert, Wout & Lai, David S.W. & de Leeuw, Sander, 2018. "A simulation–optimization approach for a service-constrained multi-echelon distribution network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 292-311.
    2. Pourya Pourhejazy & Oh Kyoung Kwon, 2016. "The New Generation of Operations Research Methods in Supply Chain Optimization: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-23, October.
    3. Leonid Mylnikov & Rustam Fayzrakhmanov, 2018. "Production Planning with Parameters on the Basis of Dynamic Predictive Models: Interconnection and the Inertness of their Interaction," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 265-281.
    4. Bo Dai & Fenfen Li, 2021. "Joint Inventory Replenishment Planning of an E-Commerce Distribution System with Distribution Centers at Producers’ Locations," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Avci, Mualla Gonca & Selim, Hasan, 2018. "A multi-objective simulation-based optimization approach for inventory replenishment problem with premium freights in convergent supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 153-165.
    6. Kleijnen, Jack P.C., 2017. "Regression and Kriging metamodels with their experimental designs in simulation: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 1-16.
    7. Jalali, Hamed & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Picheny, Victor, 2017. "Comparison of Kriging-based algorithms for simulation optimization with heterogeneous noise," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 279-301.
    8. Mohammed Hichame Benbitour & Evren Sahin & Yves Dallery, 2019. "The use of rush deliveries in periodic review assemble-to-order systems," Post-Print hal-01997380, HAL.
    9. Romero-Silva, Rodrigo & de Leeuw, Sander, 2021. "Learning from the past to shape the future: A comprehensive text mining analysis of OR/MS reviews," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Dai, Bo & Chen, Haoxun & Li, Yuan & Zhang, Yidong & Wang, Xiaoqing & Deng, Yuming, 2023. "An alternating direction method of multipliers for optimizing (s, S) policies in a distribution system with joint replenishment volume constraints," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    11. Renato Matta & Timothy J. Lowe, 2023. "Product price alignment with seller service rating and consumer satisfaction," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 695-725, January.
    12. Othmane Benmoussa, 2022. "Improving Replenishment Flows Using Simulation Results: A Case Study," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-26, May.
    13. Yanyan Yang & Shenle Pan & Eric Ballot, 2017. "Mitigating supply chain disruptions through interconnected logistics services in the Physical Internet," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 3970-3983, July.
    14. Javad Seif & Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi & Andrew Junfang Yu, 2020. "Integrated preventive maintenance and flow shop scheduling under uncertainty," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 852-887, December.
    15. Shishvan, Masoud Soleymani & Benndorf, Jörg, 2019. "Simulation-based optimization approach for material dispatching in continuous mining systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1108-1125.
    16. Nihan Kabadayi & Mohammad Dehghanimohammadabadi, 2022. "Multi-objective supplier selection process: a simulation–optimization framework integrated with MCDM," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(2), pages 1607-1629, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uiiexx:v:47:y:2015:i:11:p:1217-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uiie .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.