IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureri/50394.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Value of Inaccurate Advance Time Window Information in a Pick-up and Delivery Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Srour, F.J.
  • Agatz, N.A.H.
  • Oppen, J.

Abstract

We examine different routing strategies to cope with inaccurate time window in- formation in the context of a dynamic pick-up and delivery problem with time windows. Our experiments show that advance information, even if inaccurate, can provide benefits from a planning perspective. We propose a novel stochastic strategy that consistently performs well compared to several benchmark strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Srour, F.J. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Oppen, J., 2014. "The Value of Inaccurate Advance Time Window Information in a Pick-up and Delivery Problem," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-002-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:50394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/50394/ERS-2014-002-LIS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tjokroamidjojo, Darsono & Kutanoglu, Erhan & Taylor, G. Don, 2006. "Quantifying the value of advance load information in truckload trucking," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 340-357, July.
    2. Berbeglia, Gerardo & Cordeau, Jean-François & Laporte, Gilbert, 2010. "Dynamic pickup and delivery problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 8-15, April.
    3. Soumia Ichoua & Michel Gendreau & Jean-Yves Potvin, 2006. "Exploiting Knowledge About Future Demands for Real-Time Vehicle Dispatching," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(2), pages 211-225, May.
    4. Gianpaolo Ghiani & Emanuele Manni & Barrett W. Thomas, 2012. "A Comparison of Anticipatory Algorithms for the Dynamic and Stochastic Traveling Salesman Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 374-387, August.
    5. Barrett W. Thomas & Chelsea C. White, 2004. "Anticipatory Route Selection," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 473-487, November.
    6. Ghiani, Gianpaolo & Guerriero, Francesca & Laporte, Gilbert & Musmanno, Roberto, 2003. "Real-time vehicle routing: Solution concepts, algorithms and parallel computing strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 1-11, November.
    7. Mitrovic-Minic, Snezana & Krishnamurti, Ramesh & Laporte, Gilbert, 2004. "Double-horizon based heuristics for the dynamic pickup and delivery problem with time windows," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 669-685, September.
    8. Russell W. Bent & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2004. "Scenario-Based Planning for Partially Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 977-987, December.
    9. Jian Yang & Patrick Jaillet & Hani Mahmassani, 2004. "Real-Time Multivehicle Truckload Pickup and Delivery Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 135-148, May.
    10. M. W. P. Savelsbergh & M. Sol, 1995. "The General Pickup and Delivery Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 17-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srour, F.J. & Agatz, N.A.H. & Oppen, J., 2014. "Strategies for Handling Temporal Uncertainty in Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-015-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. F. Jordan Srour & Niels Agatz & Johan Oppen, 2018. "Strategies for Handling Temporal Uncertainty in Pickup and Delivery Problems with Time Windows," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 3-19, January.
    3. Zhang, Jian & Woensel, Tom Van, 2023. "Dynamic vehicle routing with random requests: A literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    4. Pillac, Victor & Gendreau, Michel & Guéret, Christelle & Medaglia, Andrés L., 2013. "A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 225(1), pages 1-11.
    5. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2018. "The importance of considering non-linear layover and delay costs for local truckers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 331-355.
    6. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    7. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2016. "Effective truckload dispatch decision methods with incomplete advance load information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 103-121.
    8. Miguel Andres Figliozzi & Hani S. Mahmassani & Patrick Jaillet, 2007. "Pricing in Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problems," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 302-318, August.
    9. Cheung, Bernard K.-S. & Choy, K.L. & Li, Chung-Lun & Shi, Wenzhong & Tang, Jian, 2008. "Dynamic routing model and solution methods for fleet management with mobile technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 694-705, June.
    10. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Haughton, Michael, 2014. "The benefit of advance load information for truckload carriers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 34-54.
    11. Ritzinger, Ulrike & Puchinger, Jakob & Rudloff, Christian & Hartl, Richard F., 2022. "Comparison of anticipatory algorithms for a dial-a-ride problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(2), pages 591-608.
    12. Stefan Vonolfen & Michael Affenzeller, 2016. "Distribution of waiting time for dynamic pickup and delivery problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 236(2), pages 359-382, January.
    13. Farzaneh Karami & Wim Vancroonenburg & Greet Vanden Berghe, 2020. "A periodic optimization approach to dynamic pickup and delivery problems with time windows," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 711-731, December.
    14. Bock, Stefan, 2010. "Real-time control of freight forwarder transportation networks by integrating multimodal transport chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 733-746, February.
    15. Barrett W. Thomas, 2007. "Waiting Strategies for Anticipating Service Requests from Known Customer Locations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 319-331, August.
    16. Nikola Mardešić & Tomislav Erdelić & Tonči Carić & Marko Đurasević, 2023. "Review of Stochastic Dynamic Vehicle Routing in the Evolving Urban Logistics Environment," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-44, December.
    17. Berbeglia, Gerardo & Cordeau, Jean-François & Laporte, Gilbert, 2010. "Dynamic pickup and delivery problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 8-15, April.
    18. Soeffker, Ninja & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Mattfeld, Dirk C., 2022. "Stochastic dynamic vehicle routing in the light of prescriptive analytics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(3), pages 801-820.
    19. Lars M. Hvattum & Arne Løkketangen & Gilbert Laporte, 2006. "Solving a Dynamic and Stochastic Vehicle Routing Problem with a Sample Scenario Hedging Heuristic," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(4), pages 421-438, November.
    20. Agatz, Niels & Erera, Alan & Savelsbergh, Martin & Wang, Xing, 2012. "Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 295-303.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    routing; value of information; dynamic pick-up and delivery problem with time windows; multiple scenario analysis;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureri:50394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erimanl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.