IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

An economic assessment of congestion management methods for electricity transmission networks

Listed author(s):
  • R.A. Hakvoort
  • L.J. De Vries
Registered author(s):

    This paper provides an economic analysis of five different congestion management methods which can be used to handle congestion in electricity transmission networks: explicit auctioning, implicit auctioning, market splitting, redispatching and counter trading. These methods all have the objective to provide fair and non-discriminatory access to scarce transmission capacity in an economically efficient manner. This paper evaluates the theoretical economic efficiency of each of these methods. For this purpose an economic model is made of each method. In addition, some practical aspects of these congestion management methods are reviewed. The main conclusion is that all of the reviewed congestion management methods have, in theory, the potential of being economically efficient in the short term. That is, if they work well, they will all lead to the most efficient dispatch of generation given the existing transmission constraints. Their differences lie in the distribution of costs, their implementation costs, their practical feasibility, their susceptibility to strategic behaviour and their long-term incentives to generators and network operators. Finally, it is explained why congestion pricing methods (explicit auctioning, implicit auctioning and market splitting) in most cases are preferable as a solution for structural congestion over the corrective methods (redispatching and counter trading). They generate better economic incentives for users of the congested links which probably make them more efficient in the long term.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by Intersentia in its journal Competition and Regulation in Network Industries (CRNI).

    Volume (Year): 3 (2002)
    Issue (Month): 4 (September)
    Pages: 425-467

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:3:i:4:y:2002:p:425-467
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:3:i:4:y:2002:p:425-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Petra Van den Bempt)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.