IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/aistmt/v70y2018i4d10.1007_s10463-017-0613-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing equality between several populations covariance operators

Author

Listed:
  • Graciela Boente

    (Universidad de Buenos Aires and IMAS, CONICET)

  • Daniela Rodriguez

    (Universidad de Buenos Aires and IMAS, CONICET)

  • Mariela Sued

    (Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET)

Abstract

In many situations, when dealing with several populations, equality of the covariance operators is assumed. An important issue is to study whether this assumption holds before making other inferences. In this paper, we develop a test for comparing covariance operators of several functional data samples. The proposed test is based on the Hilbert–Schmidt norm of the difference between estimated covariance operators. In particular, when dealing with two populations, the test statistic is just the squared norm of the difference between the two covariance operators estimators. The asymptotic behaviour of the test statistic under both the null hypothesis and local alternatives is obtained. The computation of the quantiles of the null asymptotic distribution is not feasible in practice. To overcome this problem, a bootstrap procedure is considered. The performance of the test statistic for small sample sizes is illustrated through a Monte Carlo study and on a real data set.

Suggested Citation

  • Graciela Boente & Daniela Rodriguez & Mariela Sued, 2018. "Testing equality between several populations covariance operators," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 70(4), pages 919-950, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:70:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10463-017-0613-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10463-017-0613-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10463-017-0613-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10463-017-0613-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferraty, Frederic & Vieu, Philippe & Viguier-Pla, Sylvie, 2007. "Factor-based comparison of groups of curves," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(10), pages 4903-4910, June.
    2. Davide Pigoli & John A. D. Aston & Ian L. Dryden & Piercesare Secchi, 2014. "Distances and inference for covariance operators," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 101(2), pages 409-422.
    3. Stefan Fremdt & Josef G. Steinebach & Lajos Horváth & Piotr Kokoszka, 2013. "Testing the Equality of Covariance Operators in Functional Samples," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 40(1), pages 138-152, March.
    4. Neuhaus, Georg, 1980. "A note on computing the distribution of the norm of Hilbert space valued Gaussian random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 19-25, March.
    5. Ferraty, Frederic & Van Keilegom, Ingrid & Vieu, Philippe, 2010. "On the Validity of the Bootstrap in Non-Parametric Functional Regression," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2010018, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. E. Paparoditis & T. Sapatinas, 2016. "Bootstrap-based testing of equality of mean functions or equality of covariance operators for functional data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 103(3), pages 727-733.
    7. Chang, Chung & Todd Ogden, R., 2009. "Bootstrapping sums of independent but not identically distributed continuous processes with applications to functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(6), pages 1291-1303, July.
    8. Arjun Gupta & Jin Xu, 2006. "On Some Tests of the Covariance Matrix Under General Conditions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 58(1), pages 101-114, March.
    9. Frédéric Ferraty & Ingrid Van Keilegom & Philippe Vieu, 2010. "On the Validity of the Bootstrap in Non‐Parametric Functional Regression," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 286-306, June.
    10. Boente, Graciela & Rodriguez, Daniela & Sued, Mariela, 2010. "Inference under functional proportional and common principal component models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 464-475, February.
    11. Dauxois, J. & Pousse, A. & Romain, Y., 1982. "Asymptotic theory for the principal component analysis of a vector random function: Some applications to statistical inference," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 136-154, March.
    12. Ferraty, F. & Van Keilegom, I. & Vieu, P., 2012. "Regression when both response and predictor are functions," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 10-28.
    13. Ferraty, F. & Van Keilegom, Ingrid & Vieu, P., 2012. "Regression when both response and predictor are functions," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2012004, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    14. Boente, Graciela & Fraiman, Ricardo, 2000. "Kernel-based functional principal components," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 335-345, July.
    15. J. Cuesta-Albertos & M. Febrero-Bande, 2010. "A simple multiway ANOVA for functional data," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 19(3), pages 537-557, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ahmad, Rauf, 2022. "Tests for proportionality of matrices with large dimension," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Boente, Graciela & Rodriguez, Daniela & Sued, Mariela, 2019. "The spatial sign covariance operator: Asymptotic results and applications," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 115-128.
    3. Norbert Henze & María Dolores Jiménez‐Gamero, 2021. "A test for Gaussianity in Hilbert spaces via the empirical characteristic functional," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(2), pages 406-428, June.
    4. Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot, 2022. "Detecting relevant differences in the covariance operators of functional time series: a sup-norm approach," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 195-231, April.
    5. Balogoun, Armando Sosthène Kali & Nkiet, Guy Martial & Ogouyandjou, Carlos, 2021. "Asymptotic normality of a generalized maximum mean discrepancy estimator," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia Guo & Bu Zhou & Jianwei Chen & Jin-Ting Zhang, 2019. "An $${{\varvec{L}}}^{2}$$L2-norm-based test for equality of several covariance functions: a further study," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(4), pages 1092-1112, December.
    2. Kraus, David, 2019. "Inferential procedures for partially observed functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 583-603.
    3. Shuzhi Zhu & Peixin Zhao, 2019. "Tests for the linear hypothesis in semi-functional partial linear regression models," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(2), pages 125-148, March.
    4. Boente, Graciela & Rodriguez, Daniela & Sued, Mariela, 2019. "The spatial sign covariance operator: Asymptotic results and applications," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 115-128.
    5. Shang, Han Lin, 2013. "Bayesian bandwidth estimation for a nonparametric functional regression model with unknown error density," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 185-198.
    6. Yousri Slaoui, 2021. "Recursive non-parametric kernel classification rule estimation for independent functional data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 79-112, March.
    7. Heungsun Hwang & Hye Suk & Yoshio Takane & Jang-Han Lee & Jooseop Lim, 2015. "Generalized Functional Extended Redundancy Analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 80(1), pages 101-125, March.
    8. Pini, Alessia & Stamm, Aymeric & Vantini, Simone, 2018. "Hotelling’s T2 in separable Hilbert spaces," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 284-305.
    9. Park, Juhyun & Gasser, Theo & Rousson, Valentin, 2009. "Structural components in functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(9), pages 3452-3465, July.
    10. Martínez-Camblor, Pablo & Corral, Norberto, 2011. "Repeated measures analysis for functional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(12), pages 3244-3256, December.
    11. Dimitrios Pilavakis & Efstathios Paparoditis & Theofanis Sapatinas, 2020. "Testing equality of autocovariance operators for functional time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 571-589, July.
    12. Hlávka, Zdeněk & Hlubinka, Daniel & Koňasová, Kateřina, 2022. "Functional ANOVA based on empirical characteristic functionals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    13. Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot, 2022. "Detecting relevant differences in the covariance operators of functional time series: a sup-norm approach," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 74(2), pages 195-231, April.
    14. Ci-Ren Jiang & John A. D. Aston & Jane-Ling Wang, 2016. "A Functional Approach to Deconvolve Dynamic Neuroimaging Data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 111(513), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Ghiglietti, Andrea & Paganoni, Anna Maria, 2017. "Exact tests for the means of Gaussian stochastic processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 102-107.
    16. Holger Dette & Kevin Kokot & Stanislav Volgushev, 2020. "Testing relevant hypotheses in functional time series via self‐normalization," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 82(3), pages 629-660, July.
    17. Zhang, Jin-Ting & Cheng, Ming-Yen & Wu, Hau-Tieng & Zhou, Bu, 2019. "A new test for functional one-way ANOVA with applications to ischemic heart screening," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 3-17.
    18. Laurent Delsol, 2013. "No effect tests in regression on functional variable and some applications to spectrometric studies," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 1775-1811, August.
    19. Zhou, Zhiyang, 2021. "Fast implementation of partial least squares for function-on-function regression," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Andrada Ivanescu & Ana-Maria Staicu & Fabian Scheipl & Sonja Greven, 2015. "Penalized function-on-function regression," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 539-568, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:aistmt:v:70:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10463-017-0613-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.