IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211038316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incite to Practice: Development of a Realist-Informed Program Theory to Support Implementation of Intersectoral Partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Irvine Fitzpatrick
  • Donald Maciver
  • Kirsty Forsyth

Abstract

Policy internationally is supportive of intersectoral partnerships (ISPs) for promoting positive outcomes among people with complex social, psychological, and physical needs. This realist-informed study describes the development of a program theory to provide insight into enactment of effective ISPs. Interviews were completed with 18 senior staff with leadership roles in six ISPs, including voluntary, statutory, and commercial organizations, supporting people with complex health and social care needs. An iteratively developed and refined program theory, termed the “Incite†model, was developed, with collaboration with participants and an advisory group, including people with lived experience. Important contextual conditions that emerged included organizational culture, historical perspectives, policy, and social determinants of health. Mechanisms included desire for change, creating safe psychological spaces, establishing shared values, and talking about power. Outcomes included transformed world view, increased psychological safety, clarity of purpose, fluidity of relationships, and power shifting. Three phases of partnership development were also identified within the model. This study has led to a clearer, more rigorous, and systematic understanding, with recommendations for how ISPs might be developed or expanded. How the Incite model may be operationalized is discussed, as well as implications for policy, practice, and research.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Irvine Fitzpatrick & Donald Maciver & Kirsty Forsyth, 2021. "Incite to Practice: Development of a Realist-Informed Program Theory to Support Implementation of Intersectoral Partnerships," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211038316
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211038316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211038316
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211038316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ketan Shankardass & Orielle Solar & Kelly Murphy & Lorraine Greaves & Patricia O’Campo, 2012. "A scoping review of intersectoral action for health equity involving governments," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(1), pages 25-33, February.
    2. Hawkins, Robert Leibson & Abrams, Courtney, 2007. "Disappearing acts: The social networks of formerly homeless individuals with co-occurring disorders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 2031-2042, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elizabeth Golembiewski & Dennis P. Watson & Lisa Robison & John W. Coberg II, 2017. "Social Network Decay as Potential Recovery from Homelessness: A Mixed Methods Study in Housing First Programming," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Yannai Kranzler & Yael Parag & Nadav Davidovitch, 2019. "Public Health from the Middle-Out: A New Analytical Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Jonas, Adam B. & Young, April M. & Oser, Carrie B. & Leukefeld, Carl G. & Havens, Jennifer R., 2012. "OxyContin® as currency: OxyContin® use and increased social capital among rural Appalachian drug users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1602-1609.
    4. Harris, Patrick & Kent, Jennifer & Sainsbury, Peter & Thow, Anne Marie, 2016. "Framing health for land-use planning legislation: A qualitative descriptive content analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 42-51.
    5. Alfred Rütten & Diana Schow & João Breda & Gauden Galea & Sonja Kahlmeier & Jean-Michel Oppert & Hidde Ploeg & Willem Mechelen, 2016. "Three types of scientific evidence to inform physical activity policy: results from a comparative scoping review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(5), pages 553-563, June.
    6. Benjamin Cornwell, 2015. "Social Disadvantage and Network Turnover," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 70(1), pages 132-142.
    7. Barbara Straaten & Gerda Rodenburg & Jorien Laan & Sandra N. Boersma & Judith R. L. M. Wolf & Dike Mheen, 2018. "Changes in Social Exclusion Indicators and Psychological Distress Among Homeless People Over a 2.5-Year Period," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 291-311, January.
    8. Ebenezer Owusu‐Addo & Andre M. N. Renzaho & Paul Sarfo‐Mensah & Yaw A. Sarpong & William Niyuni & Ben J. Smith, 2023. "Sustainability of cash transfer programs: A realist case study," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 173-198, June.
    9. Friel, Sharon & Townsend, Belinda & Fisher, Matthew & Harris, Patrick & Freeman, Toby & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Power and the people's health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    10. Franziska Bertram & Fabian Heinrich & Daniela Fröb & Birgit Wulff & Benjamin Ondruschka & Klaus Püschel & Hans-Helmut König & André Hajek, 2021. "Loneliness among Homeless Individuals during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-10, March.
    11. EnglandKennedy, Elizabeth Sara & Horton, Sarah, 2011. "“Everything that I thought that they would be, they weren’t:” Family systems as support and impediment to recovery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1222-1229.
    12. Daniel Weiss & Håvard T Rydland & Emil Øversveen & Magnus Rom Jensen & Solvor Solhaug & Steinar Krokstad, 2018. "Innovative technologies and social inequalities in health: A scoping review of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    14. Marjolijn Vos & Maria Romeo-Velilla & Ingrid Stegeman & Ruth Bell & Nina van der Vliet & Wendy Van Lippevelde, 2020. "Qualitative Evaluation of the STOEMP Network in Ghent: An Intersectoral Approach to Make Healthy and Sustainable Food Available to All," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Owusu-Addo, Ebenezer & Renzaho, Andre M.N. & Smith, Ben J., 2020. "Developing a middle-range theory to explain how cash transfers work to tackle the social determinants of health: A realist case study," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    16. Agnes Molnar & Emilie Renahy & Patricia O’Campo & Carles Muntaner & Alix Freiler & Ketan Shankardass, 2016. "Using Win-Win Strategies to Implement Health in All Policies: A Cross-Case Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Nick Kerman & John Sylvestre, 2020. "Service use and recovery among currently and formerly homeless adults with mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(4), pages 389-396, June.
    18. Ellen Strøm Synnevåg, 2022. "Evaluating ‘Health in All Policies’ in Norwegian Municipalities," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211038316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.