IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v20y2015i1p29-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Narrative Sources from the Mass Observation Archive to Study Everyday Food and Families in Hard Times: Food Practices in England during 1950

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Knight
  • Julia Brannen
  • Rebecca O'connell

Abstract

By using examples from food and domestic life in England during 1950, this paper examines the use of narrative archival sources as a methodological alternative to researching everyday food practices by traditional research methods, such as interviewing. Through the analysis of three diaries written for the Mass Observation Archive, and the everyday food practices expressed in these diaries, we consider the benefits and challenges of using narrative archival diary data to gain insights into food and eating during times of austerity. Before presenting and discussing the cases, we outline some of the challenges of researching food practices as a result of the muted, moral and mundane aspects of such practices. We then describe the study on which this paper is based, including a discussion of our methods and the reasons for using diaries and selecting our cases. Following this, we set the scene for understanding food and eating in 1950s Britain, such as contextual background about rationing during the Second World War, government policy and propaganda of the time. In our analysis of the three diaries, we discuss some of the ways in which the data have enabled us to ‘get at’ and provide insights into habitual food practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Knight & Julia Brannen & Rebecca O'connell, 2015. "Using Narrative Sources from the Mass Observation Archive to Study Everyday Food and Families in Hard Times: Food Practices in England during 1950," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(1), pages 29-72, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:29-72
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.3579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.3579
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.3579?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mike Savage, 2007. "Changing Social Class Identities in Post-War Britain: Perspectives from Mass-Observation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(3), pages 14-26, May.
    2. Angela Meah & Matt Watson, 2011. "Saints and Slackers: Challenging Discourses about the Decline of Domestic Cooking," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 108-120, June.
    3. Wendy Wills & Kathryn Backett-Milburn & Sue Gregory & Julia Lawton, 2008. "‘If the Food Looks Dodgy I Dinnae Eat It’: Teenagers’ Accounts of Food and Eating Practices in Socio-Economically Disadvantaged Families," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(1), pages 67-79, January.
    4. Liz Moor & Emma Uprichard, 2014. "The Materiality of Method: The Case of the Mass Observation Archive," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 136-146, September.
    5. Libby Bishop, 2007. "A Reflexive Account of Reusing Qualitative Data: Beyond Primary/Secondary Dualism," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(3), pages 43-56, May.
    6. Sarah Nettleton & Emma Uprichard, 2011. "‘A Slice of Life’: Food Narratives and Menus from Mass-Observers in 1982 and 1945," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 99-107, June.
    7. Emma Casey, 2014. "‘Mass Gambling’ from 1947 to 2011: Controversies and Pathologies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 203-213, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Libby Bishop & Arja Kuula-Luumi, 2017. "Revisiting Qualitative Data Reuse," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(1), pages 21582440166, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dana Wilson-Kovacs, 2014. "‘Clearly Necessary’, ‘Wonderful’ and ‘Engrossing’? Mass Observation Correspondents Discuss Forensic Technologies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 161-176, September.
    2. Rachel Hurdley, 2014. "Synthetic sociology and the ‘long workshop’: How Mass Observation ruined meta-methodology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 177-202, September.
    3. Mikko Jauho & Johanna Mäkelä & Mari Niva, 2016. "Demarcating Social Practices: The Case of Weight Management," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(2), pages 10-22, May.
    4. Maureen Haaker & Bethany Morgan-Brett, 2017. "Developing Research-Led Teaching: Two Cases of Practical Data Reuse in the Classroom," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, April.
    5. Kahryn Hughes & Jason Hughes & Anna Tarrant, 2022. "Working at a remove: continuous, collective, and configurative approaches to qualitative secondary analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 375-394, April.
    6. Rose Lindsey & Sarah Bulloch, 2014. "A Sociologist's Field Notes to the Mass Observation Archive: A Consideration of the Challenges of ‘re-Using’ Mass Observation Data in a Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 147-160, September.
    7. Kirstie J. O’Neill & Adrian K. Clear & Adrian Friday & Mike Hazas, 2019. "‘Fractures’ in food practices: exploring transitions towards sustainable food," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 225-239, June.
    8. Liz Moor & Emma Uprichard, 2014. "The Materiality of Method: The Case of the Mass Observation Archive," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 136-146, September.
    9. Jo Haynes & Demelza Jones, 2012. "A Tale of Two Analyses[1]: The Use of Archived Qualitative Data," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, May.
    10. Friedman, Sam, 2022. "(Not) bringing your whole self to work: the gendered experience of upward mobility in the UK Civil Service," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113417, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Viktoria Wallin & Ida Carlander & Per‐Olof Sandman & Britt‐Marie Ternestedt & Cecilia Håkanson, 2014. "Maintaining ordinariness around food: partners’ experiences of everyday life with a dying person," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(19-20), pages 2748-2756, October.
    12. Suzanne Rotheram & Jessie Cooper & Sara Ronzi & Benjamin Barr & Margaret Whitehead, 2020. "What is the qualitative evidence concerning the risks, diagnosis, management and consequences of gastrointestinal infections in the community in the United Kingdom? A systematic review and meta-ethnog," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
    13. Emma Casey, 2014. "‘Mass Gambling’ from 1947 to 2011: Controversies and Pathologies," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 19(3), pages 203-213, September.
    14. Sarah Irwin & Mandy Winterton, 2012. "Qualitative Secondary Analysis and Social Explanation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(2), pages 1-12, May.
    15. Jennifer Kettle, 2016. "‘I Can't Settle If It's Not Tidy; I Blame that on My Mum’: Exploring Women's Relational Household Work Narratives," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(4), pages 30-43, November.
    16. Sarah Nettleton & Emma Uprichard, 2011. "‘A Slice of Life’: Food Narratives and Menus from Mass-Observers in 1982 and 1945," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(2), pages 99-107, June.
    17. Wendy J. Wills, 2012. "Using Spoken and Written Qualitative Methods to Explore Children's and Young People's Food and Eating Practices," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 17(3), pages 114-123, August.
    18. Sam Friedman, 2022. "(Not) bringing your whole self to work: The gendered experience of upward mobility in the UK Civil Service," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 502-519, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:20:y:2015:i:1:p:29-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.