IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v40y2026i2p203-224.html

The Gendered Flexibility Paradox and Remote-First Work: How Working Parents Reconcile Work and Care

Author

Listed:
  • Lauren Ryan

    (University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Brendan Churchill

    (University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Leah Ruppanner

    (University of Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

Recent technological advances and globalised distribution of work have accelerated the rise of remote-first organisations where everyone works remotely, yet the effects of this approach on working parents remain underexplored. Drawing on qualitative interviews with 25 mothers and 16 fathers from 31 remote-first organisations, this study examines the gendered impact of standardised remote-first flexibility on work–family reconciliation. Findings show that remote-first work enhances location and schedule freedom, allowing parents to sustain a dual devotion to work and family. Fathers used this flexibility to increase engagement with domestic tasks and caregiving, while mothers focused on meeting work demands (in addition to caregiving responsibilities). The use of remote-first working arrangements increased employee trust and empathy among working parents, reducing flexibility stigma concerns. While fathers resisted tendencies to overwork, the remote-first model perpetuated the gendered flexibility paradox for mothers, leading to increased labour expansion and self-exploitation in both paid and unpaid work.

Suggested Citation

  • Lauren Ryan & Brendan Churchill & Leah Ruppanner, 2026. "The Gendered Flexibility Paradox and Remote-First Work: How Working Parents Reconcile Work and Care," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 203-224, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:203-224
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251373035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251373035
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251373035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:40:y:2026:i:2:p:203-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.