IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v12y2007i1p129-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘It's Made a Huge Difference’: Recognition, Rights and the Personal Significance of Civil Partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Beccy Shipman
  • Carol Smart

Abstract

In this paper we map briefly some of the arguments around the meaning and significance of the introduction of Civil Partnership in England and Wales, and in this way show how contested these meanings are with some groups profoundly against this legal reform and others supporting it, but for a mixture of reasons. We then turn to our empirical data based on interviews with same-sex couples to explore the extent to which these arguments and issues are part of the everyday decision making processes of same sex couples who have decided to register their partnerships or to undergo a commitment ceremony of some kind. In doing this, we were interested in how people make their own meanings (if they do) and whether they actually frame important decisions in their lives around the ideas that are part of the current political debates. We are interested in whether the public debates (such as legal equality) are featured in the accounts of our interviewees but we are also concerned to reveal whether other issues are important to same sex couples when they decide to have their relationship publicly recognised in some way. We found for example that while equality and legal rights were important, love, commitment and respect from wider family featured just as strongly in people's accounts.

Suggested Citation

  • Beccy Shipman & Carol Smart, 2007. "‘It's Made a Huge Difference’: Recognition, Rights and the Personal Significance of Civil Partnership," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 12(1), pages 129-139, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:1:p:129-139
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1340
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jane Lewis, 2001. "The End of Marriage?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1974.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vogler, Carolyn & Brockmann, Michaela & Wiggins, Richard D., 2008. "Managing money in new heterosexual forms of intimate relationships," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 552-576, April.
    2. Elyakim Kislev, 2020. "Social Capital, Happiness, and the Unmarried: a Multilevel Analysis of 32 European Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(5), pages 1475-1492, November.
    3. Ann Berrington & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Paulina Trevena, 2015. "Commitment and the changing sequence of cohabitation, childbearing, and marriage," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(12), pages 327-362.
    4. Simon Duncan, 2011. "Personal Life, Pragmatism and Bricolage," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(4), pages 129-140, December.
    5. Jill Reynolds, 2006. "Patterns in the Telling: Single Women's Intimate Relationships with Men," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 98-110, September.
    6. Trude Lappegård & Turid Noack, 2015. "The link between parenthood and partnership in contemporary Norway - Findings from focus group research," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(9), pages 287-310.
    7. Arieke Rijken & Trudie Knijn, 2009. "Couples’ decisions on having a first child," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 21(26), pages 765-802.
    8. Peter Taylor‐Gooby & Jens O. Zinn, 2006. "Current Directions in Risk Research: New Developments in Psychology and Sociology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(2), pages 397-411, April.
    9. Sasha Roseneil, 2006. "On Not Living with a Partner: Unpicking Coupledom and Cohabitation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(3), pages 111-124, September.
    10. Del Bono, Emilia, 2004. "Pre-Marital Fertility and Labour Market Opportunities: Evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study," IZA Discussion Papers 1320, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Susanne Elsas, 2013. "Pooling and Sharing Income within Households: A Satisfaction Approach," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 587, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Stefan Buzar & Ray Hall & Philip E Ogden, 2007. "Beyond Gentrification: The Demographic Reurbanisation of Bologna," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(1), pages 64-85, January.
    13. Kathleen E Kiernan, 2005. "Non-residential Fatherhood and Child Involvement: Evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study," CASE Papers 100, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    14. Graham Crow, 2005. "Towards a Sociology of Endings," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 159-168, November.
    15. Martina Klett-Davies, 2005. "The Diversity of State Benefit Dependent Lone Mothers: The Use of Type Categories as an Analytical Tool," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 31-45, June.
    16. Yean-Ju Lee, 2022. "Lingering Male Breadwinner Norms as Predictors of Family Satisfaction and Marital Instability," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    17. Charlotte Morris, 2015. "Considerations of Equality in Heterosexual Single Mothers’ Intimacy Narratives," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 20(4), pages 133-143, November.
    18. Julia Carter, 2017. "Why Marry? The Role of Tradition in Women's Marital Aspirations," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Pahl, Jan, 2008. "Family finances, individualisation, spending patterns and access to credit," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 577-591, April.
    20. Lynn Jamieson & Fran Wasoff & Roona Simpson, 2009. "Solo-Living, Demographic and Family Change: The Need to know more about men," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 14(2), pages 20-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:12:y:2007:i:1:p:129-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.