IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v312y2022i2d10.1007_s10479-021-04426-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robust minimum cost flow problem under consistent flow constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Christina Büsing

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Arie M. C. A. Koster

    (RWTH Aachen University)

  • Sabrina Schmitz

    (RWTH Aachen University)

Abstract

The robust minimum cost flow problem under consistent flow constraints (RobMCF $$\equiv $$ ≡ ) is a new extension of the minimum cost flow (MCF) problem. In the RobMCF $$\equiv $$ ≡ problem, we consider demand and supply that are subject to uncertainty. For all demand realizations, however, we require that the flow value on an arc needs to be equal if it is included in the predetermined arc set given. The objective is to find feasible flows that satisfy the equal flow requirements while minimizing the maximum occurring cost among all demand realizations. In the case of a finite discrete set of scenarios, we derive structural results which point out the differences with the polynomial time solvable MCF problem in networks with integral demands, supplies, and capacities. In particular, the Integral Flow Theorem of Dantzig and Fulkerson does not hold. For this reason, we require integral flows in the entire paper. We show that the RobMCF $$\equiv $$ ≡ problem is strongly $$\mathcal {NP}$$ NP -hard on acyclic digraphs by a reduction from the (3, B2)-Sat problem. Further, we demonstrate that the RobMCF $$\equiv $$ ≡ problem is weakly $$\mathcal {NP}$$ NP -hard on series-parallel digraphs by providing a reduction from Partition. If in addition the number of scenarios is constant, we propose a pseudo-polynomial algorithm based on dynamic programming. Finally, we present a special case on series-parallel digraphs for which we can solve the RobMCF $$\equiv $$ ≡ problem in polynomial time.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina Büsing & Arie M. C. A. Koster & Sabrina Schmitz, 2022. "Robust minimum cost flow problem under consistent flow constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 691-722, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:312:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04426-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04426-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-021-04426-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-021-04426-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David R. Morrison & Jason J. Sauppe & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2013. "A Network Simplex Algorithm for the Equal Flow Problem on a Generalized Network," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 2-12, February.
    2. Ulrich Pferschy & Joachim Schauer, 2013. "The maximum flow problem with disjunctive constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 109-119, July.
    3. Dimitris Bertsimas & Melvyn Sim, 2004. "The Price of Robustness," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 35-53, February.
    4. Sara Mattia, 2013. "The robust network loading problem with dynamic routing," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 619-643, April.
    5. Antonio Manca & Giovanni Sechi & Paola Zuddas, 2010. "Water Supply Network Optimisation Using Equal Flow Algorithms," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(13), pages 3665-3678, October.
    6. Ali, Agha Iqbal & Kennington, Jeff & Shetty, Bala, 1988. "The equal flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 107-115, July.
    7. Calvete, Herminia I., 2003. "Network simplex algorithm for the general equal flow problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(3), pages 585-600, November.
    8. H. W. Lenstra, 1983. "Integer Programming with a Fixed Number of Variables," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(4), pages 538-548, November.
    9. Carraresi, P. & Gallo, G., 1984. "Network models for vehicle and crew scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 139-151, May.
    10. Alper Atamtürk & Muhong Zhang, 2007. "Two-Stage Robust Network Flow and Design Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 662-673, August.
    11. Ayşegül Altın & Hande Yaman & Mustafa Ç. Pınar, 2011. "The Robust Network Loading Problem Under Hose Demand Uncertainty: Formulation, Polyhedral Analysis, and Computations," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 75-89, February.
    12. Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin & Giovanni M. Sechi & Paola Zuddas, 1999. "Algorithms for the Simple Equal Flow Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(10), pages 1440-1455, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sara Mattia & Michael Poss, 2018. "A comparison of different routing schemes for the robust network loading problem: polyhedral results and computation," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 753-800, April.
    2. David R. Morrison & Jason J. Sauppe & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2013. "A Network Simplex Algorithm for the Equal Flow Problem on a Generalized Network," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 2-12, February.
    3. Hassan Hijazi & Pierre Bonami & Adam Ouorou, 2013. "Robust delay-constrained routing in telecommunications," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 206(1), pages 163-181, July.
    4. Siqian Shen & Mingdi You & Yintai Ma, 2017. "Single‐commodity stochastic network design under demand and topological uncertainties with insufficient data," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 154-173, March.
    5. Artur Alves Pessoa & Michael Poss, 2015. "Robust Network Design with Uncertain Outsourcing Cost," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 507-524, August.
    6. Dimitris Bertsimas & Ebrahim Nasrabadi & Sebastian Stiller, 2013. "Robust and Adaptive Network Flows," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(5), pages 1218-1242, October.
    7. Sun, Hao & Yang, Jun & Yang, Chao, 2019. "A robust optimization approach to multi-interval location-inventory and recharging planning for electric vehicles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 59-75.
    8. Antonio G. Martín & Manuel Díaz-Madroñero & Josefa Mula, 2020. "Master production schedule using robust optimization approaches in an automobile second-tier supplier," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 28(1), pages 143-166, March.
    9. Lebing Wang & Jian Gang Jin & Gleb Sibul & Yi Wei, 2023. "Designing Metro Network Expansion: Deterministic and Robust Optimization Models," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 317-347, March.
    10. Oğuz Solyalı & Jean-François Cordeau & Gilbert Laporte, 2016. "The Impact of Modeling on Robust Inventory Management Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1188-1201, April.
    11. Tao Yao & Supreet Mandala & Byung Chung, 2009. "Evacuation Transportation Planning Under Uncertainty: A Robust Optimization Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 171-189, June.
    12. Neyshabouri, Saba & Berg, Bjorn P., 2017. "Two-stage robust optimization approach to elective surgery and downstream capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 21-40.
    13. Haolin Ruan & Zhi Chen & Chin Pang Ho, 2023. "Adjustable Distributionally Robust Optimization with Infinitely Constrained Ambiguity Sets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1002-1023, September.
    14. Wang, Xin & Jiang, Ruiwei & Qi, Mingyao, 2023. "A robust optimization problem for drone-based equitable pandemic vaccine distribution with uncertain supply," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    15. Matthews, Logan R. & Gounaris, Chrysanthos E. & Kevrekidis, Ioannis G., 2019. "Designing networks with resiliency to edge failures using two-stage robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 704-720.
    16. Yang Wang & Yumeng Zhang & Mengyu Bi & Jianhui Lai & Yanyan Chen, 2022. "A Robust Optimization Method for Location Selection of Parcel Lockers under Uncertain Demands," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Virginie Gabrel & Cécile Murat & Lei Wu, 2013. "New models for the robust shortest path problem: complexity, resolution and generalization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 207(1), pages 97-120, August.
    18. Nicolas Kämmerling & Jannis Kurtz, 2020. "Oracle-based algorithms for binary two-stage robust optimization," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 539-569, November.
    19. Alan L. Erera & Juan C. Morales & Martin Savelsbergh, 2009. "Robust Optimization for Empty Repositioning Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 468-483, April.
    20. Dimitris Bertsimas & Frans J. C. T. de Ruiter, 2016. "Duality in Two-Stage Adaptive Linear Optimization: Faster Computation and Stronger Bounds," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 500-511, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:312:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s10479-021-04426-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.