IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v17y2003i1p159-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconciling Competing Pressures for Working-time Flexibility

Author

Listed:
  • Anne McBride

    (Manchester School of Management, UK a.mcbride@umist.ac.uk)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne McBride, 2003. "Reconciling Competing Pressures for Working-time Flexibility," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 17(1), pages 159-170, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:17:y:2003:i:1:p:159-170
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017003017001273
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017003017001273
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017003017001273?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Arrowsmith & Keith Sisson, 1999. "Pay and Working Time: Towards Organization-based Systems?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 37(1), pages 51-75, March.
    2. Horrell, Sara & Rubery, Jill, 1991. "Gender and Working Time: An Analysis of Employers' Working-Time Policies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 15(4), pages 373-391, December.
    3. Wood, Stephen, 1999. "Family-friendly management: testing the various perspectives," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 168, pages 99-116, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nkechinyelu Ann Edeh & Sarah Riley & Patrizia Kokot‐Blamey, 2022. "The production of difference and “becoming Black”: The experiences of female Nigerian doctors and nurses working in the National Health Service," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 520-535, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robert Drago, 1995. "Divide and Conquer in Australia: A Study of Labor Segmentation," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 25-70, March.
    2. Richard Hobbs & Wanjiru Njoya, 2005. "Regulating the European Labour Market: Prospects and Limitations of a Reflexive Governance Approach," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 43(2), pages 297-319, June.
    3. Martin Watts, 2003. "The Evolution of Occupational Gender Segregation in Australia: Measurement and Interpretation," Australian Journal of Labour Economics (AJLE), Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre (BCEC), Curtin Business School, vol. 6(4), pages 631-655, December.
    4. Mark Smith & Stefan Zagelmeyer, 2010. "Working time management and SME performance in Europe," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 392-409, July.
    5. Lonnie Golden, 2009. "A Brief History of Long Work Time and the Contemporary Sources of Overwork," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(2), pages 217-227, January.
    6. Chung, Heejung, 2008. "Do institutions matter? Explaining the use of working time flexibility arrangements of companies across 21 European countries using a multilevel model focusing on country level determinants," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Labor Market Policy and Employment SP I 2008-107, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Jonathan Trevor & William Brown, 2014. "The Limits on Pay as a Strategic Tool: Obstacles to Alignment in Non-Union Environments," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 52(3), pages 553-578, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:17:y:2003:i:1:p:159-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.