IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v7i2y2006p307-331.html

Transaction Costs in Public-Private Partnerships: A First Look at the Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • G. Dudkin
  • T. Välilä

Abstract

This paper presents the results of one of the first systematic analyses of the magnitude and determinants of transaction costs in public-private partnerships (PPPs). Given limited data availability, the analysis is confined to procurement-phase costs of bidding and contract negotiation, thus excluding costs related to contract monitoring and renegotiation in the operational phase. Notably, no attempt is made to compare transaction costs in PPPs to those in traditional public procurement of investment projects, nor to compare them to cost savings achieved through PPPs. Even so, some interesting results emerge. As regards the level of transaction costs in the procurement phase, it is estimated that the total costs amount on average to well over 10 percent of the capital value of the project. Transaction costs to the public sector and the winning bidder vary between sectors, and they are significantly higher in small projects (below £25 million) and in projects that take long (over 50 months) to procure. In contrast, neither experience in setting up partnerships nor the number of bidders affect the costs to the public sector and the winning bidder.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Dudkin & T. Välilä, 2006. "Transaction Costs in Public-Private Partnerships: A First Look at the Evidence," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 7(2), pages 307-331, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:7:i:2:y:2006:p:307-331
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lechosław Rojewski, 2008. "Contracting and Transaction Costs in the Public-Private Partnership. A Conception in the Light of the New Institutional Economy," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 21.
    2. Mai, The Vinh & Casady, Carter B., 2023. "Delivering transport infrastructure using state-owned enterprises (SOEs): A business history of Vietnam Expressway Corporation between 2004 and 2016," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 339-350.
    3. Mohammed A. Rajeh & John E. Tookey & James Olabode Bamidele Rotimi, 2015. "Developing a procurement path determination chart SEM-based approach," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(11-12), pages 921-941, December.
    4. Veronica Vecchi & Mark Hellowell, 2013. "Securing a Better Deal From Investors in Public Infrastructure Projects," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 109-129, January.
    5. Krzysztof Wasowski, 2013. "Analiza wspolpracy sektora publicznego z doradcami zewnetrznymi w realizacji projektow w systemie koncesyjnym oraz w formie partnerstwa publiczno-prywatnego w Polsce (Analysis of public sector coopera," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 11(43), pages 136-155.
    6. Marzanna Poniatowicz, 2017. "Transaction costs in the context of the requirements of effective finance management for local government units," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 16(3), pages 325-341, September.
    7. Fandel, Günter & Giese, Anke & Mohn, Brigitte, 2012. "Measuring synergy effects of a Public Social Private Partnership (PSPP) project," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 815-824.
    8. Galit Ashkenazi-Golan & Yevgeny Tsodikovich & Yannick Viossat, 2023. "I want to tell you? Maximizing revenue in first-price two-stage auctions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 76(4), pages 1329-1362, November.
    9. Gabriel OBERMANN, 2007. "The Role Of The State As Guarantor Of Public Services: Transaction Cost Issues And Empirical Evidence," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 475-500, September.
    10. Välilä, Timo, 2020. "An overview of economic theory and evidence of public-private partnerships in the procurement of (transport) infrastructure," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    11. Athena Roumboutsos & Ancor Suárez Alemán & Robert Ågren, 2017. "Construction firms in public–private partnerships: a place to grow," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(10), pages 627-640, October.
    12. Antonio Sánchez Soliño & Pilar Gago de Santos, 2009. "Transaction Costs in Transport Public--Private Partnerships: Comparing Procurement Procedures," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 389-406, May.
    13. Canıtez, Fatih & Çelebi, Dilay, 2018. "Transaction cost economics of procurement models in public transport: An institutional perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 116-125.
    14. Tajani, Francesco & Morano, Pierluigi & Di Liddo, Felicia, 2020. "The optimal combinations of the eligible functions in multiple property assets enhancement," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    15. Vecchi, Veronica & Hellowell, Mark & Gatti, Stefano, 2013. "Does the private sector receive an excessive return from investments in health care infrastructure projects? Evidence from the UK," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 243-270.
    16. Patrick Mabuza, 2019. "Is the Public Private Partnership Model the Right Vehicle for Public Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 211-222.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:7:i:2:y:2006:p:307-331. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Petra Van den Bempt to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.