IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v62y2016i1p21-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Managing the terror of a dangerous world: Political attitudes as predictors of mental health stigma

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph S DeLuca
  • Philip T Yanos

Abstract

Background: Previous research has associated self-reported political conservatism to mental health stigma. Although the limitations of self-reported political attitudes are well documented, no study has evaluated this relationship from a more nuanced perspective of sociopolitical identity. Aims: To assess the relationship between political attitudes and mental health stigma (i.e. negative stereotypes and intended social distance), particularly from a standpoint of Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) – a more specific measure of political conservatism. Method: A sample of 505 New York State residents completed an online survey. Results: The results of this study indicated significant relationships between endorsements of self-reported conservatism and RWA to negative stereotypes and social distance in relation to mental illness. Individuals with ‘High RWA’ were more likely to see individuals with mental illness as dangerous and unpredictable, and less willing to want to socially associate with individuals with mental illness. These results remained statistically significant even when controlling for other factors that consistently predict mental health stigma. Negative stereotypes also partially mediated individuals with RWA’s significant relationship to social distance. Conclusion: Characteristics of political conservatives and right-wing authoritarians (e.g. threat-aversion, personal responsibility) are predictive of mental health stigma. Terror Management Theory may also help to explain this phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph S DeLuca & Philip T Yanos, 2016. "Managing the terror of a dangerous world: Political attitudes as predictors of mental health stigma," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 62(1), pages 21-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:1:p:21-30
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764015589131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764015589131
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764015589131?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pescosolido, B.A. & Medina, T.R. & Martin, J.K. & Long, J.S., 2013. "The "backbone" of stigma: Identifying the Global core of public prejudice associated with mental illness," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(5), pages 853-860.
    2. Jim A C Everett, 2013. "The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Evans & Willem Sleegers & Žan Mlakar, 2020. "Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 401-412, May.
    2. Sgroi, Daniel & Yeo, Jonathan & Zhuo, Shi, 2021. "Ingroup Bias with Multiple Identities: The Case of Religion and Attitudes Towards Government Size," IZA Discussion Papers 14714, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Sylvia Beyer, 2020. "Relation between College Students’ Conservatism and Negative Stereotypes about Social Groups," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Matej Avbelj & Janez Šušteršič, 2019. "Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodology for Measuring Multidimensional Judicial Ideology," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 129-159, June.
    5. Xi Chen & Jingjing Su & Daniel Thomas Bressington & Yan Li & Sau Fong Leung, 2022. "Perspectives of Nursing Students towards Schizophrenia Stigma: A Qualitative Study Protocol," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Noor Ahmed Giasuddin & Itzhak Levav & Gilad Gal, 2015. "Mental health stigma and attitudes to psychiatry among Bangladeshi medical students," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(2), pages 137-147, March.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:401-412 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. James Livingston & Nimesh Patel & Stephanie Bryson & Peter Hoong & Rodrick Lal & Marina Morrow & Sepali Guruge, 2018. "Stigma associated with mental illness among Asian men in Vancouver, Canada," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(7), pages 679-689, November.
    9. Gaddis, S. Michael & Ramirez, Daniel & Hernandez, Erik L., 2018. "Contextualizing public stigma: Endorsed mental health treatment stigma on college and university campuses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 183-191.
    10. Mehmet Özer Demir & Biagio Simonetti & Murat Alper Başaran & Sezgin Irmak, 2021. "Voter Classification Based on Susceptibility to Persuasive Strategies: A Machine Learning Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 355-370, May.
    11. Kevin B. Smith & John R. Alford & John R. Hibbing & Nicholas G. Martin & Peter K. Hatemi, 2017. "Intuitive Ethics and Political Orientations: Testing Moral Foundations as a Theory of Political Ideology," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(2), pages 424-437, April.
    12. Jorge Matute & José Luis Sánchez-Torelló & Ramon Palau-Saumell, 2021. "The Influence of Organizations’ Tax Avoidance Practices on Consumers’ Behavior: The Role of Moral Reasoning Strategies, Political Ideology, and Brand Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 369-386, November.
    13. Anaïs Le Jeannic & Kathleen Turmaine & Coralie Gandré & Marie-Amélie Vinet & Morgane Michel & Karine Chevreul & on behalf of the PRINTEMPS Consortium, 2023. "Defining the Characteristics of an e-Health Tool for Suicide Primary Prevention in the General Population: The StopBlues Case in France," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-23, June.
    14. van Esch, Patrick & Cui, Yuanyuan (Gina) & Jain, Shailendra Pratap, 2021. "The effect of political ideology and message frame on donation intent during the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 201-213.
    15. Daniel Walsh & Juliet Foster, 2022. "Charting an Alternative Course for Mental Health-Related Anti-Stigma Social and Behaviour Change Programmes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, August.
    16. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:2:p:140-147 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Lorenza Magliano & Antonella Strino & Rosanna Punzo & Roberta Acone & Gaetana Affuso & John Read, 2017. "Effects of the diagnostic label ‘schizophrenia’, actively used or passively accepted, on general practitioners’ views of this disorder," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(3), pages 224-234, May.
    18. Cori L. Tergesen & Dristy Gurung & Saraswati Dhungana & Ajay Risal & Prem Basel & Dipesh Tamrakar & Archana Amatya & Lawrence P. Park & Brandon A. Kohrt, 2021. "Impact of Service User Video Presentations on Explicit and Implicit Stigma toward Mental Illness among Medical Students in Nepal: A Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    19. Norman C. H. Wong & Zachary Massey, 2023. "Implicit Attitudes and Terror Management: Pilot of Implicit Association Test as a Means of Measuring Death-Thought Accessibility," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 11(5), pages 28-38, September.
    20. Kohrt, Brandon A. & Turner, Elizabeth L. & Rai, Sauharda & Bhardwaj, Anvita & Sikkema, Kathleen J. & Adelekun, Adesewa & Dhakal, Manoj & Luitel, Nagendra P. & Lund, Crick & Patel, Vikram & Jordans, Ma, 2020. "Reducing mental illness stigma in healthcare settings: Proof of concept for a social contact intervention to address what matters most for primary care providers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    21. McGinty, Emma E. & Goldman, Howard H. & Pescosolido, Bernice & Barry, Colleen L., 2015. "Portraying mental illness and drug addiction as treatable health conditions: Effects of a randomized experiment on stigma and discrimination," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 73-85.
    22. Focquaert, Farah, 2019. "Neurobiology and crime: A neuro-ethical perspective," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:62:y:2016:i:1:p:21-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.