IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2015i1p18-29.html

Стратегия Системной Модернизации Отечественных Предприятий // The Strategy Of Domestic Enterprises System Upgrading

Author

Listed:
  • G. Kleiner

    (Financial University)

  • ГЕОРГИЙ Клейнер БОРИСОВИЧ

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

The article presents the concept of system upgrading of enterprises as a compromise between administrative and organizational modernization and organic evolution of the enterprise. In the article the concept of enterprise is clarified and developed. The empirical evidence about the state of Russian industrial enterpriseis examined; the key components and activities of the strategy of the domestic enterprises system upgrading are identified. It is shown that the definition and the nature of the enterprise depends on the adopted approach to structuring socio-economic space of the country at the macro level. The expedience of consideration the enterprise in the context of the four-tier structure of society “state - society - economy - business”, distinguishing business as a functionally separate sphere of activity, is substantiated. This approach allows us to more adequately describe the operating environment of the company and to analyze the relationship of internal and external factors of modernization. The remote survey data analysis of industrial enterprises, based on “Russian economic barometer” magazine sample collection, contained in the work, leads to the conclusion on an unfavourable state of more than a half of Russian enterprises. This allows to identify external and internal environment factors, preventing the activation of enterprises innovation activity. The violation of an internal integrity of enterprises, an unbalanced influence of the major groups of production participants on decision making, poor responsiveness to the interests of economic subjects when determining economic policy, are the leading factors. The combination of conceptual advancements with empirical data study and methodological achievements of the new theory of economic systems gives the opportunity to substantiate the main directions of the strategy of modernization of Russian enterprises as a necessary condition for the country’s socio-economic development. A set of strategic measures is put forward, affecting both the internal organization of enterprises and their relationship with governmental, market, business and social structures, which are aimed at creating a system of sustainable innovative development of the enterprises of all sectors of the economy, forms of ownership and organizational-legal forms, sizes and locations. Mechanisms of multi-level and multilateral strategic planning should become bearers of the proposed design to complement market mechanisms and administrative coordination of socio-economic entities at all levels of the economy. В статье выдвигается концепция системной модернизации предприятий как компромисса между административно-организационной модернизацией и органической эволюцией предприятия. Уточняется и развивается понятие предприятия, исследуются эмпирические данные о состоянии российских промышленных предприятий, определяются ключевые компоненты и мероприятия стратегии системной модернизации отечественных предприятий. Показывается, что определение понятия и сущности предприятия зависит от принятого подхода к структуризации социально-экономического пространства страны на макроуровне. Обосновывается целесообразность рассмотрения предприятия в контексте четырехзвенной структуры общества «государство - социум - экономика - бизнес», выделяющей бизнес как функционально обособленную сферу деятельности. Такой подход позволяет более адекватно описать среду функционирования предприятия и проанализировать взаимосвязи внутренних и внешних факторов модернизации. Анализ данных дистанционного обследования промышленных предприятий по выборке журнала «Российский экономический барометр», содержащейся в работе, приводит к выводу о неблагополучном состоянии более половины российских предприятий и позволяет выявить факторы внешней и внутренней среды, препятствующие активизации инновационной деятельности предприятий. Ведущими среди таких факторов являются нарушение внутренней целостности предприятий, несбалансированность влияния основных групп участников производства на принимаемые решения, слабый учет интересов развития хозяйствующих субъектов при определении экономической политики государства. Сочетание концептуальных продвижений с исследованием эмпирических данных и методологическими достижениями новой теории экономических систем дает возможность обосновать основные направления стратегии модернизации российских предприятий как необходимого условия социально-экономического развития страны. Предложен комплекс стратегических мер, которые затрагивают как внутреннюю организацию предприятий, так и отношения предприятий с государственными, рыночными и предпринимательскими и социальными структурами, а также нацелены на создание системы устойчивого инновационного развития предприятий всех отраслей экономики, форм собственности и организационно-правовых форм, размеров и территориального расположения. Несущим элементом предлагаемой конструкции должны стать механизмы многоуровневого и многостороннего стратегического планирования, дополняющие механизмы рыночной и административной координации деятельности социально-экономических субъектов всех уровней экономики.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Kleiner & ГЕОРГИЙ Клейнер БОРИСОВИЧ, 2015. "Стратегия Системной Модернизации Отечественных Предприятий // The Strategy Of Domestic Enterprises System Upgrading," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 5(1), pages 18-29.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2015:i:1:p:18-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/3/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Kleiner., 2013. "System Economics as a Platform for Development of Modern Economic Theory," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 6.
    2. Hashimzade, Nigar & Myles, Gareth & Black, John, 2017. "A Dictionary of Economics," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 5, number 9780198759430.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kleiner, George, 2023. "«Сознательно-Товарищеские» Начала Организационно-Управленческой Модели А. Богданова [“Consciously Comradely” Beginnings of A. Bogdanov's Organizational and Managerial Model]," MPRA Paper 119375, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Johannes Zahner, 2020. "Above, but close to two percent. Evidence on the ECB’s inflation target using text mining," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202046, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    3. George Kleiner, 2015. "State — Region — Field— Enterprise: Framework of Economics System Stability of Russia. Part 1," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 50-58.
    4. Sevdalina Hristova, 2022. "The Impact of the Public Procurement System Reform on Bulgarian Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 172-184.
    5. T. F. Safin, 2026. "Digital transformation as a factor of institutional environment change or social entrepreneurship," Scientific notes of the Russian academy of entrepreneurship, JSC “Publishing Agency “Science and Educationâ€, vol. 25(2).
    6. Yosuke Shigetomi & Keisuke Nansai & Shigemi Kagawa & Susumu Tohno, 2016. "Influence of income difference on carbon and material footprints for critical metals: the case of Japanese households," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 5(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Rubber In French Indochina," OSF Preprints yzdp6, Center for Open Science.
    8. Humburg, Anja, 2012. "Post-growth on the move: The environmental movement as agent of change for the transition to a post-growth economy - Evidence from Germany," Zukunftsimpulse 7, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy.
    9. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2022. "Market Formation In Tbong Khmum," OSF Preprints jg5qz, Center for Open Science.
    10. Xu, Mengmeng & Lin, Boqiang & Wang, Siquan, 2021. "Towards energy conservation by improving energy efficiency? Evidence from China’s metallurgical industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    11. repec:osf:socarx:4vfw7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Kristina Mensah & Christine Wieck & Bettina Rudloff, 2024. "Sustainable food consumption and Sustainable Development Goal 12: Conceptual challenges for monitoring and implementation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1109-1119, February.
    13. Eleni Zafeiriou & Constantinos Katrakilidis & Chrysanthi Pegiou, 2019. "Consumer Confidence on Heating Oil Prices: An Empirical Study of their Relationship for European Union in a Nonlinear Framework," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 63-90.
    14. Sándor Rózsa & Ileana Andreica & Gheorghe Poșta & Tincuța-Marta Gocan, 2022. "Sustainability of Agaricus blazei Murrill Mushrooms in Classical and Semi-Mechanized Growing System, through Economic Efficiency, Using Different Culture Substrates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Lozano-Minguez, E. & Kolios, A.J. & Brennan, F.P., 2011. "Multi-criteria assessment of offshore wind turbine support structures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 2831-2837.
    16. John I. Carruthers & Hanxue Wei, 2024. "What drives urban redevelopment activity? Evidence from machine learning and econometric analysis in three American cities," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 565-599, October.
    17. Karin Sjöstrand & Andreas Lindhe & Tore Söderqvist & Peter Dahlqvist & Lars Rosén, 2019. "Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Water Scarcity Mitigation under Uncertainty," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(12), pages 4335-4349, September.
    18. Mauricio Alejandro Oyarzo Aguilar & Dusan Paredes Araya, 2017. "The impact of mining patents on public education: evidence for mining municipalities in Chile," Documentos de Trabajo en Economia y Ciencia Regional 72, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Chile, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2017.
    19. Rio Yonson & Ilan Noy, 2018. "Measurement of Economic Welfare Risk and Resilience of the Philippine Regions," CESifo Working Paper Series 6953, CESifo.
    20. Istratov, V., 2019. "Habit Concepts in Economic Theory and their Algorithmization Suitability," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 41(1), pages 34-66.
    21. Kleiner, G. B., 2015. "State — Region — Branch — Enterprise: System Sustainability Framework of the Russian Economy," R-Economy, Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management, vol. 1(2), pages 212-225.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2015:i:1:p:18-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.