IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/guhrje/2017_3_10.html

Кластерный проект: понятия, типология, подходы к моделированию. Cluster project: concepts, typology and modeling approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Бурук А.Ф.

    (Новосибирский государственный университет)

  • Котёлкин Д.Д.
  • Марков Л.С.

Abstract

Рассмотрено сложившееся понимание соотношения понятий кластерной политики, кластерной программы и кластерного проекта. Дано авторское определение кластерного проекта и выделены его основные характерные черты. Рассмотрены основные характеристики вертикальных и горизонтальных кластеров. Выделены три типа кластерных проектов, реализуемых в горизонтальных кластерах, и их основные характеристики. Приведены теоретические представления о природе и особенностях конкуренции и кооперации, их основных видах, формах проявления, факторах, влияющих на них. Определены подходы к моделированию конкуренции и кооперации, обозначены их проблемные стороны. Выделены характеристики агентов при моделировании взаимодействия в многоагентных системах. Предложена концептуальная модель кооперационных и конкурентных взаимодействий между участниками кластерного проекта. In the article we considered the existing understanding of the relationship between the concepts of cluster policy, cluster program and cluster project, defined special features of cluster projects, and then developed our own definition of cluster project. Basic characteristics of industrial (vertical) and regional (horizontal) clusters were discussed. Then we istinguished three types of cluster projects and their main characteristics in horizontal clusters. The nature and features of competition and cooperation, their main types and forms were overviewed. We made hypotheses about factors that influence competition and cooperation. We described some already existing approaches to competition and cooperation modeling and their possible problems. Specific characteristics of agents in multi-agent system were defined. Conceptual agent-based model of competition and cooperation interactions between the members of the cluster project was proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Бурук А.Ф. & Котёлкин Д.Д. & Марков Л.С., 2017. "Кластерный проект: понятия, типология, подходы к моделированию. Cluster project: concepts, typology and modeling approaches," Мир экономики и управления // Вестник НГУ. Cерия: Cоциально-экономические науки, Socionet;Новосибирский государственный университет, vol. 17(3), pages 132-142.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:guhrje:2017_3_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://nsu.ru/rs/mw/link/Media:/66198/10.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boone, J. & van Ours, J.C. & van der Wiel, H.P., 2007. "How (Not) to Measure Competition," Discussion Paper 2007-32, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amoroso, S., 2013. "Heterogeneity of innovative, collaborative, and productive firm-level processes," Other publications TiSEM f5784a49-7053-401d-855d-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Michael Polder & Erik Veldhuizen, 2012. "Innovation and Competition in the Netherlands: Testing the Inverted-U for Industries and Firms," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 67-91, March.
    3. Russell Pittman, 2009. "Who Are You Calling Irrational? Marginal Costs, Variable Costs, and the Pricing Practices of Firms," EAG Discussions Papers 200903, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
    4. Giovanna Aguilar Andía, 2016. "COMPETENCIA EN EL MERCADO DE MICROCRÉDITOS PERUANO, una medición utilizando el Indicador de Boone," Documentos de Trabajo / Working Papers 2016-417, Departamento de Economía - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    5. Emmanuel C. Mamatzakis & Anh N. Vu, 2017. "The interplay between quantitative easing and risk: the case of the Japanese banking," Working Papers 226, Bank of Greece.
    6. repec:ptu:bdpart:b201210 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Mark Vancauteren & Bruno Henry de Frahan, 2011. "Trade Policy, Competition and Productivity: The Impact of EU Harmonization in the Dutch Food Processing Industry," De Economist, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 483-509, December.
    8. Eric E. O. Opoku & Isabel K. M. Yan & Kate Hynes, 2020. "Reaching up and reaching out: The impact of competition on firms’ productivity and export decisions," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 69-101, February.
    9. Henry van der Wiel & Harold Creusen & George van Leeuwen & Eugene van der Pijll, 2008. "Cross your border and look around," DEGIT Conference Papers c013_005, DEGIT, Dynamics, Economic Growth, and International Trade.
    10. Shijaku, Gerti, 2016. "Does bank competition affect bank stability after the global financial crisis?," MPRA Paper 79084, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Nuri Altintas & Alessandra Ferrari & Claudia Girardone, 2022. "Do financial reforms always improve banks efficiency and competition? A long-term analysis of Turkey’s experience," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 458-469, December.
    12. Mantin, Benny & Gillen, David & Delibasi, Tuba Toru, 2024. "Measuring the impact of scheduling overlap and market structure on prices: Evidence from the airline industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Heiseung Kim & Changhyun Park & Heesang Lee, 2019. "The Effect of Incremental Innovation and Switching-Over to Architectural Innovation on the Sustainable Performance of Firms: The Case of the NAND Flash Memory Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Ashim Kumar Kar & Ranjula Bali Swain, 2018. "Competition, Performance and Portfolio Quality in Microfinance Markets," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 30(5), pages 842-870, December.
    15. Pierre Blanchard & Emmanuel Dhyne & Catherine Fuss & Claude Mathieu, 2016. "(Not So) Easy Come, (Still) Easy Go? Footloose Multinationals Revisited," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 679-707, May.
    16. Roberto Alvarez & Rolando Campusano, 2014. "Does Competition Spur Innovation in Developing Countries?," Working Papers wp388, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    17. Bing Xu & Adrian Van Rixtel & Michiel Van Leuvensteijn, 2013. "Measuring bank competition in China: a comparison of new versus conventional approaches applied to loan markets," BIS Working Papers 422, Bank for International Settlements.
    18. Philip Du Caju & Catherine Fuss & Ladislav Wintr, 2009. "Understanding sectoral differences in downward real wage rigidity : workforce composition, institutions, technology and competition," Working Paper Research 156, National Bank of Belgium.
    19. João Amador & Ana Cristina Soares, 2018. "Competition in the Portuguese economy: insights from a profit elasticity approach," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 45(2), pages 339-365, May.
    20. Coccorese, Paolo, 2012. "Banks as ‘fat cats’: Branching and price decisions in a two-stage model of competition," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 338-363.
    21. Carlo Altomonte & Marcella Nicolini & Armando Rungi & Laura Ogliari, 2010. "Assessing the Competitive Behaviour of Firms in the Single Market: A Micro-based Approach," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 409, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D - Microeconomics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:guhrje:2017_3_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Виталия Маркова (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://socionet.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.