IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sls/ipmsls/v49y20253.html

Labour Productivity as a Measure of Technological Change

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrich Kohli

Abstract

Average labour productivity (ALP) is today the productivity measure most used by policy makers, the media, and the general public. Economists recognize however that it is an inadequate measure of technological change. This is because ALP is a hybrid measure that captures both shifts in the production possibilities frontier and movements along the frontier itself. Thus, the flaw of ALP as a measure of technological change is not that it uses labour as a benchmark, which is a perfectly appropriate, but that, by being a partial measure of productivity, it ignores the role of capital, not just when accounting for technological change, but, even much more seriously, in production altogether. Put in other words, the numerator of the ALP ratio is not consistent with its denominator as a measure of technological change, and it is not the denominator that is at fault, but the numerator. A complete, or total measure of labour productivity (TLP) is therefore proposed and compared to the ALP and the better-known total factor productivity (TFP) measures. The relationship between the three productivity measures can also be analyzed in the dual price space. Numerical results for the U.S. private nonfarm business sector are provided as an illustration.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrich Kohli, 2025. "Labour Productivity as a Measure of Technological Change," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 49, pages 64-81, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:49:y:2025:3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csls.ca/ipm-archive/ipm-issue-49/labour-productivity-as-a-measure-of-technological-change/
    File Function: Version francaise disponible / French version available
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://csls.ca/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/IPM-Issue-49-3-Kohli.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sls:ipmsls:v:49:y:2025:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CSLS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cslssca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.