IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spd/journl/v63y2013i3-4p26-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process

Author

Listed:
  • Ioannis Dagkinis

    (University of the Aegean, Dept. of Shipping Trade and Transport, 2a Korai Str., 821 00 Chios, Greece)

  • Nikitas Nikitakos

    (University of the Aegean, Dept. of Shipping Trade and Transport, 2a Korai Str., 821 00 Chios, Greece)

Abstract

The equipment maintenance strategy is one of the factors influencing the safety and overall operational management of the ship. Using the wrong maintenance strategies can waste time, money, and resources, and often has no effect on improving or maintaining availability of equipments. Thus the reliability of the ship is reduced, and the risks and the probability of failures increased. The aim of this paper is to show one approach to the risk evaluation from equipments maintenance strategy of the ship. The paper describes main characteristics of Maintenance Strategies where the impact on safety is crucial and a model for evaluation of its risk. The model is based on the application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process method. The developed model uses subjectivity, experience and knowledge, when determining significance of selected risk elements in relation to total safety and risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioannis Dagkinis & Nikitas Nikitakos, 2013. "Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process," SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business, University of Piraeus, vol. 63(3-4), pages 26-36, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spd:journl:v:63:y:2013:i:3-4:p:26-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spoudai.unipi.gr/index.php/spoudai/article/download/86/156/86-440-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Al-Najjar, Basim & Alsyouf, Imad, 2003. "Selecting the most efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 85-100, April.
    2. Yoram Wind & Thomas L. Saaty, 1980. "Marketing Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(7), pages 641-658, July.
    3. Wang, Ling & Chu, Jian & Wu, Jun, 2007. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 151-163, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Kirubakaran & M. Ilangkumaran, 2016. "Selection of optimum maintenance strategy based on FAHP integrated with GRA–TOPSIS," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 285-313, October.
    2. Dilbagh PANCHAL & Prasenjit CHATTERJEE & Rajendra Kumar SHUKLA & Tanupriya CHOUDHURY & Jolanta TAMOSAITIENE, 2017. "Integrated Fuzzy AHP-Codas Framework for Maintenance Decision in Urea Fertilizer Industry," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(3), pages 179-196.
    3. Mohsen Mostafa & Nishtman Hatami & Kambiz Espahbodi & Farhad Asadi, 2022. "Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) applied to evaluating the forest management approaches," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(7), pages 263-276.
    4. repec:jle:journl:132 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. María Carmen Carnero & Andrés Gómez, 2019. "Optimization of Decision Making in the Supply of Medicinal Gases Used in Health Care," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-31, May.
    6. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Fuzzy Multicriteria Models for Decision Making in Gamification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-23, May.
    7. Priyank Srivastava & Dinesh Khanduja & V. P. Agrawal, 2020. "Agile maintenance attribute coding and evaluation based decision making in sugar manufacturing plant," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 57(2), pages 553-583, June.
    8. Ruzhdi Jashari, 2017. "Protection of Personal Data Requirement of Modern Times for the Functioning of the Security, Individual Freedoms and the Rule of Law," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 2, May Augus.
    9. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kumar, Pradeep & Barua, Mukesh Kumar, 2015. "Risk analysis in green supply chain using fuzzy AHP approach: A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 375-390.
    10. Manuel Luna & Ignacio Llorente & Angel Cobo, 2022. "Determination of feeding strategies in aquaculture farms using a multiple-criteria approach and genetic algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 551-576, July.
    11. Alsyouf, Imad, 2009. "Maintenance practices in Swedish industries: Survey results," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 212-223, September.
    12. Raman Kumar Goyal & Sakshi Kaushal, 2018. "Deriving crisp and consistent priorities for fuzzy AHP-based multicriteria systems using non-linear constrained optimization," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 195-209, June.
    13. Riya Sureka & Satish Kumar & Deepraj Mukherjee & Christina Theodoraki, 2023. "What restricts SMEs from adopting sophisticated capital budgeting practices?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 265-290, January.
    14. Carnero, María Carmen & Gómez, Andrés, 2017. "Maintenance strategy selection in electric power distribution systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 255-272.
    15. Mahmood Shafiee & Ashraf Labib & Jhareswar Maiti & Andrew Starr, 2019. "Maintenance strategy selection for multi-component systems using a combined analytic network process and cost-risk criticality model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(2), pages 89-104, April.
    16. Ho, William & Ma, Xin, 2018. "The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 399-414.
    17. Syed Hammad Mian & Abdulrahman Al-Ahmari, 2019. "Comparative analysis of different digitization systems and selection of best alternative," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 2039-2067, June.
    18. Benyou Jia & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Pingan Zhong & Zhongbo Yu, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Best Compromise Decision Model for Real-Time Flood Mitigation Operations of Multi-Reservoir System," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(10), pages 3363-3387, August.
    19. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    20. Fatih Yiğit & Şakir Esnaf, 2021. "A new Fuzzy C-Means and AHP-based three-phased approach for multiple criteria ABC inventory classification," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 1517-1528, August.
    21. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Maintenance Strategy; Ship Safety; Multi Decision Criteria Making; AHP.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C67 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Input-Output Models
    • C83 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Survey Methods; Sampling Methods

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spd:journl:v:63:y:2013:i:3-4:p:26-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SPOUDAI Journal of Economics and Business (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/depirgr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.