IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v12y2007i3p43-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism

Author

Listed:
  • Libby Bishop

Abstract

Though secondary analysis of qualitative data is becoming more prevalent, relatively few methodological studies exist that provide reflection on the actual, not idealised, process. This paper offers a reflexive account of secondary analysis focused on the topic of convenience food and choice. Several phases of the research process are examined: understanding context, defining a subject area, finding data and sampling, later sampling and topic refinement, and relating to transcripts. For each phase, I explore if reusing data is different from using it in the first instance, and if so, how those differences manifest themselves. The paper closes with reflections on the differences, similarities, and relationships between primary and secondary analysis of qualitative data. Although differences exist regarding the researcher-respondent relationship, primary and secondary analyses are more alike than not. The suitability of each approach can only be assessed in light of a particular research question.

Suggested Citation

  • Libby Bishop, 2007. "A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(3), pages 43-56, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:3:p:43-56
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1553
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Harvey & Stephen Quilley & Huw Beyon, 2002. "Exploring the Tomato," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2916.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maureen Haaker & Bethany Morgan-Brett, 2017. "Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    2. Kahryn Hughes & Jason Hughes & Anna Tarrant, 2022. "Working at a remove: continuous, collective, and configurative approaches to qualitative secondary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 375-394, April.
    3. Abigail Knight & Julia Brannen & Rebecca O'connell, 2015. "Using Narrative Sources from the Mass Observation Archive to Study Everyday Food and Families in Hard Times: Food Practices in England during 1950," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 29-72, February.
    4. Corine van Emmerik, 2024. "Ethical Reflexivity, Care, and Slippery Data: Lessons From Working With the Mass Observation Project," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(3), pages 758-766, September.
    5. Jo Haynes & Demelza Jones, 2012. "A Tale of Two Analyses[1]: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, May.
    6. Sasha Williams & Ian Law, 2012. "Legitimising Racism: An Exploration of the Challenges Posed by the Use of Indigeneity Discourses by the Far Right," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sally Gee & Andrew McMeekin, 2011. "Eco-Innovation Systems and Problem Sequences: The Contrasting Cases of US and Brazilian Biofuels," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 301-315.
    2. Chad M. Baum, 2013. "Mass-Produced Food: the Rise and Fall of the Promise of Health and Safety," Papers on Economics and Evolution 2013-03, Philipps University Marburg, Department of Geography.
    3. Pamela K. Robinson, 2009. "Responsible retailing: Regulating fair and ethical trade," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(7), pages 1015-1026.
    4. Pamela Robinson, 2010. "Responsible Retailing: The Practice of CSR in Banana Plantations in Costa Rica," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 279-289, February.
    5. Sian Moore & Kirsty Newsome, 2018. "Paying for Free Delivery: Dependent Self-Employment as a Measure of Precarity in Parcel Delivery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(3), pages 475-492, June.
    6. Sarah Nettleton & Emma Uprichard, 2011. "‘A Slice of Life’: Food Narratives and Menus from Mass-Observers in 1982 and 1945," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 99-107, June.
    7. Samoggia, Antonella & Arvola, Anne & Bertazzoli, Aldo & Gurinovic, Mirjana & Hendrixson, Vaiva & Rivarolifi, Sergio & Ruggeri, Arianna, 2014. "Offering Low-Cost Healthy Food: an Exploration of Food Manufacturers’ and Retailers’ Perspectives," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(4), pages 1-32, November.
    8. Amaranta Herrero & Fern Wickson & Rosa Binimelis, 2015. "Seeing GMOs from a Systems Perspective: The Need for Comparative Cartographies of Agri/Cultures for Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(8), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Dawn Lyon, 2016. "Doing Audio-Visual Montage to Explore Time and Space: The Everyday Rhythms of Billingsgate Fish Market," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(3), pages 57-68, August.
    10. Sally Randles & Peter Dicken, 2004. "‘Scale’ and the Instituted Construction of the Urban: Contrasting the Cases of Manchester and Lyon," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(11), pages 2011-2032, November.
    11. Mark Harvey & Andrew McMeekin, 2013. "Capitalism: restless and unbounded? Some neo-Polanyian and Schumpeterian reflections," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(7), pages 666-683, October.
    12. Mark Harvey & Sarah Pilgrim, 2013. "Rudderless in a Sea of Yellow: The European Political Economy Impasse for Renewable Transport Energy," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 364-390, June.
    13. Miriam A. Glucksmann, 2004. "Call configurations: varieties of call centre and divisions of labour," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 18(4), pages 795-811, December.
    14. Robertson, Paul L. & Patel, Parimal R., 2007. "New wine in old bottles: Technological diffusion in developed economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 708-721, June.
    15. Harvey Mark & Metcalfe Stan, 2004. "The Ordering of Change: Polanyi, Schumpeter and the Nature of The Market Mechanism," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-31, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:3:p:43-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.