IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sot/journl/y2004i25-26p99-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The shipper’s perspective on distance and time and the operator (intermodal goods transport) response

Author

Listed:
  • Kreutzberger, Ekki

Abstract

This paper is about distance and time in alternative bundling networks and roundtrip models. First the relevance of transport costs and time for customers of intermodal transport is reviewed. Then the paper focuses on vehicle roundtrip design in European intermodal rail networks and the perspectives to accelerate roundtrip speed. Acceleration often implies an increase of service frequency. As transport volumes often will not justify higher frequencies, the introduction of so-called complex bundling (e.g. hub-and-spoke or line services) may be an outcome. Complex bundling allows applying a relative large vehicle scale, despite of restricted flow sizes. This cost advantage is likely to overrule the cost disadvantage of longer routes in complex bundling networks. An important indication for this fact is a comparison of total network distances and times. The last part of the paper compares the distances and times of about 150 networks (different bundling concepts and network geometries). It shows that the additional length of routes of complex bundling networks is always overruled by the distance and time impact of a lower number of connections between begin- and end terminals in complex bundling networks

Suggested Citation

  • Kreutzberger, Ekki, 2004. "The shipper’s perspective on distance and time and the operator (intermodal goods transport) response," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 25-26, pages 99-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2004:i:25-26:p:99-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5787
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michel Beuthe & Christophe Bouffioux & Jan De Maeyer, 2003. "A multicriteria analysis of stated preferences among freight transport alternatives," ERSA conference papers ersa03p173, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Woxenius, Johan, 2012. "Directness as a key performance indicator for freight transport chains," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 63-72.
    2. Woxenius, Johan, 2007. "Alternative transport network designs and their implications for intermodal transhipment technologies," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 35, pages 27-45.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kreutzberger, Ekki D., 2008. "Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe: A generic approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(7), pages 973-993, August.
    2. Zamparini, Luca & Layaa, John & Dullaert, Wout, 2011. "Monetary values of freight transport quality attributes: A sample of Tanzanian firms," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1222-1234.
    3. Li, Qinglin & Rezaei, Jafar & Tavasszy, Lori & Wiegmans, Bart & Guo, Jingwei & Tang, Yinying & Peng, Qiyuan, 2020. "Customers’ preferences for freight service attributes of China Railway Express," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 225-236.
    4. Caris, An & Limbourg, Sabine & Macharis, Cathy & van Lier, Tom & Cools, Mario, 2014. "Integration of inland waterway transport in the intermodal supply chain: a taxonomy of research challenges," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 126-136.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2004:i:25-26:p:99-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Danielis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/xxxxxxx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.