IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v209y2013i1p139-15710.1007-s10479-011-0977-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal configuration of a decentralized, market-driven production/inventory system

Author

Listed:
  • Cigdem Gurgur

Abstract

Pull systems are inherently easier to implement on the shop-floor; however, they are quite difficult to plan and design for optimal operation, leaving little guidelines to system designers and practitioners. In this paper we use an effective and relatively fast numerical method to understand the optimal configuration of a multi-stage, multi-product, decentralized, market-driven production/inventory system that minimizes average inventory holding subject to a service level constraint through selection of various production and procurement control parameters. We have also conducted a number of numerical experiments to understand how the control policies respond to changes in the system parameters, such as the number of stages, system workload, demand arrival rates of products, and inventory holding costs. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Cigdem Gurgur, 2013. "Optimal configuration of a decentralized, market-driven production/inventory system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 139-157, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:139-157:10.1007/s10479-011-0977-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-011-0977-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-011-0977-1
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-011-0977-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Debasis Mitra & Isi Mitrani, 1991. "Analysis of a Kanban Discipline for Cell Coordination in Production Lines, II: Stochastic Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 807-823, October.
    2. George Liberopoulos & Yves Dallery, 2000. "A unified framework for pull control mechanisms in multi‐stage manufacturing systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 325-355, January.
    3. Cigdem Z. Gurgur & Tayfur Altiok, 2007. "Analysis of decentralized multi‐product pull systems with lost sales," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 357-370, June.
    4. Maria Di Mascolo & Yannick Frein & Yves Dallery, 1996. "An Analytical Method for Performance Evaluation of Kanban Controlled Production Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 50-64, February.
    5. Yu‐Sheng Zheng & Fangruo Chen, 1992. "Inventory policies with quantized ordering," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 285-305, April.
    6. Matthew J. Sobel, 1969. "Optimal Average-Cost Policy for a Queue with Start-Up and Shut-Down Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 145-162, February.
    7. Richard E. White & John N. Pearson & Jeffrey R. Wilson, 1999. "JIT Manufacturing: A Survey of Implementations in Small and Large U.S. Manufacturers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Debasis Mitra & Isi Mitrani, 1990. "Analysis of a Kanban Discipline for Cell Coordination in Production Lines. I," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(12), pages 1548-1566, December.
    9. Georg Krieg & Heinrich Kuhn, 2004. "Analysis of Multi-Product Kanban Systems with State-Dependent Setups and Lost Sales," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 141-166, January.
    10. Cigdem Gurgur & Tayfur Altiok, 2004. "Approximate Analysis of Decentralized, Multi-Stage, Pull-Type Production/Inventory Systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 95-116, January.
    11. Hervé Le Bihan & Yves Dallery, 2000. "A robust decomposition method for the analysis of production lines with unreliable machines and finite buffers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 265-297, January.
    12. Colin E. Bell, 1971. "Characterization and Computation of Optimal Policies for Operating an M / G /1 Queuing System with Removable Server," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 208-218, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thiago Cantos Lopes & Celso Gustavo Stall Sikora & Adalberto Sato Michels & Leandro Magatão, 2020. "Mixed-model assembly lines balancing with given buffers and product sequence: model, formulation comparisons, and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 286(1), pages 475-500, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cigdem Z. Gurgur & Tayfur Altiok, 2007. "Analysis of decentralized multi‐product pull systems with lost sales," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(4), pages 357-370, June.
    2. Kumar Satyam & Ananth Krishnamurthy, 2013. "Performance analysis of CONWIP systems with batch size constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 209(1), pages 85-114, October.
    3. Mark Vroblefski & R. Ramesh & Stanley Zionts, 2000. "General Open and Closed Queueing Networks with Blocking: A Unified Framework for Approximation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 299-316, November.
    4. Zhao Xiaobo & Qiguo Gong & Kenichi Nakashima, 2001. "Analysis of a production system in a general configuration," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 128-143, March.
    5. Iwase, Masaharu & Ohno, Katsuhisa, 2011. "The performance evaluation of a multi-stage JIT production system with stochastic demand and production capacities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 216-222, October.
    6. Tayfur Altiok & Goang An Shiue, 1995. "Single‐stage, multi‐product production/inventory systems with lost sales," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(6), pages 889-913, September.
    7. Kim, Ilhyung & Tang, Christopher S., 1997. "Lead time and response time in a pull production control system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(3), pages 474-485, September.
    8. Zipkin, Paul, 1995. "Processing networks with planned inventories: Tandem queues with feedback," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 344-349, January.
    9. Papadopoulos, H. T. & Heavey, C., 1996. "Queueing theory in manufacturing systems analysis and design: A classification of models for production and transfer lines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(1), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Jau-Chuan Ke, 2006. "An M/G/1 queue under hysteretic vacation policy with an early startup and un-reliable server," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 63(2), pages 357-369, May.
    11. Wei Li & Attahiru Sule Alfa, 2000. "Optimal policies for M/M/m queue with two different kinds of (N, T)‐policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 240-258, April.
    12. Houmin Yan & Xun Yu Zhou & G. Yin, 1999. "Approximating an Optimal Production Policy in a Continuous Flow Line: Recurrence and Asymptotic Properties," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 535-549, August.
    13. Tirdad, Ali & Grassmann, Winfried K. & Tavakoli, Javad, 2016. "Optimal policies of M(t)/M/c/c queues with two different levels of servers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 1124-1130.
    14. Park, Chan-Woo & Lee, Hyo-Seong, 2013. "Performance evaluation of a multi-product CONWIP assembly system with correlated external demands," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 334-344.
    15. Ou, Jihong & Jiang, Jiong, 1997. "Yield comparison of push and pull control methods on production systems with unreliable machines," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 1-12, May.
    16. Lotfi Tadj & Gautam Choudhury, 2005. "Optimal design and control of queues," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 13(2), pages 359-412, December.
    17. Jim (Junmin) Shi & Michael N. Katehakis & Benjamin Melamed & Yusen Xia, 2014. "Production-Inventory Systems with Lost Sales and Compound Poisson Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(5), pages 1048-1063, October.
    18. Mascolo, Maria Di, 1996. "Analysis of a synchronization station for the performance evaluation of a kanban system with a general arrival process of demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 147-163, February.
    19. Matta, Andrea & Dallery, Yves & Di Mascolo, Maria, 2005. "Analysis of assembly systems controlled with kanbans," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 166(2), pages 310-336, October.
    20. Albino, Vito & Dassisti, Michele & O. Okogbaa, Geoffrey, 1995. "Approximation approach for the performance analysis of production lines under a kanban discipline," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2-3), pages 197-207, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:209:y:2013:i:1:p:139-157:10.1007/s10479-011-0977-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.