IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/simgam/v38y2007i2p211-232.html

Microworld gaming of a local agricultural production chain in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Leslie Martin

    (University of California-Berkeley, USA, llamartin@berkeley.edu)

  • Piotr Magnuszewski

    (Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland, piotr.magnuszewski@pwr.wroc.pl)

  • Jan Sendzimir

    (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria, sendzim@iiasa.ac.at)

  • Felicjan Rydzak

    (Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland, felicjan.rydzak@pwr.wroc.pl)

  • Karolina Krolikowska

    (University of Wroclaw, Poland, kakrol@uni.wroc.pl)

  • Hubert Komorowski

    (Warsaw Agricultural University, Poland, komorowski@alpha.sggw.waw.pl)

  • Anna Lewandowska-Czarnecka

    (Nicolaus Copernicus University, Poland, lewandow@biol)

  • Joanna Wojanowska

    (Environmental Partnership Foundation, Poland, wojasia@wp.pl)

  • Anna Lasut

    (AGH University of Science and Technology, Poland, alasut@zarz.agh.edu.pl)

  • Jadwiga Magnuszewska

    (Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland, jadwiga.magnuszewska@crs.org.pl)

  • Piotr Goliczewski

    (Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland, piotr.goliczewski@crs.org.pl)

Abstract

Natural resource management of complex, adaptive socioecosystems requires a mix of good practice, policy, science, and intuition. We report here on a rapid and low-cost experiment in Lower Silesia, Poland, using modeling techniques to explore the potential to develop local ecological products. We focus our analysis on one particular group of products related to an “ancient†breed of chicken, the green-legged hen (GLH), with low resource requirements that could support a sustainable agriculture based on lower use of fertilizers and pesticides. The issues affecting farmers' commitment to adopt GLHs include availability of EU subsidies, the supportive role of NGOs, cooperation between producers, and uncertainty about the future profitability of a relatively untested product. We used this model to evaluate alternative scenarios, nurture the discussion among farmers, and stimulate them to take appropriate action. Gaming with a microworld interface was a crucial breakthrough experience for the farmers to accept and understand the scientific language and methods, and to join the community discussion by actively contributing to improving the model. This positive experience could be a crucial initial step toward the transition from intensive to extensive farming methods, thereby increasing the resilience of natural resource—based rural economies.

Suggested Citation

  • Leslie Martin & Piotr Magnuszewski & Jan Sendzimir & Felicjan Rydzak & Karolina Krolikowska & Hubert Komorowski & Anna Lewandowska-Czarnecka & Joanna Wojanowska & Anna Lasut & Jadwiga Magnuszewska & P, 2007. "Microworld gaming of a local agricultural production chain in Poland," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 38(2), pages 211-232, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:2:p:211-232
    DOI: 10.1177/1046878107300663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1046878107300663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1046878107300663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Magnuszewski & Jan Sendzimir & Jakub Kronenberg, 2005. "Conceptual Modeling for Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management in the Barycz Valley, Lower Silesia, Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Krystyna A. Stave, 2002. "Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 139-167, June.
    3. Andrew Jones & Don Seville & Donella Meadows, 2002. "Resource sustainability in commodity systems: the sawmill industry in the Northern Forest," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 171-204, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dernat, Sylvain & Grillot, Myriam & Andreotti, Federico & Martel, Gilles, 2025. "A sustainable game changer? Systematic review of serious games used for agriculture and research agenda," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Amadou Sidibé, 2023. "Observations from a system dynamics modeling field school in Mali," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(1), pages 80-94, January.
    2. Jesus R. Gastelum & Ganesh Krishnamurthy & Nemesciano Ochoa & Shane Sibbett & Margie Armstrong & Parag Kalaria, 2018. "The Use of System Dynamics Model to Enhance Integrated Resources Planning Implementation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(7), pages 2247-2260, May.
    3. Maruccia, Ylenia & Solazzo, Gianluca & Del Vecchio, Pasquale & Passiante, Giuseppina, 2020. "Evidence from Network Analysis application to Innovation Systems and Quintuple Helix," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    4. Fabio Blanco-Mesa & Anna M. Gil-Lafuente & José M. Merigó, 2018. "Subjective stakeholder dynamics relationships treatment: a methodological approach using fuzzy decision-making," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 441-472, December.
    5. Salim, H.K. & Stewart, R.A. & Sahin, O. & Dudley, M., 2020. "Systems approach to end-of-life management of residential photovoltaic panels and battery energy storage system in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    6. Henry Amorocho‐Daza & Pieter van der Zaag & Janez Sušnik, 2024. "Ethical considerations of using system dynamics in participatory settings: a social‐ecological‐systems perspective," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(2), April.
    7. Dennis Meadows, 2002. "Dana Meadows: asking hard questions, speaking simple truths," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 18(2), pages 111-119, June.
    8. Maria Cleofe Giorgino & Federico Barnabè & Martin Kunc, 2020. "Integrating qualitative system dynamics with accounting practices: The case of integrated reporting and resource mapping," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 97-118, January.
    9. Jia Shi & Xuesong Guo & Xiangnan Hu, 2019. "Engaging Stakeholders in Urban Traffic Restriction Policy Assessment Using System Dynamics: The Case Study of Xi’an City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    10. Inomata, Sandrelly Oliveira & Gonzalez, Alba Maria Guadalupe Orellana & Román, Rodrigo Máximo Sánchez & de Souza, Lucirene Aguiar & de Carvalho Freitas, Carlos Edwar, 2018. "Sustainability of small-scale fisheries in the middle Negro River (Amazonas – Brazil): A model with operational and biological variables," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 312-320.
    11. Lopes, Rita & Videira, Nuno, 2017. "Modelling feedback processes underpinning management of ecosystem services: The role of participatory systems mapping," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 28-42.
    12. Ya-Tsune Sie & Pierre-Alexandre Château & Yang-Chi Chang & Shiau-Yun Lu, 2018. "Stakeholders Opinions on Multi-Use Deep Water Offshore Platform in Hsiao-Liu-Chiu, Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-13, February.
    13. Ricciardi, Francesca & De Bernardi, Paola & Cantino, Valter, 2020. "System dynamics modeling as a circular process: The smart commons approach to impact management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Justin D. Connolly & Graeme J. Doole, 2024. "An analysis of participants' introductory experience with causal loop diagrams (CLDs) using group model building (GMB) scripts," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 40(4), October.
    15. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    16. Laura Schmitt Olabisi & Saweda Liverpool-Tasie & Louie Rivers & Arika Ligmann-Zielinska & Jing Du & Riva Denny & Sandra Marquart-Pyatt & Amadou Sidibé, 2018. "Using participatory modeling processes to identify sources of climate risk in West Africa," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 23-32, March.
    17. T-S Jan & C-T Hsiao, 2004. "A four-role model of the automotive industry development in developing countries: a case in Taiwan," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(11), pages 1145-1155, November.
    18. Ana María González & Harrison Sandoval & Pilar Acosta & Felipe Henao, 2016. "On the Acceptance and Sustainability of Renewable Energy Projects—A Systems Thinking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Robert Yawson & Jennifer Kuzma, 2010. "Systems Mapping of Consumer Acceptance of Agrifood Nanotechnology," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 299-322, December.
    20. Eefje Cuppen, 2012. "Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(1), pages 23-46, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:simgam:v:38:y:2007:i:2:p:211-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.