IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i5p1127-1153.html

Women and the Standard Workweek: Developing a Typology of Work Schedules in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer Whillans

    (University of Bristol, UK)

Abstract

When do women work? Which women work when? Much of our understanding of the temporal organisation of women’s paid work relies on oversimplified stylised estimates of duration and categorical indicators of work timing. Using United Kingdom Time Use Survey 2014–2015 workweek grid data and innovative sequence analysis, this research provides new empirical evidence by identifying a typology of women’s work schedules , including variants of and departures from the standard workweek. Furthermore, sociodemographic and job characteristics are found to be associated with different work schedules. A feminist evaluation of findings highlights the insufficiency of the standard/nonstandard dichotomy and presents new ways of describing worktime that better capture the complex and diverse experiences of women. It concludes that, while the standard workweek is not strictly identifiable as a type of schedule, it acts as an organising principle of worktime among contemporary working women.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer Whillans, 2025. "Women and the Standard Workweek: Developing a Typology of Work Schedules in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1127-1153, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:1127-1153
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251336933
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251336933
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251336933?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Heejung Chung & Tanja Lippe, 2020. "Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 365-381, September.
    2. Laurent Lesnard & Thibaut Saint Pol, 2009. "Patterns of Workweek Schedules in France," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 93(1), pages 171-176, August.
    3. Pierre Walthery & Jonathan Gershuny, 2019. "Improving Stylised Working Time Estimates with Time Diary Data: A Multi Study Assessment for the UK," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 1303-1321, August.
    4. Laurent Lesnard & Man Yee Kan, 2011. "Investigating scheduling of work: a two‐stage optimal matching analysis of workdays and workweeks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 174(2), pages 349-368, April.
    5. Colette Fagan & Linda McDowell & Diane Perron & Kevin Ward & Kathryn Ray, 2008. "Class Difference in Mothers’ Work Schedules and Assessments of their ‘Work–Life Balance’ in Dual-Earner Couples in Britain," Chapters, in: Jacqueline Scott & Shirley Dex & Heather Joshi (ed.), Women and Employment, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Vanessa Beck & Paul Brook & Bob Carter & Ian Clark & Andy Danford & Nik Hammer & Shireen Kanji & Melanie Simms, 2016. "Work, employment and society sans frontières: extending and deepening our reach," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 30(2), pages 211-219, April.
    7. Tracey Warren & Gillian Pascall & Elizabeth Fox, 2010. "Gender Equality in Time: Low-Paid Mothers' Paid and Unpaid Work in the UK," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 193-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah M. Flood & Rachelle Hill & Katie R. Genadek, 2018. "Daily Temporal Pathways: A Latent Class Approach to Time Diary Data," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 117-142, January.
    2. Mairi Maclean & Gareth Shaw & Charles Harvey, 2024. "Demanding a Voice? Worker Participation in the British Interwar Management Movement," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(6), pages 1680-1702, December.
    3. Elena Baglioni, 2022. "The Making of Cheap Labour across Production and Reproduction: Control and Resistance in the Senegalese Horticultural Value Chain," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 445-464, June.
    4. Agnieszka Kasperska & Anna Matysiak & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2024. "Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Fagan, Colette. & Norman, Helen. & Smith, Mark. & Gonzalez Menendez, María C., 2014. "In search of good quality part-time employment," ILO Working Papers 994839683402676, International Labour Organization.
    6. Annie Irvine & Nikolas Rose, 2024. "How Does Precarious Employment Affect Mental Health? A Scoping Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Evidence from Western Economies," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 418-441, April.
    7. Arunas Juska & Jekaterina Navicke, 2022. "Labour market flexibilisation in Lithuania: Outcomes and impacts on gender differences in work arrangements," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 502-525, September.
    8. Johanna Elisabeth Pauliks, 2025. "Is Workplace Flexibility Penalised? The Gendered Consequences of Working from Home for the Wages of Parents and Childless Employees in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1059-1081, October.
    9. Laurent Lesnard, 2010. "Setting Cost in Optimal Matching to Uncover Contemporaneous Socio-Temporal Patterns," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 38(3), pages 389-419, February.
    10. Bettina Stadler, 2026. "Flexible working hours: Benefit or burden? A study of occupational differences in five European countries," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 32(1), pages 25-42, March.
    11. Nur Idayu Badrolhisam & Rossilah Jamil, 2025. "Gender flexible work arrangements: a global bibliometric analysis with a focus on Asian content," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Bin Xiong & Baocheng Yu, 2024. "The Impact of Internet Development on Youth’s Job Quality in the Digital Economy Era: Transmission Mechanism and Empirical Test," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 269-294, October.
    13. 白, 祁明, 2025. "The Consequences of Working from home on Well-Being: Evidence from the French Workforce," MPRA Paper 123194, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Stefania Capecchi & Francesca Iorio & Nunzia Nappo, 2024. "Occupational Stress, Working from Home, and Job Sustainability: Another Gender Issue?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 1193-1218, December.
    15. Smyth, Emer & Russell, Helen, 2021. "Fathers and children from infancy to middle childhood," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS130.
    16. Edoardo Beretta & Marco Desogus & Soorjith Illickal Karthikeyan, 2023. "The effect of reducing wages of remote workers on society. A preliminary assessment," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 76(307), pages 373-392.
    17. Anna Matysiak & Agnieszka Kasperska & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2025. "Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Work from Home on Careers in the Post-Covid Context," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1103-1126, October.
    18. Heejung Chung & Shiyu Yuan, 2025. "Did COVID‐19 Level the Playing Field or Entrench It? Comparing Patterns of Homeworking by Ethnicity, Gender and Migration Status, Before, During and After COVID‐19 in the UK," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 236-250, May.
    19. Lauren Ryan & Brendan Churchill & Leah Ruppanner, 2026. "The Gendered Flexibility Paradox and Remote-First Work: How Working Parents Reconcile Work and Care," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 203-224, April.
    20. Yvonne Lott & Clare Kelliher & Heejung Chung, 2022. "Reflecting the changing world of work? A critique of existing survey measures and a proposal for capturing new ways of working," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 28(4), pages 457-473, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:5:p:1127-1153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.