IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sdb/social/v12y2023i1n8p63-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of accounting expertise to cost efficiency and application of unitary practices

Author

Listed:
  • Pantazi Anca Alexandra

    (Valahia University of Targoviste,)

  • Coman Elena Liliana

    (Valahia University of Targoviste)

Abstract

The current economic context both globally and nationally requires accounting experts to adopt an attitude focused on an approach to cost management and performance. In this sense, there is a need to implement the concept of "accounting expertise" that lies in defining "cost management" as the totality of methods, procedures and tools used in cost optimization, performance, risk management, to ensure a complete life cycle of the company. This concept proposes the approach from the point of view of the fundamentation of the decisions to build, maintain and renew the accounting expertise models of the lifetime as well as the consequences of these decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Pantazi Anca Alexandra & Coman Elena Liliana, 2023. "Contribution of accounting expertise to cost efficiency and application of unitary practices," Social-Economic Debates, Association for Entreprenorial Spirit Promotion, vol. 12(1), pages 63-71, octombrie.
    • Handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:12:y:2023:i:1:n:8:p:63-71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.economic-debates.ro/Articolul%203%20Pantazi%20Anca%20Alexandra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.economic-debates.ro/Articolul%203%20Pantazi%20Anca%20Alexandra.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ning Du & Kevin Stevens, 2011. "Numeric‐to‐verbal translation of probability expressions in SFAS 5," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(3), pages 248-262, March.
    2. Brun, Wibecke & Teigen, Karl Halvor, 1988. "Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both?," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 390-404, June.
    3. Bradbury, Michael E. & Schröder, Laura B., 2012. "The content of accounting standards: Principles versus rules," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-10.
    4. G.R. Chesley, 1986. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(2), pages 179-199, March.
    5. Parmod Chand & Lorne Cummings & Chris Patel, 2012. "The Effect of Accounting Education and National Culture on Accounting Judgments: A Comparative Study of Anglo-Celtic and Chinese Culture," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 153-182, May.
    6. Doupnik, Timothy S. & Richter, Martin, 2003. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions: a cross-national study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 15-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Doupnik, Timothy S. & Richter, Martin, 2003. "Interpretation of uncertainty expressions: a cross-national study," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 15-35, January.
    2. Ahsan, A.F.M. Mainul & Bose, Sudipta & Ali, Muhammad Jahangir, 2024. "Does Islamic religiosity influence professional accountants' judgments? Evidence from global convergence of IFRS," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Jerzy Gierusz & Katarzyna Kolesnik & Sylwia Silska Gembka, 2019. "The Interpretation of "in Context" Verbal Probability Expressions Used in International Financial Reporting Standards - Evidence from Poland," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(1), pages 25-45.
    4. Adam Harris & Adam Corner & Juemin Xu & Xiufang Du, 2013. "Lost in translation? Interpretations of the probability phrases used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in China and the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(2), pages 415-425, November.
    5. Zhang, Yuqian & De Zoysa, Anura & Cortese, Corinne, 2023. "Foreign language effect in accounting uncertainty expressions: Interpretation and probabilistic estimation," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    6. Lisa Evans & Rachel Baskerville & Katariina Nara, 2015. "Colliding Worlds: Issues Relating to Language Translation in Accounting and Some Lessons from Other Disciplines," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 51(1), pages 1-36, March.
    7. Pinto, Inês & Morais, Ana Isabel & Quick, Reiner, 2020. "The impact of the precision of accounting standards on the expanded auditor’s report in the European Union," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    8. Laaksonen, Jenni, 2022. "Translation, hegemony and accounting: A critical research framework with an illustration from the IFRS context," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    9. Poudel, Ghanshyam & Hellmann, Andreas & Perera, Hector, 2014. "The adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in a non-colonized developing country: The case of Nepal," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 209-216.
    10. Olav Torp & Ole Jonny Klakegg, 2016. "Challenges in Cost Estimation under Uncertainty—A Case Study of the Decommissioning of Barsebäck Nuclear Power Plant," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21, October.
    11. Mark Penno, 2022. "Concepts‐based Accounting Standards," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 58(2), pages 209-232, June.
    12. M Tavana & M A Sodenkamp, 2010. "A fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis model for advanced technology assessment at Kennedy Space Center," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(10), pages 1459-1470, October.
    13. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:6:p:683-695 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Prather-Kinsey, Jenice & Boyar, Scott & Hood, Anthony C., 2018. "Implications for IFRS principles-based and US GAAP rules-based applications: Are accountants’ decisions affected by work location and core self-evaluations?," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 61-69.
    15. Jie Hao & Viet T. Pham, 2022. "COVID‐19 Disclosures and Market Uncertainty: Evidence from 10‐Q Filings," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 238-266, June.
    16. Kenneth E. Harrison & Lawrence A. Tomassini, 1989. "L‘évaluation de la probabilité des pertes éventuelles: une étude empirique," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(2), pages 649-656, March.
    17. Steve Lin & Grace Pownall & Assma Sawani & Changjiang Wang, 2025. "The effect of the FASB-IASB convergence project on the rules- and principles-based nature of US GAAP and IFRS," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1500-1542, June.
    18. Mujeeb Saif Mohsen Al-Absy & Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail, 2019. "Accountants¡¯ Perception on the Factors Affecting the Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in Yemen," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 128-142, July.
    19. Kim, Jong-Hoon & Fujiyama, Keishi & Koga, Yuya, 2024. "The effect of voluntary international financial reporting standards adoption on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from Japan," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Landmann, Andreas & Biener, Christian & Eling, Martin & Santana, Maria Isabel, 2015. "Contract Nonperformance and Ambiguity in Insurance Markets," VfS Annual Conference 2015 (Muenster): Economic Development - Theory and Policy 113050, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    21. Hellmann, Andreas & Patel, Chris & Tsunogaya, Noriyuki, 2021. "Foreign-language effect and professionals’ judgments on fair value measurement: Evidence from Germany and the United Kingdom," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F63 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization - - - Economic Development
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sdb:social:v:12:y:2023:i:1:n:8:p:63-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adi Sava (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.economic-debates.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.