IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/smo/journl/v10y2025i2p253-281.html

Divergent Paths to Modern Governance: A Meta-Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Transformation Journey

Author

Listed:
  • Dereje B. Tessema

    (Georgetown University, USA)

  • Darrell Norman Burrell

    (Marymount University, Arlington, VA, USA)

  • Mohammed Hamad Al-Hajeri

    (Florida University Southeast, Boynton Beach, FL, USA)

  • Ayenachew Aseffa, Bereketeab Dereje

    (Florida University Southeast, Boynton Beach, FL, USA)

  • Bereketeab Dereje

    (Florida University Southeast, Boynton Beach, FL, USA)

Abstract

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's transformation under Vision 2030 represents one of the most ambitious national modernization projects of the twenty-first century, characterized by rapid institutional restructuring, accelerated economic diversification, and a digital-first governance model. This study conducts a meta-analysis of The Kingdom's transformation using the Tessema Pillars of Organizational Transformation and Agility (TPOTA) and the Tessema Multiple Intelligence Framework (TMIF), demonstrating how leadership alignment, cultural adaptation, organizational learning, and multidimensional intelligence collectively shaped national reform. The analysis highlights that Saudi Arabia's approach differs markedly from the UAE's more gradual, federated transformation model, offering a unique opportunity to compare two effective yet divergent modernization pathways. The findings reveal that Saudi Arabia integrated structural reforms with human capability development and the expansion of its digital ecosystem, establishing a coherent institutional architecture grounded in Vision Realization Programs, centralized coordination mechanisms, and data-driven governance. Through TPOTA, the study evaluates how leadership, culture, learning systems, knowledge management, and intelligence development supported transformation. At the same time, TMIF illuminates the roles of intellectual, emotional, spiritual, cultural, and social intelligences in shaping adaptive governance. The intersection of the agile mindset and sustainability further demonstrates how national systems can balance rapid change with long-term institutional resilience. Comparative insights from the UAE show that while both countries achieved significant progress in economic diversification, digital governance, and social modernization, their strategies reflect distinct governance philosophies: Saudi Arabia’s centralized, fast-paced reforms versus the UAE’s incremental, innovation-driven evolution. Together, these cases expand theoretical understanding of national transformation and demonstrate how the Tessema frameworks can be applied to evaluate systemic change. This meta-analysis contributes to the literature on public-sector transformation by providing a comprehensive model for analyzing how governance structures, human capabilities, and cultural dynamics interact to produce sustainable national development.

Suggested Citation

  • Dereje B. Tessema & Darrell Norman Burrell & Mohammed Hamad Al-Hajeri & Ayenachew Aseffa, Bereketeab Dereje & Bereketeab Dereje, 2025. "Divergent Paths to Modern Governance: A Meta-Analysis of Saudi Arabia’s Transformation Journey," Scientia Moralitas Journal, Scientia Moralitas, Research Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 253-281, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:253-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/355
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://scientiamoralitas.com/index.php/sm/article/view/355/262
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darwis Agustriyana & Gusni & Didi Tarmidi & Dinda Kayani Putri Bestari, 2019. "Organization Culture - Oriented Training Design," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 82-91, August.
    2. Dani Rodrik, 2008. "Normalizing Industrial Policy," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 28009, April.
    3. Andrews, Matt & Pritchett, Lant & Woolcock, Michael, 2017. "Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198747482.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexia Lochmann, 2022. "Diagnosing Drivers of Spatial Exclusion: Places, People, and Policies in South Africa’s Former Homelands," Growth Lab Working Papers 199, Harvard's Growth Lab.
    2. Magnus Henrekson & Anders Kärnä & Tino Sanandaji, 2022. "Schumpeterian entrepreneurship: coveted by policymakers but impervious to top-down policymaking," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 867-890, July.
    3. Dorina Peteva Georgieva & Varun Eknath & Michael Woolcock, 2025. "Examining business reform committees: findings from a new global dataset," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 300-327, July.
    4. Luciana Cingolani & Tim Hildebrandt, 2022. "Incentive Structures for the Adoption of Crowdsourcing in Public Policy: A Bureaucratic Politics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Dominic Williams, 2010. "Industrial Policy," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 25(8), pages 612-621, December.
    6. Alice Evans, 2019. "Incentivising Pro-Labour Reforms," CID Working Papers 349, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    7. Muhammad Kamran Nawaz & Ahmed Eltweri & Khalid Abbas & Wa’el Al-Karaki & Farag Edghiem & Scott Foster & Munir Adali, 2025. "Public Sector Transformation in Emerging Economies: Factors Affecting Change Adoption in Pakistan," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, March.
    8. Liao, Kerwin Xiang, 2025. "Beyond the Silicon Shield: TSMC, Geopolitical Turbulence, and the Institutional Politics of Global Tech Power," SocArXiv ybxm5_v2, Center for Open Science.
    9. Shruti Rajagopalan & Alex Tabarrok, 2021. "Simple rules for the developing world," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 341-362, December.
    10. Tang, Lianzhou & Xu, Wenli, 2025. "Patronage and pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. repec:osf:osfxxx:kucjs_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Guo, Jingyuan & Deng, Kent, 2024. "Laying off old guards to rebuild state capacity: Deng Xiaoping’s bloodless coup d’etat in post-Mao China, 1980-2000," Economic History Working Papers 126083, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.
    13. Kablan P. Kacou & Lavagnon A. Ika & Lauchlan T. Munro, 2025. "Killing Two Birds With One Stone? A New Pragmatist Perspective on the Rigor‐Relevance Gap in the Literature on Capacity Building Projects," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 45(5), pages 447-465, December.
    14. Kim, Galileu & Kumar, Tanu & Ramalho, Rita & Russell, Stuart Ehrlich, 2026. "Institutional Capacity for Policy Implementation : An Analytical Framework," Policy Research Working Paper Series 11279, The World Bank.
    15. Hakiman, Kamran & Sheely, Ryan, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Participatory Planning: How Flexible and Adaptive Governance Interventions Can Work in Practice," OSF Preprints kucjs, Center for Open Science.
    16. Matt Andrews, 2022. "This is How to Think About and Achieve Public Policy Success," CID Working Papers 413, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    17. Roll, Michael & Abu Qdais, Hani Ahmad & Kornprobst, Tim Lukas & Abu Jabal, Hussein & Suleiman, Yaser, 2025. "From exclusion to integration: How informal workers can improve urban waste management," IDOS Policy Briefs 29/2025, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), Bonn.
    18. Roy Valiant Salomo & Krisna Puji Rahmayanti, 2023. "Progress and Institutional Challenges on Local Governments Performance Accountability System Reform in Indonesia," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, October.
    19. Rafael Puyana & Daniel Payares & Indira Porto, 2021. "Efectividad del esquema de extensionistas tecnológicos : estudio base para el Pilar 2 del programa Fábricas de Productividad," Informes de Investigación 19277, Fedesarrollo.
    20. Alvaro Gonzalez & Luc Christiaensen & David Robalino, 2019. "Migration and Jobs," World Bank Publications - Reports 31807, The World Bank Group.
    21. Gustavsson Tingvall, Patrik & Videnord, Josefin, 2017. "Regional Effects of Publicly Sponsored R&D Grants on SME Performance," Ratio Working Papers 289, The Ratio Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:253-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.