IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v48y2017i2p249-267.html

Governments Should Play Games

Author

Listed:
  • Lobna Hassan

Abstract

Background. Gamification is concerned with the utilization of motivational affordances that create value-adding experience in the design of services . It has many applications in different fields and has been shown to be a good design methodology to influence motivation and behavioral change. Civic engagement and its online platforms could benefit from gamification, as these areas suffer from low engagement levels, thus defeating the purpose for which they are created. Purpose. There is a lack of understanding of how civic engagement platforms should be gamified to sustain active engagement and assist in community building, while also fulfilling their operational objectives. This article aims to provide a theoretical framework and guidelines for the gamification of civic engagement platforms. Contribution. A theoretical framework for the gamification of civic engagement platforms is presented, drawing upon self-determination theory and democratic deliberation theory . Through this work, we also identify future research directions and highlight the need for research on related subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobna Hassan, 2017. "Governments Should Play Games," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 249-267, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:2:p:249-267
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878116683581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878116683581
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878116683581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Igor S. Mayer, 2009. "The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 40(6), pages 825-862, December.
    2. Archon Fung & Erik Olin Wright, 2001. "Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance," Politics & Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 5-41, March.
    3. Perote-Peña, Juan & Piggins, Ashley, 2015. "A Model Of Deliberative And Aggregative Democracy," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 93-121, March.
    4. Jin, Xiao-Ling & Zhou, Zhongyun & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Cheung, Christy M.K., 2013. "Why users keep answering questions in online question answering communities: A theoretical and empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 93-104.
    5. James Stewart & Lizzy Bleumers & Centeno, 2013. "The Potential of Digital Games for Empowerment and Social Inclusion of Groups at Risk of Social and Economic Exclusion: Evidence and Opportunity for Policy," JRC Research Reports JRC78777, Joint Research Centre.
    6. J. H. Jung & Christoph Schneider & Joseph Valacich, 2010. "Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 724-742, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy C. Clapper, 2017. "Simulation and Gaming can be Used to Determine Validity While Engaging in Collaborative Environments," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 175-177, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Euclid Tsakalotos, 2007. "Competitive Equilibrium and the Social Ethos: Understanding the Inegalitarian Dynamics of Liberal Market Economies," Politics & Society, , vol. 35(3), pages 427-446, September.
    2. Lily - Trinh Hoang Hong Hue, 2019. "Gender Differences of Citizen Participation in Local Government: The Case of Vietnam," Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(3), pages 225-238, December.
    3. Gianluca Misuraca & Clelia Colombo & Csaba Kucsera & Stephanie Carretero & Margherita Bacigalupo & Raluca Radescu, 2015. "ICT-enabled Social Innovation in support of the Implementation of the Social Investment Package (IESI) - Mapping and Analysis of ICT-enabled Social Innovation Initiatives promoting Social Investment through Integrated Approaches to the Provision of S," JRC Research Reports JRC97467, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Strzelecka, Marianna & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Akhshik, Arash & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2021. "Environmental justice in Natura 2000 conservation conflicts: The case for resident empowerment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    5. Christian Haposan Pangaribuan & Rahmat Arif Febriyanto, 2019. "Motivational Impact and Value Perception of Digital Badges towards Applying for Jobs: Evidence from Indonesian Undergraduates," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 121-130.
    6. Yanuar Nugroho & Gindo Tampubolon, 2008. "Network Dynamics in the Transition to Democracy: Mapping Global Networks of Contemporary Indonesian Civil Society," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 13(5), pages 144-160, September.
    7. Catherine Ragasa & Cristina Alvarez-Mingote & Paul McNamara, 2024. "Bottom-Up Approaches and Decentralized Extension Structures for Improving Access to and Quality of Extension Services and Technology Adoption: Multi-level Analysis from Malawi," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(5), pages 1093-1146, October.
    8. Grillos, Tara, 2017. "Participatory Budgeting and the Poor: Tracing Bias in a Multi-Staged Process in Solo, Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-358.
    9. Xiaoyun Jia & Ruili Wang & Yaobin Lu & James H. Liu & Zhao Pan, 2025. "Investigation of continuance stream-watching intention: an empirical study," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 547-558, December.
    10. Timo Ohnmacht & Widar von Arx & Norbert Schick & Philipp Wegelin & Jonas Frölicher, 2015. "Transportation Modeling as a Didactic Tool," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(5), pages 563-590, October.
    11. Korina Katsaliaki & Navonil Mustafee, 2015. "Edutainment for Sustainable Development," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 46(6), pages 647-672, December.
    12. Sangbum Shin & Taedong Lee, 2021. "Credible Empowerment and Deliberative Participation: A Comparative Study of Two Nuclear Energy Policy Deliberation Cases in Korea," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(1), pages 97-112, January.
    13. Matthew Amengual & Janice Fine, 2017. "Co‐enforcing Labor standards: the unique contributions of state and worker organizations in Argentina and the United States," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 129-142, June.
    14. Yuriy V. Belousov, 2022. "Transparent Budget in the System of Public Administration," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 4, pages 79-91, August.
    15. Smith, Antoinette L. & Murthy, Uday S. & Engle, Terry J., 2012. "Why computer-mediated communication improves the effectiveness of fraud brainstorming," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 334-356.
    16. Nils Matzner & Robert Herrenbrück, 2017. "Simulating a Climate Engineering Crisis," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 48(2), pages 268-290, April.
    17. Michiel A. Heldeweg, 2017. "Normative Alignment, Institutional Resilience and Shifts in Legal Governance of the Energy Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-34, July.
    18. Lan, Xiaomeng & Song, Baobao, 2025. "The more, the merrier? Investigating the distinct and interaction effects of gamification mechanics in corporate sustainability engagement," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Evans Sakyi Boadu, 2024. "Evaluating Ghana’s Youth-Centered Food-Security Policies: A Collaborative Governance Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-17, May.
    20. Jimmy Donaghey, 2008. "Deliberation, Employment Relations and Social Partnership in the Republic of Ireland," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 29(1), pages 35-63, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:48:y:2017:i:2:p:249-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.