IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sot/journl/y2007i35p27-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative transport network designs and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Woxenius, Johan

Abstract

Six principles for operation of the rail part of intermodal rail freight transport systems are described: direct link, corridor, hub-and-spoke, connected hubs, static routes, and dynamic routes. The first part is a theoretical discussion of the characteristics of the transport network designs. The theory is then applied to intermodal freight transport by analysing how each transport network design affects the need for terminal performance. The discussion includes a classification of existing transfer technologies and an analysis of how well developed technologies meet the demands. It is concluded that there is a sufficient supply of technologies, but some need to be taken further than the current blueprint phase and prove their viability in technical and economic terms.

Suggested Citation

  • Woxenius, Johan, 2007. "Alternative transport network designs and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 35, pages 27-45.
    • Handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2007:i:35:p:27-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5938
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tjokroamidjojo, Darsono & Kutanoglu, Erhan & Taylor, G. Don, 2006. "Quantifying the value of advance load information in truckload trucking," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 340-357, July.
    2. Fredrik Bärthel & Johan Woxenius, 2004. "Developing intermodal transport for small flows over short distances," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 403-424, October.
    3. Loizides, John & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2002. "Productivity growth in European railways: a new approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 633-644, August.
    4. Kreutzberger, Ekki, 2004. "The shipper’s perspective on distance and time and the operator (intermodal goods transport) response," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 25-26, pages 99-113.
    5. Danielis, Romeo & Marcucci, Edoardo, 2007. "Attribute cut-offs in freight service selection," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 506-515, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boschian, Valentina & Dotoli, Mariagrazia & Fanti, Maria Pia & Iacobellis, Giorgio & Ukovich, Walter, 2010. "A metamodelling approach for performance evaluation of intermodal transportation networks," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 46, pages 100-113.
    2. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    3. Woxenius, Johan, 2012. "Directness as a key performance indicator for freight transport chains," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 63-72.
    4. Kumar, Aalok & Anbanandam, Ramesh, 2020. "Evaluating the interrelationships among inhibitors to intermodal railroad freight transport in emerging economies: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 559-581.
    5. Ferrari, Paolo, 2018. "Some necessary conditions for the success of innovations in rail freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 747-758.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ralf Elbert & Lowis Seikowsky, 2017. "The influences of behavioral biases, barriers and facilitators on the willingness of forwarders’ decision makers to modal shift from unimodal road freight transport to intermodal road–rail freight tra," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(8), pages 1083-1123, November.
    2. Lu, Changxiang & Ye, Yong & Fang, Yongjun & Fang, Jiaqi, 2023. "An optimal control theory approach for freight structure path evolution post-COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    3. Viet, Nguyen Quoc & Behdani, Behzad & Bloemhof, Jacqueline, 2018. "Value of Information to Improve Daily Operations in High-Density Logistics," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 9(1), January.
    4. Jason Monios & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2014. "The Impact of Container Type Diversification on Regional British Port Development Strategies," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 583-606, September.
    5. Jorge Antunes & Goodness C. Aye & Rangan Gupta & Peter Wanke & Yong Tan, 2020. "Endogenous Long-Term Productivity Performance in Advanced Countries: A Novel Two-Dimensional Fuzzy-Monte Carlo Approach," Working Papers 2020111, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    6. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2018. "The importance of considering non-linear layover and delay costs for local truckers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 331-355.
    7. Larranaga, Ana Margarita & Arellana, Julian & Senna, Luiz Afonso, 2017. "Encouraging intermodality: A stated preference analysis of freight mode choice in Rio Grande do Sul," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 202-211.
    8. Morales-Fusco, Pau & Saurí, Sergi & Lago, Alejandro, 2012. "Potential freight distribution improvements using motorways of the sea," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-11.
    9. Gohari, Adel & Ahmad, Anuar Bin & Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard & Gohari, Ali & Hasan, Razi & Sholagberu, Abdulkadir Taofeeq, 2022. "Significance of intermodal freight modal choice criteria: MCDM-based decision support models and SP-based modal shift policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 46-60.
    10. Behrends, Sönke, 2017. "Burden or opportunity for modal shift? – Embracing the urban dimension of intermodal road-rail transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 10-16.
    11. Lucia Rotaris & Romeo Danielis & Igor Sarman & Edoardo Marcucci, 2012. "Testing for nonlinearity in the choice of a freight transport service," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 50, pages 1-4.
    12. Román, Concepción & Arencibia, Ana Isabel & Feo-Valero, María, 2017. "A latent class model with attribute cut-offs to analyze modal choice for freight transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 212-227.
    13. Reis, Vasco, 2014. "Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 100-120.
    14. Khakdaman, Masoud & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2022. "Shippers’ willingness to use flexible transportation services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 1-20.
    15. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    16. Damian Bonk & Sylwia Kowalska, 2020. "Modal Choice Preferences in Inland Container Transport in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 99-109.
    17. Evangelinos, Christos & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan & Marcucci, Edoardo & Gatta, Valerio, 2018. "Pricing workplace parking via cash-out: Effects on modal choice and implications for transport policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 369-380.
    18. Srour, F.J. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Oppen, J., 2014. "The Value of Inaccurate Advance Time Window Information in a Pick-up and Delivery Problem," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    19. Yang, Gaoju & Huang, Xianhai & Huang, Jiahui & Chen, Hangyu, 2020. "Assessment of the effects of infrastructure investment under the belt and road initiative," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    20. Kim, Nam Seok & Van Wee, Bert, 2011. "The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 859-875.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2007:i:35:p:27-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Danielis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/xxxxxxx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.