IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i2p21582440231166844.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Mapping of Tourist Experience Research: Based on CiteSpace Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Hongmei Guan
  • Taozhen Huang
  • Xin Guo

Abstract

Tourist experience research has been increasing in practitioners and academics. The study collected 1,079 tourist experience related articles published in the Web of Science (WOS) core database to summarize research on tourist experience from 2007 to 2019 and to explore research hotspots and trends related to the topic. CiteSpace analysis was used from the selected 1,045 articles to identify and visualize the evolution of knowledge. The results revealed that the major disciplines for research tourist experience are Hospitality Leisure Sport Tourism disciplines. The most influential authors are mostly from high-yield institutions. The high-yield countries (regions) are in the USA, China, Australia, England and Italy. In addition, three hotspots research topics and contemporary trends are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongmei Guan & Taozhen Huang & Xin Guo, 2023. "Knowledge Mapping of Tourist Experience Research: Based on CiteSpace Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(2), pages 21582440231, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231166844
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231166844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231166844
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231166844?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dong Lu & Yide Liu & Ivan Lai & Li Yang, 2017. "Awe: An Important Emotional Experience in Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Yawei Jiang & Brent W. Ritchie & Pierre Benckendorff, 2019. "Bibliometric visualisation: an application in tourism crisis and disaster management research," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(16), pages 1925-1957, October.
    3. Chaomei Chen & Fidelia Ibekwe‐SanJuan & Jianhua Hou, 2010. "The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple‐perspective cocitation analysis," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(7), pages 1386-1409, July.
    4. Chiu, Yen-Ting Helena & Lee, Wan-I. & Chen, Tsung-Hsiung, 2014. "Environmentally responsible behavior in ecotourism: Antecedents and implications," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 321-329.
    5. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    6. Yi Cui & Jian Mou & Yanping Liu, 2018. "Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: a visual analysis using CiteSpace," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 837-868, December.
    7. Xinwei Su & Xi Li & Yanxin Kang, 2019. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Intangible Cultural Heritage Using CiteSpace," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    8. Kevin W. Boyack & Brian N. Wylie & George S. Davidson, 2002. "Domain visualization using VxInsight® for science and technology management," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 53(9), pages 764-774.
    9. Chaomei Chen & Fidelia Ibekwe-SanJuan & Jianhua Hou, 2010. "The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(7), pages 1386-1409, July.
    10. Chen, Ching-Fu & Chen, Fu-Shian, 2010. "Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 29-35.
    11. Kim, Jong-Hyeong, 2014. "The antecedents of memorable tourism experiences: The development of a scale to measure the destination attributes associated with memorable experiences," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 34-45.
    12. Sørensen, Flemming & Jensen, Jens Friis, 2015. "Value creation and knowledge development in tourism experience encounters," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 336-346.
    13. Thed van Leeuwen, 2006. "The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(1), pages 133-154, January.
    14. Prokopis A. Christou, 2020. "Tourism experiences as the remedy to nostalgia: conceptualizing the nostalgia and tourism nexus," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(5), pages 612-625, March.
    15. Henry Small, 1973. "Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 24(4), pages 265-269, July.
    16. Xiang, Zheng & Gretzel, Ulrike, 2010. "Role of social media in online travel information search," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 179-188.
    17. Suntikul, Wantanee & Jachna, Timothy, 2016. "The co-creation/place attachment nexus," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 276-286.
    18. Olle Persson, 1994. "The intellectual base and research fronts of JASIS 1986–1990," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 45(1), pages 31-38, January.
    19. Huchang Liao & Ming Tang & Li Luo & Chunyang Li & Francisco Chiclana & Xiao-Jun Zeng, 2018. "A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization of Medical Big Data Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    20. Liubov Skavronskaya & Brent Moyle & Noel Scott & Anna Kralj, 2020. "The psychology of novelty in memorable tourism experiences," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(21), pages 2683-2698, November.
    21. Chu feng Yu & Yong Ma & Jie Ren, 2021. "Mapping the Landscape and Evolution of Research on Pro-Environmental Behavior of Tourists," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dan Liu & Siqi Che & Wenzhong Zhu, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Academic Mobility Research from 2010 to 2020: A Bibliometric Analysis Using CiteSpace," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    2. Shuo Xu & Liyuan Hao & Xin An & Hongshen Pang & Ting Li, 2020. "Review on emerging research topics with key-route main path analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 607-624, January.
    3. Floris Goerlandt & Jie Li & Genserik Reniers, 2021. "The Landscape of Risk Perception Research: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Pin Li & Guoli Yang & Chuanqi Wang, 2019. "Visual topical analysis of library and information science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1753-1791, December.
    5. Xin Zhao, 2022. "Customer Orientation: A Literature Review Based on Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, February.
    6. Jiaxing Jiang & Lin Fan, 2022. "Visualizing the Knowledge Domain of Language Experience: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.
    7. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    8. Francisco Díez-Martín & Alicia Blanco-González & Camilo Prado-Román, 2021. "The intellectual structure of organizational legitimacy research: a co-citation analysis in business journals," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1007-1043, May.
    9. Mehdi Amirkhani & Igor Martek & Mark B. Luther, 2021. "Mapping Research Trends in Residential Construction Retrofitting: A Scientometric Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Zuo, Zhili & Cheng, Jinhua & Guo, Haixiang & Li, Yonglin, 2021. "Knowledge mapping of research on strategic mineral resource security: A visual analysis using CiteSpace," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    11. Yuan Li & Wilfrid Azan, 2023. "Scientific knowledge production of blockchain: A bibliometric and lexicometric review," Post-Print hal-04180011, HAL.
    12. Boyack, Kevin W. & Klavans, Richard, 2014. "Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 569-580.
    13. Jun Liu & Shuang Lai & Ayesha Akram Rai & Abual Hassan & Ray Tahir Mushtaq, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Big Data Analytics in Urban Epidemiology Control: A Comprehensive Study Using CiteSpace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-24, February.
    14. Jingwei Zheng & Ke Zhang & Boya Han & Jiayi Hou, 2023. "Research Interdisciplinarity and Citation Impact: A Network Analysis of Social Networking Sites Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    15. Jiang, Kai & Ashworth, Peta, 2021. "The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    16. Chiemela Victor Amaechi & Idris Ahmed Ja’e & Ahmed Reda & Xuanze Ju, 2022. "Scientometric Review and Thematic Areas for the Research Trends on Marine Hoses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Maximilian Scheffler & Johannes Brunzel, 2020. "Destructive leadership in organizational research: a bibliometric approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 755-775, October.
    18. Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun & Chen, Xun-Qi & Lei, Yu-Tian & Wang, Yi-Ran, 2023. "Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Minxi Wang & Ping Liu & Rui Zhang & Zhi Li & Xin Li, 2020. "A Scientometric Analysis of Global Health Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Payam Hanafizadeh & Seyedali Marjaie, 2020. "Trends and turning points of banking: a timespan view," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1183-1219, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:21582440231166844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.