IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/resrep/v1i17y2014p86-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Social Enterprise Analysis: Motives, Processes and Barriers (Analiza porownawcza przedsiebiorstw spolecznych – motywy, procesy i bariery)

Author

Listed:
  • Fatih Ozturk

    (Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydzial Zarzadzania)

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship is a model that has a significant impact on the social transformation process. It has emerged as an effective and complementary method of achieving social change which has been poorly interpreted by governments and businesses. Today, many social enterprises are established to develop innovative solutions for catering to essential human needs. In this paper, emerging processes, advancements and organizational concepts of some social enterprises are reviewed in detail. This review puts forward that each of social initiatives has diverse dimen- sions, features, barriers and issues. Therefore, this article offers a comparative analysis identifying strengths and weaknesses of the social entrepreneurship model at the organizational level.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatih Ozturk, 2014. "A Comparative Social Enterprise Analysis: Motives, Processes and Barriers (Analiza porownawcza przedsiebiorstw spolecznych – motywy, procesy i bariery)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(17), pages 86-97.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:1:i:17:y:2014:p:86-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sim.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/studia_i_materialy_2014_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig P. Aubuchon & Rajdeep Sengupta, 2008. "The microfinance revolution: an overview," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 90(Jan), pages 9-30.
    2. Zahra, Shaker A. & Gedajlovic, Eric & Neubaum, Donald O. & Shulman, Joel M., 2009. "A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 519-532, September.
    3. Bertrand Moingeon & Muhammad Yunus & Laurence Lehmann-Ortega, 2010. "Building Social Business Models: Lessons from the Grameen Experience," Post-Print hal-00528385, HAL.
    4. Albert Hyunbae Cho, 2006. "Politics, Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Appraisal," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Johanna Mair & Jeffrey Robinson & Kai Hockerts (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship, chapter 4, pages 34-56, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. Seelos, Christian & Mair, Johanna & Battilana, Julie & Dacin, M. Tina, 2010. "The embeddedness of social entrepreneurship: Understanding variation across local communities," IESE Research Papers D/858, IESE Business School.
    6. Seelos, Christian & Mair, Johanna, 2005. "Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve the poor," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 241-246.
    7. James E. Austin, 2006. "Three Avenues for Social Entrepreneurship Research," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Johanna Mair & Jeffrey Robinson & Kai Hockerts (ed.), Social Entrepreneurship, chapter 3, pages 22-33, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iuliu Marin IVANESCU & Camelia M. GHEORGHE & Gina Gilet SZTRUTEN, 2013. "Social Entrepreneurship In Eu Region," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 8(4.1), pages 416-426, december.
    2. Chatterjee, Ira & Cornelissen, Joep & Wincent, Joakim, 2021. "Social entrepreneurship and values work: The role of practices in shaping values and negotiating change," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    3. Karina Cagarman & Jan Kratzer & Katharina Osbelt, 2020. "Social Entrepreneurship: Dissection of a Phenomenon through a German Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Siebold, Nicole, 2021. "Reference points for business model innovation in social purpose organizations: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 710-719.
    5. Petra C. M. Neessen & Cosmina L. Voinea & Els Dobber, 2021. "Business Models of Social Enterprises: Insight into Key Components and Value Creation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    6. Adélie Ranville & Marcos Barros, 2022. "Towards Normative Theories of Social Entrepreneurship. A Review of the Top Publications of the Field," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 407-438, October.
    7. Subhanjan Sengupta & Arunaditya Sahay & Francesca Croce, 2018. "Conceptualizing social entrepreneurship in the context of emerging economies: an integrative review of past research from BRIICS," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 771-803, December.
    8. Gupta, Parul & Chauhan, Sumedha & Paul, Justin & Jaiswal, M.P., 2020. "Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 209-229.
    9. Rohit Bhardwaj & Saurabh Srivastava & Sunali Bindra & Sumit Sangwan, 2023. "An ecosystem view of social entrepreneurship through the perspective of systems thinking," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 250-265, January.
    10. Pradeep Kumar Hota & Balaji Subramanian & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy, 2020. "Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Citation/Co-citation Analysis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 89-114, September.
    11. Ignas Bruder, 2021. "A Social Mission is Not Enough: Reflecting the Normative Foundations of Social Entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 487-505, December.
    12. Miguel Rivera-Santos & Diane Holt & David Littlewood & Ans Kolk, 2015. "Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa," Post-Print hal-02276715, HAL.
    13. Giuseppina Maria Cardella & Brizeida Raquel Hernández-Sánchez & Alcides Almeida Monteiro & José Carlos Sánchez-García, 2021. "Social Entrepreneurship Research: Intellectual Structures and Future Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Eduard-Gabriel Ceptureanu & Sebastian-Ion Ceptureanu & Mihai Cristian Orzan & Ovidiu Niculae Bordean & Violeta Radulescu, 2017. "Empirical Study on Sustainable Opportunities Recognition. A Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Joinery Industry Analysis Using Augmented Sustainable Development Process Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-36, September.
    15. Susana Bernardino & J. Freitas Santos, 2015. "Financing social ventures by crowdfunding: the influence of entrepreneurs’ personality traits," NIPE Working Papers 12/2015, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    16. Robin Stevens & Nathalie Moray & Johan Bruneel, 2015. "The Social and Economic Mission of Social Enterprises: Dimensions, Measurement, Validation, and Relation," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1051-1082, September.
    17. Balashankar Mulloth, 2021. "Exploring Social Business Pathways: Green Map System as a Case in Point," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(3), pages 190351-1903.
    18. Maria Rosa De Giacomo & Raimund Bleischwitz, 2020. "Business models for environmental sustainability: Contemporary shortcomings and some perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3352-3369, December.
    19. repec:sgm:resrep:y:2013:v:2013:i:1:p:43-55 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Yunjeong Kim & Hannah Jun, 2022. "Exploring Technology Innovation Factors, Government Support and Performance of Development-Related Social Enterprises: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    21. Geoffrey M. Kistruck & Paul W. Beamish, 2010. "The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(4), pages 735-761, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social enterprise; poverty; social change; barriers;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:resrep:v:1:i:17:y:2014:p:86-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.