IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i3p21582440231194212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Novel Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model for Internet Consumer Financial Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Guangyu Mu
  • Yuhan Wang
  • Nan Gao
  • Xiurong Li

Abstract

Due to many social problems caused by Internet consumer finance, Internet consumer finance regulation has always become one of the main concerns of governments and society. Based on a novel three-dimensional mixed strategy game matrix, this paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model for regulators, Internet consumer financial institutions, and consumers. In this model, we establish the dynamic replication equation of the three parties above, analyze the influence of factors on the tripartite strategy selection and discuss the stability of model equilibrium points through numerical simulation. The results show that the model will get six evolutionary stable points in Internet consumer financial regulation under different conditions. Moreover, strict regulation, verification, and contract keeping are the most ideal evolutionarily stable strategies. In addition, three critical factors affect the evolution results of the three parties, namely losses to institutions caused by loose regulation and verification, punishment for loose verification under strict regulation, and losses from breaking the contract.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangyu Mu & Yuhan Wang & Nan Gao & Xiurong Li, 2023. "A Novel Tripartite Evolutionary Game Model for Internet Consumer Financial Regulation," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231194212
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231194212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231194212
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231194212?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Mufarrige & Todd J. Zywicki, 2021. "Simple rules for a complex regulatory world: the case of financial regulation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 285-305, December.
    2. Zhicheng Weng & Pinliang Luo, 2021. "Supervision of the Default Risk of Online Car-Hailing Platform from an Evolutionary Game Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. An, Hui & Yang, Ruibo & Ma, Xuejiao & Zhang, Siqi & Islam, Sardar M.N., 2021. "An evolutionary game theory model for the inter-relationships between financial regulation and financial innovation," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    4. José Carlos Laguna de Paz, 2023. "Some implications of the new global digital economy for financial regulation and supervision," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 146-155, June.
    5. Wall, Larry D., 2018. "Some financial regulatory implications of artificial intelligence," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 55-63.
    6. Groll, Thomas & O’Halloran, Sharyn & McAllister, Geraldine, 2021. "Delegation and the regulation of U.S. financial markets," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Emily Jones & Peter Knaack, 2019. "Global Financial Regulation: Shortcomings and Reform Options," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 10(2), pages 193-206, May.
    8. Hua Liu & Sheng Ge, 2020. "Research on Audit Supervision of Internet Finance," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Elena Cigu & Mihai-Bogdan Petrișor & Alina-Cristina Nuță & Florian-Marcel Nuță & Ionel Bostan, 2020. "The Nexus between Financial Regulation and Green Sustainable Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mustafa Pamuk & Matthias Schumann, 2023. "Opening a New Era with Machine Learning in Financial Services? Forecasting Corporate Credit Ratings Based on Annual Financial Statements," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Drago, Carlo & Gatto, Andrea, 2022. "Policy, regulation effectiveness, and sustainability in the energy sector: A worldwide interval-based composite indicator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    3. Fraisse, Henri & Laporte, Matthias, 2022. "Return on investment on artificial intelligence: The case of bank capital requirement," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Jurgita Bruneckiene & Robertas Jucevicius & Ineta Zykiene & Jonas Rapsikevicius & Mantas Lukauskas, 2019. "Assessment of Investment Attractiveness in European Countries by Artificial Neural Networks: What Competences are Needed to Make a Decision on Collective Well-Being?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-23, December.
    5. Subhadeep Mukhopadhyay, 2021. "InfoGram and Admissible Machine Learning," Papers 2108.07380, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2021.
    6. Johannes Matschke, 2021. "National Interests, Spillovers and Macroprudential Coordination," Research Working Paper RWP 21-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    7. Goodell, John W. & Kumar, Satish & Lim, Weng Marc & Pattnaik, Debidutta, 2021. "Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations, themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    8. Román Alejandro Mendoza Urdiales & Andrés García-Medina & José Antonio Nuñez Mora, 2021. "Measuring information flux between social media and stock prices with Transfer Entropy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Andrés Alonso Robisco & José Manuel Carbó Martínez, 2022. "Measuring the model risk-adjusted performance of machine learning algorithms in credit default prediction," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-35, December.
    10. Rodrigues, Ana Rita D. & Ferreira, Fernando A.F. & Teixeira, Fernando J.C.S.N. & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, digital transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Salman Bahoo & Marco Cucculelli & Xhoana Goga & Jasmine Mondolo, 2024. "Artificial intelligence in Finance: a comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1-46, February.
    12. Henri Fraisse & Matthias Laporte, 2021. "Return on Investment on AI: The Case of Capital Requirement," Working papers 809, Banque de France.
    13. Li, Guoxiang & Wu, Haoyue & Jiang, Jieshu & Zong, Qingqing, 2023. "Digital finance and the low-carbon energy transition (LCET) from the perspective of capital-biased technical progress," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. W. Scott Frame & Larry Wall & Lawrence J. White, 2018. "Technological Change and Financial Innovation in Banking: Some Implications for FinTech," Working Papers 18-28, New York University, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, Department of Economics.
    15. Olha Popelo & Maksym Dubyna & Nataliia Kholiavko, 2021. "World Experience In The Introduction Of Modern Innovation And Information Technologies In The Functioning Of Financial Institutions," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 7(2).
    16. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Michael B. Imerman & Harshit Rajaiya & Qianqian Yu, 2020. "Recent Developments In The Fintech Industry," Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions (JFMMI), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(01), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Chao, Xiangrui & Ran, Qin & Chen, Jia & Li, Tie & Qian, Qian & Ergu, Daji, 2022. "Regulatory technology (Reg-Tech) in financial stability supervision: Taxonomy, key methods, applications and future directions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. João Jungo & Mara Madaleno & Anabela Botelho, 2022. "Financial Regulation, Financial Inclusion and Competitiveness in the Banking Sector in SADC and SAARC Countries: The Moderating Role of Financial Stability," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Larry D. Wall, 2020. "Is stricter regulation of incentive compensation the missing piece?," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 82-94, March.
    20. Céline Baud & Nathalie Lallemand-Stempak, 2024. "Quantitative technologies and reflexivity: The role of tools and their layouts in the case of credit risk management," Post-Print hal-04419872, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:21582440231194212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.