IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i1p2158244014522076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Development of Scientific Strategy Knowledge Across Grades

Author

Listed:
  • Ronny Scherer
  • Rüdiger Tiemann

Abstract

In this study, we developed a new test on scientific strategy knowledge and investigated the construct validity of the resulting test scores. Moreover, measurement invariance across grade levels has been analyzed to ensure the generalizability of the assessment. Furthermore, convergent and discriminant validity were investigated. A total of N = 1,182 German high school students of Grade Levels 8, 10, and 12 completed tasks on strategy knowledge, fluid intelligence, content knowledge, interest in science, and scientific self-concept within a cross-sectional study. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to check for measurement invariance. Our results show that scalar invariance holds across grades and that there are significant differences in performance favoring students of higher grade levels. Furthermore, fluid intelligence and content knowledge are relevant predictors of strategy knowledge, whereas gender and motivational constructs do not show significant effects. Implications for developmental studies on strategy knowledge and assessment practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ronny Scherer & Rüdiger Tiemann, 2014. "The Development of Scientific Strategy Knowledge Across Grades," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014522076
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014522076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014522076
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014522076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kondrashova-didenko V., 2009. "Intellect oriented Economics," Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics. Вісник Киiвського нацiонального унiверситету iм. Тараса Шевченка. Серiя: Економiка, CyberLeninka;Издательско-полиграфический центр «Киевский университет», issue 109, pages 56-59.
    2. Holger Steinmetz & Peter Schmidt & Andrea Tina-Booh & Siegrid Wieczorek & Shalom Schwartz, 2009. "Testing measurement invariance using multigroup CFA: differences between educational groups in human values measurement," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 599-616, July.
    3. Martynuk L. & Nevinchanyi I., 2009. "Formation of modern intellectual property conception," Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics. Вісник Киiвського нацiонального унiверситету iм. Тараса Шевченка. Серiя: Економiка, CyberLeninka;Издательско-полиграфический центр «Киевский университет», issue 107-108, pages 93-96.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virginia Fernández-Pérez & Ana Montes-Merino & Lázaro Rodríguez-Ariza & Patricia Esther Alonso Galicia, 2019. "Emotional competencies and cognitive antecedents in shaping student’s entrepreneurial intention: the moderating role of entrepreneurship education," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 281-305, March.
    2. repec:ibn:ijpsnl:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. André Pirralha & Wiebke Weber, 2020. "Correction for measurement error in invariance testing: An illustration using SQP," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Yaël Drunen & Bram Spruyt & Filip Droogenbroeck, 2021. "The Salience of Perceived Societal Conflict in Europe: A 27 Country Study on the Development of a Measure for Generalized Conflict Thinking," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 158(2), pages 595-635, December.
    5. Pérez-Arechaederra, Diana & Briones, Elena & Lind, Allan & García-Ortiz, Luis, 2014. "Perceived Organizational Justice in Care Services: Creation and multi-sample validation of a measure," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 26-32.
    6. Veljko Jovanović, 2019. "Evaluation of Domain Satisfaction Measure in Cross-National Perspective: Evidence from Austria and Four Countries of the Former Yugoslavia," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1369-1385, February.
    7. Andrew Burr & Jonathan Santo & Dolores Pushkar, 2014. "Investigating the Portrait Values Questionnaire at two transitions in adulthood: Retirement and University," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 1027-1044, March.
    8. Anastasia Charalampi & Catherine Michalopoulou & Clive Richardson, 2020. "Validation of the 2012 European Social Survey Measurement of Wellbeing in Seventeen European Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(1), pages 73-105, March.
    9. Hohenberger, Christoph & Spörrle, Matthias & Welpe, Isabell M., 2017. "Not fearless, but self-enhanced: The effects of anxiety on the willingness to use autonomous cars depend on individual levels of self-enhancement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 40-52.
    10. Jesus Alfonso D. Datu & Dennis M. McInerney & Magdalena Żemojtel-Piotrowska & Hidefumi Hitokoto & Nino D. Datu, 2021. "Is Grittiness Next to Happiness? Examining the Association of Triarchic Model of Grit Dimensions with Well-Being Outcomes," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 981-1009, February.
    11. Nardi Steverink & Siegwart Lindenberg & Tali Spiegel & Anna P. Nieboer, 2020. "The Associations of Different Social Needs with Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being: An Empirical Investigation Based on Social Production Function Theory," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 799-824, March.
    12. Melissa Kimber & Jürgen Rehm & Mark A Ferro, 2015. "Measurement Invariance of the WHODAS 2.0 in a Population-Based Sample of Youth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Jiaming Fang & Chao Wen & Victor Prybutok, 2014. "An assessment of equivalence between Internet and paper-based surveys: evidence from collectivistic cultures," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 493-506, January.
    14. Braden K. Tompke & Mark A. Ferro, 2021. "Measurement Invariance and Informant Discrepancies of the KIDSCREEN-27 in Children with Mental Disorder," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 891-910, April.
    15. Catherine Verniers & Jorge Vala, 2018. "Justifying gender discrimination in the workplace: The mediating role of motherhood myths," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014522076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.