IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v10i38y2012p167-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)

Author

Listed:
  • Ma³gorzata Pankowska

    (Wydzial Informatyki i Komunikacji, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach)

Abstract

Architecture in Information Technology domain constitutes a synergy of science and art of design of complex structures to ensure usefulness and to control the evolution of that complexity. The paper covers presentation of standards and essential models of enterprise architecture development. In the second part of the paper the author focuses on models for assessing the architecture, including methods and models of business -IT alignment, software architecture evaluation methods and corporate architecture maturity methods. The last part of the paper includes the corporate architecture multi-criteria evaluation model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma³gorzata Pankowska, 2012. "Corporate architecture evaluation methods (Metody oceny architektur korporacyjnych)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(38), pages 167-183.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:10:i:38:y:2012:p:167-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pankowska.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajiv Sabherwal & Yolande E. Chan, 2001. "Alignment Between Business and IS Strategies: A Study of Prospectors, Analyzers, and Defenders," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 11-33, March.
    2. Marc Lankhorst, 2005. "Enterprise Architecture at Work," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-540-27505-3, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo Ricciardi Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2022. "How can Strategy-as-Practice Enable Innovation under the Influence of Environmental Dynamism?," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(1), pages 200131-2001.
    2. Huigang Liang & Nianxin Wang & Yajiong Xue & Shilun Ge, 2017. "Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business—IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility?," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 863-879, December.
    3. Martin, Andrew & Dmitriev, Dmitry & Akeroyd, John, 2010. "A resurgence of interest in Information Architecture," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 6-12.
    4. Monideepa Tarafdar & Sufian Qrunfleh, 2017. "Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 925-938, February.
    5. Soojung Oh & Young U. Ryu & Hongsuk Yang, 2019. "Interaction effects between supply chain capabilities and information technology on firm performance," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 91-106, June.
    6. Jong Uk Kim & Rajiv Kishore, 2019. "Do we Fully Understand Information Systems Failure? An Exploratory Study of the Cognitive Schema of IS Professionals," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(6), pages 1385-1419, December.
    7. Otilia Maria Bordeianu, 2014. "The Need for Knowledge Management Strategy for Organisations Facing Changes," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 17(54), pages 3-23, December.
    8. Adilson Carlos Yoshikuni & José Eduardo R. Favaretto & Alberto Luiz Albertin & Fernando de Souza Meirelles, 2018. "The Influences of Strategic Information Systems on the Relationship between Innovation and Organizational Performance," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 15(5), pages 444-459, September.
    9. Rajiv Banker & Yi Liang & Narayan Ramasubbu, 2021. "Technical Debt and Firm Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 3174-3194, May.
    10. Sushil & Kamala Kannan Dinesh, 2022. "Structured Literature Review with TISM Leading to an Argumentation Based Conceptual Model," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 23(3), pages 387-407, September.
    11. Cao, Qing & Baker, Jeff & Schniederjans, Dara, 2014. "Bullwhip effect reduction and improved business performance through guanxi: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 217-230.
    12. Stefan Strecker & David Heise & Ulrich Frank, 2011. "RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-611, September.
    13. Emmanouil Ntanos & Gerasimos Dimitriou & Vassilis Bekiaris & Charalampos Vassiliou & Kostas Kalaboukas & Dimitris Askounis, 2018. "A model-driven software engineering workflow and tool architecture for servitised manufacturing," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 683-720, August.
    14. Siddharth Gaurav Majhi & Ambuj Anand & Arindam Mukherjee & Nripendra P. Rana, 2022. "The Optimal Configuration of IT-Enabled Dynamic Capabilities in a firm’s Capabilities Portfolio: a Strategic Alignment Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1435-1450, October.
    15. Dowlatshahi, Shad & Cao, Qing, 2006. "The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: An industry perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(2), pages 835-860, October.
    16. Carmen Pilar Marti & M. Rosa Rovira‐Val & Lisa G. J. Drescher, 2015. "Are Firms that Contribute to Sustainable Development Better Financially?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(5), pages 305-319, September.
    17. Taha Havakhor & Rajiv Sabherwal & Zachary R. Steelman & Sanjiv Sabherwal, 2019. "Relationships Between Information Technology and Other Investments: A Contingent Interaction Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 291-305, March.
    18. Wu, Tienhua & Jim Wu, Yen-Chun & Chen, Yenming J. & Goh, Mark, 2014. "Aligning supply chain strategy with corporate environmental strategy: A contingency approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 220-229.
    19. Booth, Marilyn E. & Philip, George, 2005. "Information systems management in practice: An empirical study of UK companies," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 287-302.
    20. Pinto Claudio Jose & Anunciacao Pedro Fernandes, 2020. "European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(2), pages 38-49, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:10:i:38:y:2012:p:167-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.