IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241242188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Learning Intention Scale (AILIS) for University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Ching Sing Chai
  • Ding Yu
  • Ronnel B. King
  • Ying Zhou

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) permeates almost all aspects of our lives, university students need to acquire relevant knowledge, skills, and attitudes to adapt to the challenges it poses. This study reports the development and validation of a scale called the Artificial Intelligence Learning Intention Scale (AILIS). AILIS was designed to measure the different factors that shape university students’ behavioral intentions to learn about AI and their AI learning. We recruited 907 Chinese university students who answered the survey. The scale is comprised of 9 factors that are categorized into various dimensions pertaining to epistemic capacity (AI basic knowledge, programming efficacy, designing AI for social good), facilitating environments (actual use of AI systems, subjective norms, access to support and technology), psychological attitudes (resilience, optimism, personal relevance), and focal outcomes (behavioral intention to learn AI, actual learning of AI). Reliability analyses and confirmatory factor analyses indicated that the scale has acceptable reliability and construct validity. Structural equational modeling results demonstrated the critical role played by epistemic capacity, facilitating environments, and psychological attitudes in promoting students’ behavioral intentions and actual learning of AI. Overall, the findings revealed that university students express a strong intention to learn about AI, and this behavioral intention is positively associated with actual learning. The study contextualizes the theory of planned behavior for university AI education, provides guidelines on the design of AI curriculum courses, and proposes a possible tool to evaluate university AI curriculum.

Suggested Citation

  • Ching Sing Chai & Ding Yu & Ronnel B. King & Ying Zhou, 2024. "Development and Validation of the Artificial Intelligence Learning Intention Scale (AILIS) for University Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241242188
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241242188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241242188
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241242188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nenad Tomašev & Julien Cornebise & Frank Hutter & Shakir Mohamed & Angela Picciariello & Bec Connelly & Danielle C. M. Belgrave & Daphne Ezer & Fanny Cachat van der Haert & Frank Mugisha & Gerald Abil, 2020. "AI for social good: unlocking the opportunity for positive impact," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-6, December.
    2. Ronnel B. King & Imelda S. Caleon, 2021. "School Psychological Capital: Instrument Development, Validation, and Prediction," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 14(1), pages 341-367, February.
    3. Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Hughes, Laurie & Ismagilova, Elvira & Aarts, Gert & Coombs, Crispin & Crick, Tom & Duan, Yanqing & Dwivedi, Rohita & Edwards, John & Eirug, Aled & Galanos, Vassilis & Ilavarasan, , 2021. "Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    4. Faming Wang & Ronnel B. King & Shing On Leung, 2022. "Beating the odds: Identifying the top predictors of resilience among Hong Kong students," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 15(5), pages 1921-1944, October.
    5. Ching Sing Chai & Xingwei Wang & Chang Xu, 2020. "An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior for the Modelling of Chinese Secondary School Students’ Intention to Learn Artificial Intelligence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mohammad Imtiaz Hossain & Mosab I. Tabash & May Ling Siow & Tze San Ong & Suhaib Anagreh, 2023. "Entrepreneurial intentions of Gen Z university students and entrepreneurial constraints in Bangladesh," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-34, December.
    7. Rayees Farooq, 2016. "Role of structural equation modeling in scale development," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, March.
    8. Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Budhwar, Pawan & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Joel-Edgar, Sian & Abadie, Amelie, 2022. "AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 31-49.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Qiwei & Chen, Keyu & Cheng, Shuang, 2024. "Bringing employee learning to AI stress research: A moderated mediation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Abou-Foul, Mohamad & Ruiz-Alba, Jose L. & López-Tenorio, Pablo J., 2023. "The impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on servitization: The moderating role of absorptive capacity-A dynamic capabilities perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Chen, Pengyu & Chu, Zhongzhu & Zhao, Miao, 2024. "The Road to corporate sustainability: The importance of artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Ciurea Iulia-Cristina, 2024. "The Impact of the EU AI Act on the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – A Text Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2857-2870.
    5. Maggie Wang, Yazhu & Matook, Sabine & Dennis, Alan R., 2024. "Unintended consequences of humanoid service robots: A case study of public service organizations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Borba, Rafael Lucas & de Paula Ferreira, Iuri Emmanuel & Bertucci Ramos, Paulo Henrique, 2024. "Addressing discriminatory bias in artificial intelligence systems operated by companies: An analysis of end-user perspectives," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    7. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    8. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2025. "Critical analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence integration with cutting-edge technologies for production systems," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 61-93, January.
    9. Yi Sun & Shihui Li & Lingling Yu, 2022. "The dark sides of AI personal assistant: effects of service failure on user continuance intention," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 17-39, March.
    10. Byung-Jik Kim & Julak Lee, 2024. "The mental health implications of artificial intelligence adoption: the crucial role of self-efficacy," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Chen, Xun-Qi & Ma, Chao-Qun & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Lei, Yu-Tian & Huynh, Ngoc Quang Anh & Narayan, Seema, 2023. "Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: A bibliometric review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Kamoonpuri, Sana Zehra & Sengar, Anita, 2023. "Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. D'Al, Francesco & Santarelli, Enrico & Vivarelli, Marco, 2024. "The KSTE+I approach and the advent of AI technologies: evidence from the European regions," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1473, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Radka Nacheva & Maciej Czaplewski, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence In Helping People With Disabilities: Opportunities And Challenges," HR and Technologies, Creative Space Association, issue 1, pages 102-124.
    15. Fawwaz Tawfiq Awamleh & Ala Nihad Bustami, 2022. "Examine the Mediating Role of the Information Technology Capabilities on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Competitive Advantage During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, August.
    16. Ksenia V. Ekimova, 2023. "Development of the potential of the digital economy of Russian regions through artificial intelligence humanisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Hua Du & Yanchao Sun & Haozhe Jiang & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Xiaoqing Gu, 2024. "Exploring the effects of AI literacy in teacher learning: an empirical study," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Ryu, Do-Hyeon & Kim, Kwang-Jae, 2024. "The influence of information privacy concerns and perceived electricity usage habits on the usage intention of advanced metering infrastructure," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    19. Mustak, Mekhail & Salminen, Joni & Mäntymäki, Matti & Rahman, Arafat & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2023. "Deepfakes: Deceptions, mitigations, and opportunities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    20. Ching Sing Chai & Thomas K. F. Chiu & Xingwei Wang & Feng Jiang & Xiao-Fan Lin, 2022. "Modeling Chinese Secondary School Students’ Behavioral Intentions to Learn Artificial Intelligence with the Theory of Planned Behavior and Self-Determination Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241242188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.